Public Service Models: A Systematic Literature Review and Synthesis

During the last decades, public authorities worldwide have invested heavily in electronic public services (PSs). This includes efforts for publishing information about PSs and for providing online PSs. Each of these efforts is based on an underlying PS Model, i.e., a data model developed for describing and/or developing PSs. Although many PS models exist, none has been universally accepted. This resulted in a fragmented landscape where resources are wasted, economies of scale cannot be achieved, and interoperability is hampered. Recently, the European Union (EU) launched the Core Public Service Vocabulary-Application Profile (CPSV-AP) as a reference PS model. However, CPSV-AP has not been thoroughly evaluated yet for comprehensiveness and compliance with EU policies. The aim of this work is to identify and analyze in a systematic way existing PS models and compare them with CPSV-AP. We conclude that CPSV-AP is comprehensive but can be further enriched with concepts from other PS models. We also provide evidence that the proposed enriched CPSV-AP better supports EU policies. Finally, we present a proof-of-concept pilot of the enriched model using linked data to demonstrate its technical feasibility and added value. Researchers, policy makers and practitioners could use the enriched model for conceptualizing and implementing electronic PSs.

[1]  Efthimios Tambouris,et al.  A reference requirements set for public service provision enterprise architectures , 2012, Software & Systems Modeling.

[2]  Vassilios Peristeras,et al.  Model-driven eGovernment interoperability: A review of the state of the art , 2009, Comput. Stand. Interfaces.

[3]  Efthimios Tambouris Introducing the need for a domain model in Public Service Provision (PSP) eGovernment Systems , 2008, 2008 Third International Conference on Digital Information Management.

[4]  Yannis Charalabidis,et al.  Paving the Way to eGovernment Transformation: Interoperability Registry Infrastructure Development , 2008, EGOV.

[5]  Efthimios Tambouris,et al.  Understanding and scoping life events , 2008 .

[6]  Nikos Loutas,et al.  Organizational engineering in public administration: the state of the art on eGovernment domain modeling , 2008, SAC '08.

[7]  Efthimios Tambouris,et al.  An Ontology for Modeling Life-Events , 2007, IEEE International Conference on Services Computing (SCC 2007).

[8]  Nikos Loutas,et al.  Public Administration Domain Ontology for a Semantic Web Services EGovernment Framework , 2007, IEEE International Conference on Services Computing (SCC 2007).

[9]  Tomasz Janowski,et al.  Domain models and enterprise application framework for developing electronic public services , 2007 .

[10]  Carlo Batini,et al.  A Repository of Services for the Government to Businesses Relationship , 2006, NGITS.

[11]  Costas Vassilakis,et al.  Ontology for E-Government Public Services , 2006 .

[12]  R. Davies,et al.  A semantic web service-based architecture for the interoperability of e-government services , 2005 .

[13]  Efthimios Tambouris,et al.  The Governmental Markup Language (GovML) , 2005 .

[14]  John Domingue,et al.  A conceptual model for semantically-based e-government portals , 2005 .

[15]  Andreas Abecker,et al.  On Managing Changes in the Ontology-Based E-government , 2004, CoopIS/DOA/ODBASE.

[16]  Olivier Glassey Developing a one-stop government data model , 2004, Gov. Inf. Q..

[17]  Andy McKay-Hubbard,et al.  Towards an ontology for electronic transaction services , 2002, Intell. Syst. Account. Finance Manag..

[18]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review , 2002, MIS Q..

[19]  Olivier Glassey One-stop Government Architecture based on the GovML Data Description Language , 2002 .