Structure of joint variability in bimanual pointing tasks

Changes in the structure of motor variability during practicing a bimanual pointing task were investigated using the framework of the uncontrolled manifold (UCM) hypothesis. The subjects performed fast and accurate planar movements with both arms, one moving the pointer and the other moving the target. The UCM hypothesis predicts that joint kinematic variability will be structured to selectively stabilize important task variables. This prediction was tested with respect to selective stabilization of the trajectory of the endpoint of each arm (unimanual control hypotheses) and with respect to selective stabilization of the timecourse of the vectorial distance between the target and the pointer tip (bimanual control hypothesis). Components of joint position variance not affecting and affecting a mean value of a selected variable were computed at each 10% of normalized movement time. The ratio of these two components (RV) served as a quantitative index of selective stabilization. Both unimanual control hypotheses and the bimanual control hypothesis were supported both prior to and after practice. However, the RV values for the bimanual control hypothesis were significantly higher than for either of the unimanual control hypothesis, suggesting that the bimanual synergy was not simply a simultaneous execution of two unimanual synergies. After practice, an improvement in both movement speed and accuracy was accompanied by counterintuitive changes in the structure of kinematic variability. Components of joint position variance affecting and not affecting a mean value of a selected variable decreased, but there was a significantly larger drop in the latter when applied on each of the three selected task variables corresponding to the three control hypotheses. We conclude that the UCM hypothesis allows quantitative assessment of the degree of stabilization of selected performance variables and provides information on changes in the structure of a multijoint synergy that may not be reflected in its overall performance.

[1]  P. Fitts.  The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.

[2]  P. Fitts,et al.  INFORMATION CAPACITY OF DISCRETE MOTOR RESPONSES. , 1964, Journal of experimental psychology.

[3]  C. H. Vanderwolf,et al.  The relation between hand preference and the performance of individual finger movements by left and right hands. , 1970, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[4]  I. Gartside.  Models of the Structural—Functional Organization of Certain Biological Systems , 1973 .

[5]  J. Abbs,et al.  Labial-Mandibular Coordination in the Production of Speech: Implications for the Operation of Motor Equivalence , 1976, Phonetica.

[6]  D Goodman,et al.  On the coordination of two-handed movements. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  K. J. Cole,et al.  Coordination of three-joint digit movements for rapid finger-thumb grasp. , 1986, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  N. Geschwind,et al.  Handedness is not a Unidimensional Trait , 1986, Cortex.

[9]  E. Saltzman,et al.  Space-time behavior of single and bimanual rhythmical movements: data and limit cycle model. , 1987 .

[10]  W G Darling,et al.  A linked muscular activation model for movement generation and control. , 1987, Journal of Motor Behavior.

[11]  M T Turvey,et al.  On the time allometry of co-ordinated rhythmic movements. , 1988, Journal of theoretical biology.

[12]  J. Winters,et al.  Optimized Strategies for Scaling Goal-Directed Dynamic Limb Movements , 1990 .

[13]  B. Vereijken,et al.  Free(z)ing Degrees of Freedom in Skill Acquisition , 1992 .

[14]  A. Karni,et al.  The time course of learning a visual skill , 1993, Nature.

[15]  G. Schöner.  Recent Developments and Problems in Human Movement Science and Their Conceptual Implications , 1995 .

[16]  M. Latash,et al.  What are “normal movements” in atypical populations? , 1996, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[17]  S. Grossberg,et al.  Neural control of interlimb oscillations , 1997, Biological Cybernetics.

[18]  Stephen H. Scott,et al.  Hand and joint paths during reaching movements with and without vision , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[19]  M. Latash.  Bernstein's traditions in movement studies , 1998 .

[20]  M L Latash,et al.  On the problem of adequate language in motor control. , 1998, Motor control.

[21]  Mark L. Latash,et al.  A study of a bimanual synergy associated with holding an object , 1998 .

[22]  M L Latash,et al.  Learning a motor task involving obstacles by a multi-joint, redundant limb: two synergies within one movement. , 1998, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[23]  Gregor Schöner,et al.  The uncontrolled manifold concept: identifying control variables for a functional task , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[24]  Daniel Cattaert,et al.  Simulating a neural cross-talk model for between-hand interference during bimanual circle drawing , 1999, Biological Cybernetics.

[25]  Mark L. Latash,et al.  Learning a pointing task with a kinematically redundant limb: Emerging synergies and patterns of final position variability , 1999 .

[26]  K. Doya,et al.  Parallel neural networks for learning sequential procedures , 1999, Trends in Neurosciences.

[27]  X Zhang,et al.  A three-dimensional dynamic posture prediction model for in-vehicle seated reaching movements: development and validation , 2000, Ergonomics.

[28]  Gregor Schöner,et al.  Identifying the control structure of multijoint coordination during pistol shooting , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[29]  M. Latash.  There is no motor redundancy in human movements. There is motor abundance. , 2000, Motor control.

[30]  C Hirata,et al.  Visual Dominance in Amending the Directional Parameter of Feedforward Control , 2000, Journal of motor behavior.

[31]  S. Iversen.  Motor control , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[32]  B I Prilutsky,et al.  Coordination of two- and one-joint muscles: functional consequences and implications for motor control. , 2000, Motor control.

[33]  R. Bootsma,et al.  Two-handed performance of a rhythmical fitts task by individuals and dyads. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.