The hydrological impact of geoengineering in the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP)

The hydrological impact of enhancing Earth's albedo by solar radiation management is investigated using simulations from 12 Earth System models contributing to the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP). We contrast an idealized experiment, G1, where the global mean radiative forcing is kept at preindustrial conditions by reducing insolation while the CO2 concentration is quadrupled to a 4×CO2 experiment. The reduction of evapotranspiration over land with instantaneously increasing CO2 concentrations in both experiments largely contributes to an initial reduction in evaporation. A warming surface associated with the transient adjustment in 4×CO2 generates an increase of global precipitation by around 6.9% with large zonal and regional changes in both directions, including a precipitation increase of 10% over Asia and a reduction of 7% for the North American summer monsoon. Reduced global evaporation persists in G1 with temperatures close to preindustrial conditions. Global precipitation is reduced by around 4.5%, and significant reductions occur over monsoonal land regions: East Asia (6%), South Africa (5%), North America (7%), and South America (6%). The general precipitation performance in models is discussed in comparison to observations. In contrast to the 4×CO2 experiment, where the frequency of months with heavy precipitation intensity is increased by over 50% in comparison to the control, a reduction of up to 20% is simulated in G1. These changes in precipitation in both total amount and frequency of extremes point to a considerable weakening of the hydrological cycle in a geoengineered world.

[1]  J. A. Jones.  The global hydrological cycle , 2014 .

[2]  Andrew S. Jones,et al.  Asymmetric forcing from stratospheric aerosols impacts Sahelian rainfall , 2013 .

[3]  T. Canty,et al.  An empirical model of global climate – Part 1: A critical evaluation of volcanic cooling , 2013 .

[4]  J. Fyfe,et al.  Biogeochemical carbon coupling influences global precipitation in geoengineering experiments , 2013 .

[5]  Tim Li,et al.  Future change of the global monsoon revealed from 19 CMIP5 models , 2013 .

[6]  Bin Wang,et al.  The Asian summer monsoon: an intercomparison of CMIP5 vs. CMIP3 simulations of the late 20th century , 2013, Climate Dynamics.

[7]  K. Trenberth,et al.  A Less Cloudy Future: The Role of Subtropical Subsidence in Climate Sensitivity , 2012, Science.

[8]  P. O’Gorman.  Sensitivity of tropical precipitation extremes to climate change , 2012 .

[9]  T. Andrews,et al.  An update on Earth's energy balance in light of the latest global observations , 2012 .

[10]  Ken Caldeira,et al.  Climate response to changes in atmospheric carbon dioxide and solar irradiance on the time scale of days to weeks , 2012 .

[11]  D. Frierson,et al.  Robust future precipitation declines in CMIP5 largely reflect the poleward expansion of model subtropical dry zones , 2012 .

[12]  Mark Lawrence,et al.  Solar irradiance reduction to counteract radiative forcing from a quadrupling of CO2: climate responses simulated by four earth system models , 2012 .

[13]  O. Boucher,et al.  Reversibility in an Earth System model in response to CO2 concentration changes , 2012 .

[14]  Richard Neale,et al.  Toward a Minimal Representation of Aerosols in Climate Models: Description and Evaluation in the Community Atmosphere Model CAM5 , 2012 .

[15]  Chao‐An Chen,et al.  Mechanisms for Global Warming Impacts on Precipitation Frequency and Intensity , 2012 .

[16]  T. Shinoda,et al.  The Equatorial Pacific Cold Tongue Simulated by IPCC AR4 Coupled GCMs: Upper Ocean Heat Budget and Feedback Analysis , 2012 .

[17]  S. Wijffels,et al.  Ocean Salinities Reveal Strong Global Water Cycle Intensification During 1950 to 2000 , 2012, Science.

[18]  Karl E. Taylor,et al.  An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design , 2012 .

[19]  Ken Caldeira,et al.  Crop yields in a geoengineered climate , 2012 .

[20]  D. Lobell,et al.  Crop yields in a geoengineered climate. Nature Clim Chang 2:101-105 , 2012 .

[21]  Bin Wang,et al.  Future change of global monsoon in the CMIP5 , 2012, Climate Dynamics.

[22]  J. Fasullo,et al.  A mechanism for land–ocean contrasts in global monsoon trends in a warming climate , 2011, Climate Dynamics.

[23]  R. Nemani,et al.  Albedo enhancement of marine clouds to counteract global warming: impacts on the hydrological cycle , 2011 .

[24]  M. Webb,et al.  The relationship between land-ocean surface temperature contrast and radiative forcing , 2011 .

[25]  K. Caldeira,et al.  Climate forcing and response to idealized changes in surface latent and sensible heat , 2011 .

[26]  C. Timmreck,et al.  The dependency of geoengineered sulfate aerosol on the emission strategy , 2011 .

[27]  K. Taylor,et al.  The Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) , 2011 .

[28]  B. Kravitz,et al.  Climate effects of high-latitude volcanic eruptions: Role of the time of year , 2011 .

[29]  S. Camargo,et al.  Enhanced spring convective barrier for monsoons in a warmer world? , 2011 .

[30]  Andy Ridgwell,et al.  Assessing the regional disparities in geoengineering impacts , 2010 .

[31]  Naomi Naik,et al.  Thermodynamic and Dynamic Mechanisms for Large-Scale Changes in the Hydrological Cycle in Response to Global Warming* , 2010 .

[32]  John T. Fasullo,et al.  Robust Land–Ocean Contrasts in Energy and Water Cycle Feedbacks* , 2010 .

[33]  O. Boucher,et al.  Geoengineering by stratospheric SO 2 injection: results from the Met Office HadGEM2 climate model and comparison with the Goddard Institute for Space Studies ModelE , 2010 .

[34]  Ken Caldeira,et al.  Importance of carbon dioxide physiological forcing to future climate change , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[35]  Piers M. Forster,et al.  The transient response of global-mean precipitation to increasing carbon dioxide levels , 2010 .

[36]  W. Boos,et al.  Dominant control of the South Asian monsoon by orographic insulation versus plateau heating , 2010, Nature.

[37]  Ray Bert.  Geo-Engineering Climate Change: Environmental Necessity or Pandora's Box? edited by Brian Launder and J. Michael T. Thompson. Cambridge, U.K.: The Cambridge University Press, 2010. , 2010 .

[38]  J. M. T. Thompson,et al.  Geoengineering climate change: environmental necessity or Pandora's box? , 2009 .

[39]  D. Weisenstein,et al.  The impact of geoengineering aerosols on stratospheric temperature and ozone , 2009 .

[40]  Martijn Gough.  Climate change , 2009, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[41]  David T. Bolvin,et al.  Improving the global precipitation record: GPCP Version 2.1 , 2009 .

[42]  Gabriele C. Hegerl,et al.  Risks of Climate Engineering , 2009, Science.

[43]  J. David Neelin,et al.  The Transition to Strong Convection , 2009 .

[44]  Andrew Gettelman,et al.  Impact of geoengineered aerosols on the troposphere and stratosphere , 2009 .

[45]  C. Bretherton,et al.  The University of Washington Shallow Convection and Moist Turbulence Schemes and Their Impact on Climate Simulations with the Community Atmosphere Model , 2009 .

[46]  Jonathan M. Gregory,et al.  A Surface Energy Perspective on Climate Change , 2009 .

[47]  Olivier Boucher,et al.  Carbon dioxide induced stomatal closure increases radiative forcing via a rapid reduction in low cloud , 2009 .

[48]  R. Neale,et al.  The Impact of Convection on ENSO: From a Delayed Oscillator to a Series of Events , 2008 .

[49]  P. Rasch,et al.  An overview of geoengineering of climate using stratospheric sulphate aerosols , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[50]  Georgiy L. Stenchikov,et al.  Regional climate responses to geoengineering with tropical and Arctic SO2 injections , 2008 .

[51]  Paul J. Valdes,et al.  “Sunshade World”: A fully coupled GCM evaluation of the climatic impacts of geoengineering , 2008 .

[52]  K. Taylor,et al.  Impact of geoengineering schemes on the global hydrological cycle , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[53]  Simone Tilmes,et al.  The Sensitivity of Polar Ozone Depletion to Proposed Geoengineering Schemes , 2008, Science.

[54]  Jonathan M. Gregory,et al.  Mechanisms for the land/sea warming contrast exhibited by simulations of climate change , 2008 .

[55]  Philip J. Rasch,et al.  Effects of Convective Momentum Transport on the Atmospheric Circulation in the Community Atmosphere Model, Version 3 , 2008 .

[56]  Jialin Lin,et al.  The Double-ITCZ Problem in IPCC AR4 Coupled GCMs: Ocean–Atmosphere Feedback Analysis , 2007 .

[57]  Kevin E. Trenberth,et al.  Effects of Mount Pinatubo volcanic eruption on the hydrological cycle as an analog of geoengineering , 2007 .

[58]  J. Gregory,et al.  Land/sea warming ratio in response to climate change: IPCC AR4 model results and comparison with observations , 2007 .

[59]  Stefano Schiavon,et al.  Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. , 2007 .

[60]  R. Angel.  Feasibility of cooling the Earth with a cloud of small spacecraft near the inner Lagrange point (L1) , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[61]  B. Soden,et al.  Robust Responses of the Hydrological Cycle to Global Warming , 2006 .

[62]  T. Wigley,et al.  A Combined Mitigation/Geoengineering Approach to Climate Stabilization , 2006, Science.

[63]  P. Crutzen.  Albedo Enhancement by Stratospheric Sulfur Injections: A Contribution to Resolve a Policy Dilemma? , 2006 .

[64]  Bin Wang,et al.  Changes in global monsoon precipitation over the past 56 years , 2006 .

[65]  S. Solomon,et al.  How Often Will It Rain , 2005 .

[66]  G. Zhang,et al.  Effects of modifications to the Zhang-McFarlane convection parameterization on the simulation of the tropical precipitation in the National Center for Atmospheric Research Community Climate Model, version 3 , 2005 .

[67]  Jonathan M. Gregory,et al.  A new method for diagnosing radiative forcing and climate sensitivity , 2004 .

[68]  Ecmwf Newsletter,et al.  EUROPEAN CENTRE FOR MEDIUM-RANGE WEATHER FORECASTS , 2004 .

[69]  J. Janowiak,et al.  The Version 2 Global Precipitation Climatology Project (GPCP) Monthly Precipitation Analysis (1979-Present) , 2003 .

[70]  K. Trenberth,et al.  The changing character of precipitation , 2003 .

[71]  Philip B. Duffy,et al.  Geoengineering Earth's radiation balance to mitigate climate change from a quadrupling of CO2 , 2003 .

[72]  V. Ramaswamy,et al.  Arctic Oscillation response to the 1991 Mount Pinatubo eruption: Effects of volcanic aerosols and ozone depletion , 2002 .

[73]  Alan Robock,et al.  Global cooling after the eruption of Mount Pinatubo: a test of climate feedback by water vapor. , 2002, Science.

[74]  Toru Nozawa,et al.  Importance of Cumulus Parameterization for Precipitation Simulation over East Asia in June , 2001 .

[75]  Ken Caldeira,et al.  Geoengineering Earth's radiation balance to mitigate CO2‐induced climate change , 2000 .

[76]  Kevin E. Trenberth,et al.  Conceptual Framework for Changes of Extremes of the Hydrological Cycle with Climate Change , 1999 .

[77]  M. Chipperfield,et al.  Evidence of substantial ozone depletion in winter 1995/96 over northern Norway , 1997 .

[78]  M. McCormick,et al.  Atmospheric effects of the Mt Pinatubo eruption , 1995, Nature.

[79]  M. Yao,et al.  Efficient Cumulus Parameterization for Long-Term Climate Studies: The GISS Scheme , 1993 .

[80]  Arlin J. Krueger,et al.  Global tracking of the SO2 clouds from the June , 1992 .

[81]  K. Emanuel.  A Scheme for Representing Cumulus Convection in Large-Scale Models , 1991 .

[82]  P. Rowntree,et al.  A Mass Flux Convection Scheme with Representation of Cloud Ensemble Characteristics and Stability-Dependent Closure , 1990 .

[83]  M. Tiedtke.  A Comprehensive Mass Flux Scheme for Cumulus Parameterization in Large-Scale Models , 1989 .

[84]  A. Arakawa,et al.  Interaction of a Cumulus Cloud Ensemble with the Large-Scale Environment, Part I , 1974 .