The association between a nutritional quality index and risk of chronic disease.

BACKGROUND The Overall Nutritional Quality Index (ONQI) algorithm is a nutrient profiling scheme that incorporates more than 30 dietary components, and it aims to rank foods by relative healthfulness. PURPOSE To assess whether diets with a higher ONQI score predict lower risk of major chronic disease risk. METHODS A total of 62,284 healthy women from the Nurses' Health Study and 42,382 healthy men from Health Professionals Follow-Up Study were followed from 1986 to 2006. Dietary data were collected from questionnaires at baseline. Each food was scored by the ONQI algorithm and the average ONQI score for the diet consumed by each participant was computed. Total chronic disease was defined as cardiovascular disease (CVD); cancer; diabetes; and nontrauma death. Data analysis was conducted in 2010. RESULTS A total of 20,004 and 13,520 chronic disease events were documented in women and men, respectively. The ONQI score was inversely associated with risk of total chronic disease, CVD, diabetes, and all-cause mortality (p-trend≤0.01), but not cancer, in both cohorts. Women in the highest compared to lowest quintile of the ONQI score had a relative risk (95% CI) of 0.91 (0.87, 0.95) for chronic disease; 0.79 (0.71, 0.88) for CVD; 0.86 (0.78, 0.96) for diabetes; and 0.90 (0.84, 0.97) for all-cause mortality. Men in the highest compared to lowest quintile of the ONQI score had a relative risk of 0.88 (0.83, 0.93) for chronic disease; 0.77 (0.70, 0.85) for CVD; 0.84 (0.73, 0.96) for diabetes; and 0.89 (0.83, 0.97) for all-cause mortality. CONCLUSIONS Consumption of foods that lead to a higher score for the ONQI scoring system is associated with modestly lower risk of chronic disease and all-cause mortality.

[1]  W. Willett Issues in Analysis and Presentation of Dietary Data , 1998 .

[2]  V. Njike,et al.  Performance characteristics of NuVal and the Overall Nutritional Quality Index (ONQI). , 2010, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[3]  E. Rimm,et al.  The assessment of alcohol consumption by a simple self-administered questionnaire. , 1991, American journal of epidemiology.

[4]  Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus and Other Categories of Glucose Intolerance , 1979, Diabetes.

[5]  V. Azaïs-Braesco,et al.  Nutrient profiling: comparison and critical analysis of existing systems , 2006, Public Health Nutrition.

[6]  David L. Katz,et al.  The Stratification of Foods on the Basis of Overall Nutritional Quality: The Overall Nutritional Quality Index , 2009, American journal of health promotion : AJHP.

[7]  Maurice Smith,et al.  Nutrient profiling schemes: overview and comparative analysis , 2007, European journal of nutrition.

[8]  A. Drewnowski,et al.  Nutrient profiling of foods: creating a nutrient-rich food index. , 2008, Nutrition reviews.

[9]  F. D. Weinfeld,et al.  The National Survey of Stroke. Clinical findings. , 1981, Stroke.

[10]  Hugo A. Katus,et al.  Myocardial infarction redefined--a consensus document of The Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology Committee for the redefinition of myocardial infarction. , 2000, European heart journal.

[11]  T. Lobstein,et al.  Defining and labelling ‘healthy’ and ‘unhealthy’ food , 2008, Public Health Nutrition.

[12]  G A Colditz,et al.  Reproducibility and validity of an expanded self-administered semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire among male health professionals. , 1992, American journal of epidemiology.

[13]  E. Rimm,et al.  A prospective study of parental history of myocardial infarction and coronary artery disease in men. , 1991, The American journal of cardiology.

[14]  D Feskanich,et al.  Reproducibility and validity of food intake measurements from a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire. , 1993, Journal of the American Dietetic Association.

[15]  A. Drewnowski Concept of a nutritious food: toward a nutrient density score. , 2005, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[16]  K. Thygesen,et al.  Erratum: Myocardial infarction redefined - A consensus document of the Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology Committee for the Redefinition of Myocardial Infarction (Journal of the American College of Cardiology (2000) 36 (959-969)) , 2001 .

[17]  W. Willett,et al.  Test of the National Death Index. , 1984, American journal of epidemiology.

[18]  D. Ludwig,et al.  Front-of-package food labels: public health or propaganda? , 2010, JAMA.

[19]  J. Manson,et al.  A prospective study of maturity-onset diabetes mellitus and risk of coronary heart disease and stroke in women. , 1991, Archives of internal medicine.

[20]  W. Willett,et al.  Relative and absolute excess risks of coronary heart disease among women who smoke cigarettes. , 1987, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  Daniel Steffen,et al.  The Smart Choices front-of-package nutrition labeling program: rationale and development of the nutrition criteria. , 2010, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[22]  J S Alpert,et al.  Myocardial infarction redefined--a consensus document of The Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology Committee for the redefinition of myocardial infarction. , 2000, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[23]  P. Scarborough,et al.  Testing nutrient profile models using data from a survey of nutrition professionals , 2007, Public Health Nutrition.

[24]  Timothy D. Lytton Signs of change or clash of symbols? FDA regulation of nutrient profile labeling. , 2009, Health matrix.

[25]  Samuel M. Aanestad,et al.  Where is the science? , 2000, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[26]  Marilyn S Townsend,et al.  Where is the science? What will it take to show that nutrient profiling systems work? , 2010, The American journal of clinical nutrition.