Deep regeneration vs shallow renovation to achieve nearly Zero Energy in existing buildings: Energy saving and economic impact of design solutions in the housing stock of Bologna

Abstract Whilst new nearly Zero Energy (nZE) concepts have been the first priority in the previous decade, in more recent years it has become widely acknowledged that renovating dwellings will have a large impact on the energy use in buildings. Using a simplified calculation method, this paper illustrates the high-energy consumption in several building types within the housing stock in Bologna. Among these, a specific building has been selected as the worst-case for an in-depth investigation. For this building the paper analyses a large set of possible scenarios for renovation –from the more standard operations up to higher levels of facade components’ transformation- as technically feasible solutions to achieve a nearly Zero Energy Building (nZEB). By discussing the economic/energy impact of each scenario, this paper aims at contributing to the debate on deep-versus-shallow renovation in existing buildings. In particular, it attempts at answering the following important research issues: whether the technical feasibility is associated to the economic feasibility in the retrofitting towards nZEBs; to what extent deep renovation and high transformation of buildings is competitive with respect to shallow retrofit; whether non-energy related factors can be considered to properly assess the economic competitiveness. Energy and economic benefits are the main renovation’s objectives in building renovation; nonetheless, non-energy related aspects are also helpful to expand the feasibility of nZEBs retrofit in the current building practises.

[1]  Bertoldi Paolo,et al.  Linee guida - Come sviluppare un Piano di Azione per l'Energia Sostenibile - PAES (Guidebook - How to Develop a Sustainable Energy Action Plan - SEAP) , 2010 .

[2]  Annarita Ferrante,et al.  Zero- and low-energy housing for the Mediterranean climate , 2012 .

[3]  Luigi Marletta,et al.  Cost-effective design solutions for low-rise residential Net ZEBs in Mediterranean climate , 2014 .

[4]  Martin Morelli,et al.  Energy retrofitting of a typical old Danish multi-family building to a “nearly-zero” energy building based on experiences from a test apartment , 2012 .

[5]  M. Assimakopoulos,et al.  On the relation between the energy and social characteristics of the residential sector , 2007 .

[6]  Annarita Ferrante,et al.  Building energy retrofitting in urban areas , 2011 .

[7]  P. Torcellini,et al.  Zero Energy Buildings: A Critical Look at the Definition; Preprint , 2006 .

[8]  Paul Kenny,et al.  From net energy to zero energy buildings: Defining life cycle zero energy buildings (LC-ZEB) , 2010 .

[9]  Halina Szejnwald Brown,et al.  Bounded socio-technical experiments as agents of systemic change: The case of a zero-energy residential building , 2008 .

[10]  Paul Cooper,et al.  Existing building retrofits: Methodology and state-of-the-art , 2012 .

[11]  Kristian Fabbri,et al.  Building and fuel poverty, an index to measure fuel poverty: An Italian case study , 2015 .

[12]  Vítor Leal,et al.  A methodology for economic efficient design of Net Zero Energy Buildings , 2012 .

[13]  Shady Attia,et al.  Simulation-based decision support tool for early stages of zero-energy building design , 2012 .

[14]  Susana Camelo,et al.  How low should be the energy required by a nearly Zero-Energy Building? The load/generation energy balance of Mediterranean housing , 2013 .

[15]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Crisis management in construction and real estate: Conceptual modeling at the micro-, meso- and macro-levels , 2011 .

[16]  Ruchi Choudhary,et al.  Optimum building energy retrofits under technical and economic uncertainty , 2013 .

[17]  Annarita Ferrante,et al.  Energy retrofit to nearly zero and socio-oriented urban environments in the Mediterranean climate , 2014 .

[18]  Karsten Voss,et al.  Net zero energy buildings: A consistent definition framework , 2012 .

[20]  Jorge de Brito,et al.  Refurbishment decision support tools review—Energy and life cycle as key aspects to sustainable refurbishment projects , 2013 .

[21]  F. M. Meijer,et al.  Comparing European residential building stocks: performance, renovation and policy opportunities , 2009 .