The coefficient of restitution of different representative types of granules

Gas fluidised beds have many applications in a wide range of industrial sectors and it is important to be able to predict their performance. This requires, for example, a deeper appreciation of the flow of the particles in such systems using both empirical and numerical methods. The coefficient of restitution is an important collisional parameter that is used in some granular flow models in order to predict the velocities and positions of the particles in fluidised beds. The current paper reports experimental data involving the coefficients of restitution of three different representative types of granule viz. melt, wet and binderless granules. They were measured at various impact velocities and the values were compared with those calculated from different theoretical models based on quasi-static contact mechanics. This required knowledge of the Young's moduli and yield stresses, which were measured quasi-statically using diametric compression. The results show that the current theoretical models for the coefficient of restitution explored here lead to either an over- or an under-estimation of the measured values. The melt granules exhibited the greatest values of the coefficient of restitution, Young's modulus and yield stress. The differences in these values were consistent with the nature of the interparticle bonding for each of the three granule types. A new model for the calculation of the coefficient of restitution of granular material was developed that takes account of the work hardening of the granules during impact. Generally, this model provides an improved prediction of the measured values.

[1]  C. Thornton,et al.  A theoretical model for the stick/bounce behaviour of adhesive, elastic-plastic spheres , 1998 .

[2]  J. Kuipers,et al.  Hydrodynamic modelling of dense gas-fluidised beds: comparison and validation of 3D discrete particle and continuum models , 2004 .

[3]  James D. Litster,et al.  Liquid-bound granule impact deformation and coefficient of restitution , 1998 .

[4]  C. Thornton,et al.  Energy dissipation during normal impact of elastic and elastic-plastic spheres , 2005 .

[5]  Gavin K. Reynolds,et al.  An experimental study of the variability in the properties and quality of wet granules , 2004 .

[6]  Myung Sagong,et al.  Development of a hyperbolic constitutive model for expanded polystyrene (EPS) geofoam under triaxial compression tests , 2004 .

[7]  Paul R. Mort,et al.  Control of agglomerate attributes in a continuous binder-agglomeration process , 2001 .

[8]  Colin Thornton,et al.  How do agglomerates break , 2004 .

[9]  C. Thornton,et al.  Rebound behaviour of spheres for plastic impacts , 2003 .

[10]  Colin Thornton,et al.  Numerical simulations of impact breakage of a spherical crystalline agglomerate , 2000 .

[11]  M. Adams,et al.  Modelling collisions of soft agglomerates at the continuum length scale , 2004 .

[12]  S. L. Rough,et al.  Mechanisms in high-viscosity immersion–granulation , 2005 .

[13]  Mojtaba Ghadiri,et al.  Effect of granule morphology on breakage behaviour during compression , 2004 .

[14]  C. Thornton Coefficient of Restitution for Collinear Collisions of Elastic-Perfectly Plastic Spheres , 1997 .

[15]  Masayuki Horio,et al.  Evaluation of lubrication force on colliding particles for DEM simulation of fluidized beds , 2005 .

[16]  S. C. Hunter Energy absorbed by elastic waves during impact , 1957 .

[17]  M. Adams,et al.  The production of binderless granules and their mechanical characteristics , 2005 .

[18]  Gavin K. Reynolds,et al.  Impact deformation and rebound of wet granules , 2004 .

[19]  Colin Thornton,et al.  Numerical simulations of diametrical compression tests on agglomerates , 2004 .

[20]  S. L. Rough,et al.  Tapping characterisation of high shear mixer agglomerates made with ultra-high viscosity binders , 2003 .

[21]  B. Hoomans Granular dynamics of gas-solid two-phase flows , 2000 .

[22]  D. Tabor Hardness of Metals , 1937, Nature.

[23]  Masayuki Horio,et al.  Binderless granulation—its potential, achievements and future issues , 2003 .

[24]  L. Vu-Quoc,et al.  An elastoplastic contact force–displacement model in the normal direction: displacement–driven version , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[25]  Ian T. Cameron,et al.  Determination of coalescence kernels for high-shear granulation using DEM simulations , 2006 .

[26]  Paul R. Mort,et al.  Scale-up of binder agglomeration processes , 2005 .

[27]  Colin Thornton,et al.  Quasi-static shear deformation of a soft particle system , 2000 .

[28]  L. Vu-Quoc,et al.  Modeling the dependence of the coefficient of restitution on the impact velocity in elasto-plastic collisions , 2002 .

[29]  Bijay K. Mishra,et al.  A preliminary numerical investigation of agglomeration in a rotary drum , 2002 .

[30]  Karen Hapgood,et al.  Nucleation and binder dispersion in wet granulation , 2000 .

[31]  Ahmad H. Kharaz,et al.  The measurement of particle rebound characteristics , 2000 .

[32]  F. Taghipour,et al.  Experimental and computational study of gas¿solid fluidized bed hydrodynamics , 2005 .

[33]  Jpk Seville,et al.  An investigation of the effects on agglomeration of changing the speed of a mechanical mixer , 2000 .

[34]  V. Swaaij,et al.  Hydrodynamic modeling of dense gas-fluidised beds using the kinetic theory of granular flow: effect of coefficient of restitution on bed dynamics , 2000 .

[35]  Mojtaba Ghadiri,et al.  Distinct element analysis of bulk crushing: effect of particle properties and loading rate , 2000 .