What Can You Expect? The Influence of Gender Diversity in Dyads on Work Goal Expectancies and Subsequent Work Commitment

In an experimental study (N = 60) we showed that gender differences play an important role in the extent to which people expect work goal differences between themselves and their collaborating partner. Participants who interact with a same-sex partner expect this person to pursue the same work goal as the self, whereas those who interact with an opposite-sex partner expect this person to have a different work goal to the self. When these expectancies were confirmed, participants felt relatively little disappointment, developed a clear image of their partner, and felt committed toward future collaboration. However, an expectancy violation caused participants to respond relatively negatively on these measures. These effects are discussed in relation to expectancy violation and congruence theory.

[1]  F. Rink.  Diversity as a source of common identity: Towards a social identity framework for studying the effects of diversity in organizations , 2007 .

[2]  Holly Arrow,et al.  Traits, expectations, culture, and clout: The dynamics of diversity in work groups. , 1995 .

[3]  Barbara S. Lawrence,et al.  Perspective---The Black Box of Organizational Demography , 1997 .

[4]  Linda L. Carli,et al.  Nonverbal behavior, gender, and influence. , 1995 .

[5]  Deborah H. Gruenfeld,et al.  Group Composition and Decision Making: How Member Familiarity and Information Distribution Affect Process and Performance , 1996 .

[6]  Karen E. Dill,et al.  Evaluations of Ingroup and Outgroup Members: The Role of Category-Based Expectancy Violation , 1997 .

[7]  G. Stasser,et al.  Pooling of Unshared Information in Group Decision Making: Biased Information Sampling During Discussion , 1985 .

[8]  K. W. Phillips,et al.  The Effects of Categorically Based Expectations on Minority Influence: The Importance of Congruence , 2003, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[9]  Judee K. Burgoon,et al.  Effects of preinteraction expectancies and target communication on perceiver reciprocity and compensation in dyadic interaction , 1995 .

[10]  N. Frijda,et al.  Relations among emotion, appraisal, and emotional action readiness , 1989 .

[11]  Shelley E. Taylor,et al.  Social cognition, 2nd ed. , 1991 .

[12]  Z. Kunda,et al.  When do stereotypes come to mind and when do they color judgment? A goal-based theoretical framework for stereotype activation and application. , 2003, Psychological bulletin.

[13]  M. Biernat,et al.  Black sheep and expectancy violation: integrating two models of social judgment , 1999 .

[14]  Arthur J. Wohlers,et al.  Three – Gender Stereotypes , 1986 .

[15]  D. Byrne.  The Attraction Paradigm , 1971 .

[16]  R. Z. Norman,et al.  The legitimation and delegitimation of power and prestige orders. , 1998 .

[17]  S. Webber,et al.  Impact of highly and less job-related diversity on work group cohesion and performance: a meta-analysis , 2001 .

[18]  B. Lawrence.  The Black Box of Organizational Demography , 1997 .

[19]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Exploring the Black Box: An Analysis of Work Group Diversity, Conflict and Performance , 1999 .

[20]  R. Ashmore,et al.  The Social psychology of female-male relations : a critical analysis of central concepts , 1988 .

[21]  Norman Miller,et al.  Assumed similarity between self and other: Effect of expectation of future interaction with that other. , 1982 .

[22]  Marcel Zeelenberg,et al.  The experience of regret and disappointment. , 1998 .

[23]  Raymond S. Nickerson,et al.  How We Know—and Sometimes Misjudge—What Others Know: Imputing One's Own Knowledge to Others , 1999 .

[24]  Katherine W. Phillips,et al.  When What You Know Is Not Enough: Expertise and Gender Dynamics in Task Groups , 2004, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[25]  J. Berger.  Status Characteristics and Social Interaction: An Expectation-States Approach , 1976 .

[26]  S. Karau,et al.  Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. , 2002, Psychological review.

[27]  Charles A. O'Reilly,et al.  Asymmetric Reactions to Work Group Sex Diversity Among Men and Women , 2004 .

[28]  A. Hollingshead,et al.  Gender Stereotypes and Assumptions about Expertise in Transactive Memory , 2003 .

[29]  Marian N. Ruderman,et al.  Diversity in work teams: Research paradigms for a changing workplace. , 1995 .

[30]  Jennifer J. Dose.  Work values: An integrative framework and illustrative application to organizational socialization , 1997 .

[31]  D. Mook,et al.  In defense of external invalidity. , 1983 .

[32]  Deborah H. Gruenfeld,et al.  Diverse groups and information sharing: The effects of congruent ties. , 2004 .

[33]  C. Cooper,et al.  International review of industrial and organizational psychology , 1986 .

[34]  D. Harrison,et al.  Time, Teams, and Task Performance: Changing Effects of Surface- and Deep-Level Diversity on Group Functioning , 2002 .

[35]  David A. Thomas,et al.  Cultural Diversity at Work: The Effects of Diversity Perspectives on Work Group Processes and Outcomes , 2001 .

[36]  S. Karau,et al.  Gender and the effectiveness of leaders: a meta-analysis. , 1995, Psychological bulletin.

[37]  John D. Benjamin,et al.  The Effects of Sex Composition on Small-Group Performance in a Business School Case Competition MARC ORLITZKY , 2003 .

[38]  S. Jackson,et al.  Recent Research on Team and Organizational Diversity: SWOT Analysis and Implications , 2003 .

[39]  D. Harrison,et al.  Beyond Relational Demography: Time and the Effects of Surface- and Deep-Level Diversity on Work Group Cohesion , 1998 .

[40]  G. Northcraft,et al.  You have printed the following article : Why Differences Make a Difference : A Field Study of Diversity , Conflict , and Performance in Workgroups , 2007 .

[41]  M. Biernat,et al.  Gender- and race-based standards of competence: lower minimum standards but higher ability standards for devalued groups. , 1997, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[42]  Martha Foschi,et al.  Double Standards for Competence: Theory and Research , 2000 .

[43]  T. O. Nelson,et al.  Social Metacognition: An Expansionist Review , 1998, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[44]  G. Mandler,et al.  Constructions of emotion: Discrepancy, arousal, and mood , 1989 .

[45]  Boris W. Becker,et al.  Values and the Organization: Suggestions for Research , 1975 .

[46]  Thomas Eckes,et al.  Bad but bold: Ambivalent attitudes toward men predict gender inequality in 16 nations. , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.