Trends in biotechnology and biosafety in Brazil.

Biotechnology is a Brazilian priority, and has been recognized for its potential to promote sustainable development. The Government recently announced an ambitious program for Science and Technology, which includes strategies to develop modern biotechnology, continuing three decades of public investments on capacity building and infrastructure, aimed principally at the development of technologies applied to health, agriculture and the environment (MCT, 2008). Research initiatives have focused on genomics, proteomics, genetically modified organisms (GMOs), gene therapy, stem cells, bio-fuels and nanotechnology, among other biotechnological topics. Research projects in Brazil have been mainly developed in public universities and institutions funded by federal and state agencies, with a minor participation from the private sector (Silveira et al., 2004). Genomics, an area of considerable success in the country, was launched a decade ago by S. Paulo State Research Foundation (FAPESP), with the organization of a virtual institute, called ONSA, comprising several laboratories with the main task of sequencing the genome of the citrus pathogenic bacterium Xylella fastidiosa (Simpson et al., 2000). The success of this genomic network stimulated biotechnology startup companies and projects with the focus on other genomes, such as sugarcane and coffee, including functional genomics and proteomics. Following in the footsteps of the ONSA network, the Ministry of Science and Technology created a National Genome Project Consortium involving institutions located in the major regions of the country, with the task of sequencing eight microbial and two plant genomes. Recently, they concluded the sequence of Chromobacterium violaceum,

[1]  D. Saxena,et al.  Transgenic plants: Insecticidal toxin in root exudates from Bt corn , 1999, Nature.

[2]  J. Losey,et al.  Transgenic pollen harms monarch larvae , 1999, Nature.

[3]  D. A. Palmieri,et al.  The genome sequence of the plant pathogen Xylella fastidiosa , 2000, Nature.

[4]  J. Obrycki,et al.  Field deposition of Bt transgenic corn pollen: lethal effects on the monarch butterfly , 2000, Oecologia.

[5]  S. Borin,et al.  Horizontal transfer of antibiotic resistance genes from transgenic plants to bacteria - are there new data to fuel the debate? , 2000 .

[6]  T. Vogel,et al.  In Situ Transfer of Antibiotic Resistance Genes from Transgenic (Transplastomic) Tobacco Plants to Bacteria , 2002, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[7]  Ana Tereza Ribeiro de Vasconcelos,et al.  The complete genome sequence of Chromobacterium violaceum reveals remarkable and exploitable bacterial adaptability , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  L G Firbank,et al.  The Farm Scale Evaluations of spring-sown genetically modified crops. Introduction. , 2003, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[9]  Celso Omoto,et al.  Efeito do milho geneticamente modificado MON810 sobre a comunidade de insetos. , 2003 .

[10]  E. Fontes,et al.  Legal and regulatory concerns about transgenic plants in Brazil. , 2003, Journal of invertebrate pathology.

[11]  O. D. Fernandes Efeito do milho geneticamente modificado (Mon810) em Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E.Smith, 1797) e no parasitóide de ovos Trichogramma spp. , 2003 .

[12]  J. Schiemann Co-existence of genetically modified crops with conventional and organic farming. , 2003, Environmental biosafety research.

[13]  Jonathan Gressel,et al.  Molecular biology of weed control , 2002, Transgenic Research.

[14]  Dirk Reheul,et al.  The co-existence between transgenic and non-transgenic maize in the European Union: a focus on pollen flow and cross-fertilization. , 2005, Environmental biosafety research.

[15]  B. Jank,et al.  Co-existence of agricultural production systems. , 2006, Trends in biotechnology.

[16]  O. Fernandes,et al.  Short-term assessment of bt maize on non-target arthropods in Brazil , 2007 .