Effect of substrate on formation and nanofiltration performance of graphene oxide membranes

Abstract Graphene oxide (GO) has been considered as a promising material to develop advanced nanofiltration membranes benefiting from its extraordinary physicochemical properties. GO membranes for practical application need porous substrates to provide sufficient mechanical strength. Compared to extensive studies on the manipulation of GO selective layer, the influence of substrates on the performance of GO membranes has been received much less attention. Actually, significant differences in physical and chemical properties of the substrates should lead to distinct assembly structure of resulting GO membranes with uneven performance. Therefore, the effect of substrate on GO membranes formation and separation are worth study and optimization. Herein, we employed typical inorganic ceramic tube and polymeric polyacrylonitrile (PAN) and polycarbonate (PC) substrates to support GO membranes and studied the effects of their surface morphologies and roughness, surface chemical composition, as well as bulk pore structure on the formation and nanofiltration performance of resulting GO membranes. Substrates properties were revealed to have remarkable impacts on the adhesion and transport property of GO membranes. We found that the surface morphological and chemical structure of substrates induced GO assembly and determined GO adhesion, and the bulk pore structure of substrates dominated the whole transport resistance of GO membrane. Especially, the PAN substrate possessing abundant oxidized functional groups after simple hydrolysis, contributed to a robust interfacial adhesion with GO selective layer and enabled GO membrane to withstand harsh stability measurements including cross-flow, high feed pressure and long-period continuous operation. Besides, the smooth surface morphology along with the bulk highly porous structure of PAN substrate offered a favorable platform for GO assembly, resulting in competitive nanofiltration performance with water permeance of 15.5 Lm−2 h−1bar−1 and dye rejection of 99.5%. Overall, this work gives new insights of design and fabrication of durable GO membranes for practical applications.

[1]  C. Vandecasteele,et al.  Influence of ion size and charge in nanofiltration , 1998 .

[2]  Rui Huang,et al.  Effect of surface roughness on adhesion of graphene membranes , 2011 .

[3]  Jun Wang,et al.  Polyamide/PVC based composite hollow fiber nanofiltration membranes: Effect of substrate on properties and performance , 2016 .

[4]  Jie Shen,et al.  A graphene oxide membrane with highly selective molecular separation of aqueous organic solution. , 2014, Angewandte Chemie.

[5]  Hong-qi Ye,et al.  Graphene oxide for high-efficiency separation membranes: Role of electrostatic interactions , 2016 .

[6]  Yu Zhao,et al.  Ultrathin graphene oxide nanosheet membranes with various d-spacing assembled using the pressure-assisted filtration method for removing natural organic matter , 2015 .

[7]  Wanqin Jin,et al.  Two-Dimensional-Material Membranes: A New Family of High-Performance Separation Membranes. , 2016, Angewandte Chemie.

[8]  Zhiping Xu,et al.  Ultrafast viscous water flow through nanostrand-channelled graphene oxide membranes , 2013, Nature Communications.

[9]  Eric M.V. Hoek,et al.  Preparation and Characterization of Membranes Formed by Nonsolvent Induced Phase Separation: A Review , 2011 .

[10]  Chao Gao,et al.  Ultrathin Graphene Nanofiltration Membrane for Water Purification , 2013 .

[11]  Guojun Zhang,et al.  Hydrolysis differences of polyacrylonitrile support membrane and its influences on polyacrylonitrile-based membrane performance , 2009 .

[12]  Jie Shen,et al.  Subnanometer Two-Dimensional Graphene Oxide Channels for Ultrafast Gas Sieving. , 2016, ACS nano.

[13]  Quan-hong Yang,et al.  On the origin of the stability of graphene oxide membranes in water. , 2015, Nature chemistry.

[14]  Jie Shen,et al.  High‐Efficiency Water‐Transport Channels using the Synergistic Effect of a Hydrophilic Polymer and Graphene Oxide Laminates , 2015 .

[15]  Yulong Ying,et al.  Graphene oxide nanosheet: an emerging star material for novel separation membranes , 2014 .

[16]  Alba Torrents,et al.  Understanding the pH-responsive behavior of graphene oxide membrane in removing ions and organic micropollulants , 2017 .

[17]  A. Ismail,et al.  Study on the thin film composite poly(piperazine-amide) nanofiltration membrane: Impacts of physicochemical properties of substrate on interfacial polymerization formation , 2014 .

[18]  Xueli Gao,et al.  Enhanced desalination performance of carboxyl functionalized graphene oxide nanofiltration membranes , 2017 .

[19]  Thomas P. Russell,et al.  Nanoporous Membranes with Ultrahigh Selectivity and Flux for the Filtration of Viruses , 2006 .

[20]  Eric M.V. Hoek,et al.  A review of water treatment membrane nanotechnologies , 2011 .

[21]  Ming Yang,et al.  Loose ultrafiltration of proteins using hydrolyzed polyacrylonitrile hollow fiber , 1997 .

[22]  Yulong Ying,et al.  Salt concentration, pH and pressure controlled separation of small molecules through lamellar graphene oxide membranes. , 2013, Chemical communications.

[23]  Gongpin Liu,et al.  Nanoparticles@rGO membrane enabling highly enhanced water permeability and structural stability with preserved selectivity , 2017 .

[24]  Rong Wang,et al.  All‐Carbon Nanoarchitectures as High‐Performance Separation Membranes with Superior Stability , 2015 .

[25]  Yijia He,et al.  Strong Adhesion of Graphene Oxide Coating on Polymer Separation Membranes. , 2018, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[26]  Shaofan Li,et al.  Swelling of Graphene Oxide Membranes in Aqueous Solution: Characterization of Interlayer Spacing and Insight into Water Transport Mechanisms. , 2017, ACS nano.

[27]  Y. Cho,et al.  Water and ion sorption, diffusion, and transport in graphene oxide membranes revisited , 2017 .

[28]  Ahmad Fauzi Ismail,et al.  A recent progress in thin film composite membrane: A review , 2012 .

[29]  B. Gupta,et al.  Surface modification of polyacrylonitrile staple fibers via alkaline hydrolysis for superabsorbent applications , 2004 .

[30]  Long-Gui Tang,et al.  A review of methods for improving the interfacial adhesion between carbon fiber and polymer matrix , 1997 .

[31]  Wanqin Jin,et al.  Graphene-based membranes. , 2015, Chemical Society reviews.

[32]  Baoxia Mi,et al.  Enabling graphene oxide nanosheets as water separation membranes. , 2013, Environmental science & technology.

[33]  Bing Zhang,et al.  Preparation and characterization of HPEI-GO/PES ultrafiltration membrane with antifouling and antibacterial properties , 2013 .

[34]  Mengchen Zhang,et al.  3D nanoporous crystals enabled 2D channels in graphene membrane with enhanced water purification performance , 2017 .

[35]  M. Purkait,et al.  Preparation and characterization of low cost ceramic membranes for micro-filtration applications , 2008 .

[36]  T. Xu,et al.  Graphene Oxide as an Effective Barrier on a Porous Nanofibrous Membrane for Water Treatment. , 2016, ACS applied materials & interfaces.

[37]  N. Platé,et al.  Alkaline hydrolysis of polyacrylonitrile. On the reaction mechanism , 2000 .

[38]  Gang Xu,et al.  Ion sieving in graphene oxide membranes via cationic control of interlayer spacing , 2017, Nature.

[39]  Seth B. Darling,et al.  Membrane materials for water purification: design, development, and application , 2016 .

[40]  Yu Zhang,et al.  Nanometric Graphene Oxide Framework Membranes with Enhanced Heavy Metal Removal via Nanofiltration. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.