A Reservoir Analysis of the Denver Earthquakes: A Case of Induced Seismicity (Paper 80B 1095)

Injection of fluid wastes into the fractured Precambrian crystalline bedrock beneath the Rocky Mountain Arsenal near Denver triggered earthquakes in the 1960's. An analysis, based on the assumption that fluid flow in the fractured reservoir can be approximated by flow in a porous medium, is presented. The configuration and hydrologic properties of the reservoir are determined from two lines of evidence: (1) locations of earthquake hypocenters determined by seismic arrays installed at the Arsenal and (2) observed long-term decline in fluid levels in the injection well. Together these two sets of data indicate that a long, narrow reservoir, aligned in the direction N 60/sup 0/W, exists. The reservoir is 3.35 km in width, extends 30.5 km to the northwest and infinitely to the southeast, and spans a depth interval from 3.7 to 7.0 km below land surface. It has a transmissivity of 1.08 x 10/sup -5/ m/sup 2//s and a storage coefficient of 1.0 x 10/sup -5/. Computed pressure buildup along the length of the reservoir is compared with the spatial distribution of earthquake epicenters. The comparison shows that earthquakes are confined to that part of the reservoir where the pressure buildup exceeds 32 bars. This critical value is interpretedmore » as the pressure buildup above which earthquakes occur. The migration of earthquake epicenters away from the injection well, a phenomenon noted by previous investigators, can be accounted for by the outward propagation of the critical pressure buildup. The analysis is extended to examining the effects of rapid flow in fractures opened by high injection pressure. The results show that the effect is confined to a small region within 1 km of the injection well. The existence of a critical pressure buildup above which earthquakes occur is completely consistent with the theory on the role of fluid pressure in fault movement as presented by Hubbert and Rubey.« less

[1]  R. H. Brown,et al.  Theory of aquifer tests , 1962 .

[2]  William Walden Rubey,et al.  The Denver EarthquakeS. , 1968, Science.

[3]  Gregory A. Davis,et al.  ROLE OF FLUID PRESSURE IN MECHANICS OF OVERTHRUST FAULTING: DISCUSSION , 1965 .

[4]  L. Scopel Pressure Injection Disposal Well, Rocky Mountain Arsenal, Denver, Colorado , 1964 .

[5]  William W Rubey,et al.  ROLE OF FLUID PRESSURE IN MECHANICS OF OVERTHRUST FAULTING I. MECHANICS OF FLUID-FILLED POROUS SOLIDS AND ITS APPLICATION TO OVERTHRUST FAULTING , 1959 .

[6]  D. Hoover,et al.  Seismic activity during the 1968 test pumping at the Rocky Mountain Arsenal disposal well , 1969 .

[7]  J. Healy Geophysical and geological investigations relating to earthquakes in the Denver area, Colorado , 1966 .

[8]  J. Bear Hydraulics of Groundwater , 1979 .

[9]  M. King Hubbert,et al.  Mechanics of Hydraulic Fracturing , 1972 .

[10]  E. M. Anderson The dynamics of faulting , 1905, Transactions of the Edinburgh Geological Society.

[11]  C. V. Theis The relation between the lowering of the Piezometric surface and the rate and duration of discharge of a well using ground‐water storage , 1935 .

[12]  J. Bredehoeft,et al.  An Experiment in Earthquake Control at Rangely, Colorado , 1976, Science.

[13]  Ralph O. Kehle,et al.  The determination of tectonic stresses through analysis of hydraulic well fracturing , 1964 .

[14]  H. K. V. Poollen,et al.  Waste Disposal and Earthquakes at the Rocky Mountain Arsenal, Derby, Colorado , 1970 .

[15]  M. Hubbert,et al.  ROLE OF FLUID PRESSURE IN MECHANICS OF OVERTHRUST FAULTING A REPLY , 1959 .

[16]  David M. Evans The Denver Area Earthquakes and The Rocky Mountain Arsenal Disposal Well , 1966 .