The Future of Geomorphology

This article describes a personal perception of a promising way forward for the discipline of geomorphology. Four challenges and potential solutions are identified. First, the intellectual rationale and philosophical basis of geomorphology could benefit by exploring the framework of critical realism, a framework which recognizes that human experience is as real as the existence of elementary particles. Second, greater effort should perhaps be given to defining the ‘natural kinds’ which are the objects of geomorphological study. Third, the balance between geomorphological geohistory and process geomorphology requires constant attention. And fourth, the increasingly anthropogenic nature of landscape requires that geomorphologists reinforce their commitment to environmental conservation and social justice. The net effect of these trends might well increase informed geomorphological commentary on ethical implications of global landform and landscape changes.

[1]  A. Goudie.  Global warming and fluvial geomorphology , 2006 .

[2]  Landscape analysis and the search for geomorphic unity , 1988 .

[3]  B. Wilkinson,et al.  THE IMPACT OF HUMANS ON CONTINENTAL EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION (Invited) , 2007 .

[4]  B. Rhoads.  Beyond Pragmatism: The Value of Philosophical Discourse for Physical Geography , 1999 .

[5]  A. N. Strahler.  DYNAMIC BASIS OF GEOMORPHOLOGY , 1952 .

[6]  Bruce L. Rhoads,et al.  Contemporary philosophical perspectives on physical geography with emphasis on geomorphology , 1994 .

[7]  Keith Richards.  ‘real’ geomorphology revisited , 1994 .

[8]  M. Wolman,et al.  Magnitude and Frequency of Forces in Geomorphic Processes , 1960, The Journal of Geology.

[9]  Roger LeB. Hooke,et al.  Spatial distribution of human geomorphic activity in the United States: comparison with rivers , 1999 .

[10]  C. Keylock.  Mark Melton's geomorphology and geography's quantitative revolution , 2003 .

[11]  R. Gerard,et al.  INTELLIGENCE, INFORMATION, AND EDUCATION. , 1965, Science.

[12]  J. Phillips.  Methodology, Scale, and the Field of Dreams , 1999 .

[13]  Keith S. Montgomery,et al.  METHODOLOGICAL AND SPATIO‐TEMPORAL CONTEXTS FOR GEOMORPHOLOGICAL KNOWLEDGE: ANALYSIS AND IMPLICATIONS , 1991 .

[14]  M. Summerfield,et al.  The changing landscape of geomorphology , 2005 .

[15]  L. H. Cammeraat.  A review of two strongly contrasting geomorphological systems within the context of scale , 2002 .

[16]  B. Rhoads.  The Dynamic Basis of Geomorphology Reenvisioned , 2006 .

[17]  D. M. Mark,et al.  On size and scale in geomorphology , 1980 .

[18]  Victor R. Baker,et al.  The reenchantment of geomorphology , 1991 .

[19]  H. Mooney,et al.  Human Domination of Earth’s Ecosystems , 1997, Renewable Energy.

[20]  D. Sherman.  Methodology in Geomorphology: Traditions and Hypocrisy , 1999 .

[21]  O. Slaymaker.  Why so much concern about climate change and so little attention to land use change , 2001 .

[22]  R. Hooke.  On the history of humans as geomorphic agents , 2000 .

[23]  C. S. Holling.  Understanding the Complexity of Economic, Ecological, and Social Systems , 2001, Ecosystems.

[24]  R. Horton.  EROSIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF STREAMS AND THEIR DRAINAGE BASINS; HYDROPHYSICAL APPROACH TO QUANTITATIVE MORPHOLOGY , 1945 .

[25]  Bernard O. Bauer,et al.  On Methodology in Physical Geography, Current Status, Implications, and Future Prospects , 1999 .

[26]  Ian Douglas.  Geomorphology and geoecology , 1993 .

[27]  M. Melton.  Geometric Properties of Mature Drainage Systems and Their Representation in an E4 Phase Space , 1958, The Journal of Geology.

[28]  Brian Klinkenberg,et al.  Fractals and morphometric measures: is there a relationship? , 1992 .

[29]  B. Rhoads.  On being a ‘real’ geomorphologist , 1994 .

[30]  Jonathan D. Phillips,et al.  Sources of nonlinearity and complexity in geomorphic systems , 2003 .

[31]  J. Harlen Bretz.  Dynamic equilibrium and the Ozark land forms , 1962 .

[32]  J. Syvitski,et al.  Geomorphic/Tectonic Control of Sediment Discharge to the Ocean: The Importance of Small Mountainous Rivers , 1992, The Journal of Geology.

[33]  Olav Slaymaker,et al.  Mutual vulnerability, mutual dependence , 2003 .

[34]  To Make Geomorphology More Scientific , 1992 .

[35]  M. Church,et al.  Fluvial clastic sediment yield in Canada: scaled analysis , 1999 .

[36]  B. Rhoads,et al.  Geomorphology as science: the role of theory , 1993 .

[37]  O. Slaymaker.  Towards the identification of scaling relations in drainage basin sediment budgets , 2006 .

[38]  S. Schumm,et al.  Time, space, and causality in geomorphology , 1965 .

[39]  R. Huggett.  Terrestrial catastrophism , 1988 .

[40]  R. Chorley,et al.  Geomorphology and general systems theory , 1962 .

[41]  R. Hartshorne.  On the Mores of Methodological Discussion in American Geography , 1948 .