Machine learning based methodology to identify cell shape phenotypes associated with microenvironmental cues.

Cell morphology has been identified as a potential indicator of stem cell response to biomaterials. However, determination of cell shape phenotype in biomaterials is complicated by heterogeneous cell populations, microenvironment heterogeneity, and multi-parametric definitions of cell morphology. To associate cell morphology with cell-material interactions, we developed a shape phenotyping framework based on support vector machines. A feature selection procedure was implemented to select the most significant combination of cell shape metrics to build classifiers with both accuracy and stability to identify and predict microenvironment-driven morphological differences in heterogeneous cell populations. The analysis was conducted at a multi-cell level, where a "supercell" method used average shape measurements of small groups of single cells to account for heterogeneous populations and microenvironment. A subsampling validation algorithm revealed the range of supercell sizes and sample sizes needed for classifier stability and generalization capability. As an example, the responses of human bone marrow stromal cells (hBMSCs) to fibrous vs flat microenvironments were compared on day 1. Our analysis showed that 57 cells (grouped into supercells of size 4) are the minimum needed for phenotyping. The analysis identified that a combination of minor axis length, solidity, and mean negative curvature were the strongest early shape-based indicator of hBMSCs response to fibrous microenvironment.

[1]  M. Textor,et al.  Differential regulation of osteogenic differentiation of stem cells on surface roughness gradients. , 2014, Biomaterials.

[2]  Sorin Draghici,et al.  Machine Learning and Its Applications to Biology , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[3]  Wolfgang Losert,et al.  Understanding health and disease with multidimensional single-cell methods , 2013, Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal.

[4]  Ian H. Witten,et al.  Chapter 4 – Algorithms: The Basic Methods , 2011 .

[5]  Hiroyuki Honda,et al.  Characterization of Time-Course Morphological Features for Efficient Prediction of Osteogenic Potential in Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells , 2014, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[6]  Matt J. Kipper,et al.  Osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow stromal cells on poly(epsilon-caprolactone) nanofiber scaffolds. , 2010, Acta biomaterialia.

[7]  Wolfgang Losert,et al.  Cell Shape Dynamics: From Waves to Migration , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[8]  Mark Bernstein,et al.  Glioma stem cell lines expanded in adherent culture have tumor-specific phenotypes and are suitable for chemical and genetic screens. , 2009, Cell stem cell.

[9]  Hiroto Sasaki,et al.  Label-Free Morphology-Based Prediction of Multiple Differentiation Potentials of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Early Evaluation of Intact Cells , 2014, PloS one.

[10]  P. Ma,et al.  Chondrogenic and osteogenic differentiations of human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells on a nanofibrous scaffold with designed pore network. , 2009, Biomaterials.

[11]  D. Odde,et al.  Potential for Control of Signaling Pathways via Cell Size and Shape , 2006, Current Biology.

[12]  Wolfgang Losert,et al.  Automated image analysis of nuclear shape: What can we learn from a prematurely aged cell? , 2012, Aging.

[13]  V. Johnson Revised standards for statistical evidence , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  Lior Shamir,et al.  Pattern Recognition Software and Techniques for Biological Image Analysis , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[15]  Girish Kumar,et al.  The determination of stem cell fate by 3D scaffold structures through the control of cell shape. , 2011, Biomaterials.

[16]  Ross A. Marklein,et al.  High Content Imaging of Early Morphological Signatures Predicts Long Term Mineralization Capacity of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells upon Osteogenic Induction , 2016, Stem cells.

[17]  Kinneret Keren,et al.  The Shape of Motile Cells , 2009, Current Biology.

[18]  M. Hussain,et al.  Continuing differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells and induced chondrogenic and osteogenic lineages in electrospun PLGA nanofiber scaffold. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[19]  Milan Mrksich,et al.  Subcellular curvature at the perimeter of micropatterned cells influences lamellipodial distribution and cell polarity. , 2008, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[20]  Christopher S. Chen,et al.  Cell shape, cytoskeletal tension, and RhoA regulate stem cell lineage commitment. , 2004, Developmental cell.

[21]  Christopher K. Tison,et al.  Measuring stem cell dimensionality in tissue scaffolds. , 2014, Biomaterials.

[22]  Hiroyuki Honda,et al.  Morphology-Based Prediction of Osteogenic Differentiation Potential of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells , 2013, PloS one.

[23]  J. Stuart Aitken,et al.  Feature selection and classification for microarray data analysis: Evolutionary methods for identifying predictive genes , 2005, BMC Bioinformatics.

[24]  Joachim Kohn,et al.  Cytoskeleton-based forecasting of stem cell lineage fates , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  Sean X. Sun,et al.  Functional interplay between the cell cycle and cell phenotypes. , 2013, Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro.

[26]  Teuvo Kohonen,et al.  Self-Organizing Maps, Third Edition , 2001, Springer Series in Information Sciences.

[27]  Regina Nuzzo,et al.  Scientific method: Statistical errors , 2014, Nature.

[28]  Karl Pearson F.R.S. LIII. On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space , 1901 .

[29]  F. Guilak,et al.  Control of stem cell fate by physical interactions with the extracellular matrix. , 2009, Cell stem cell.

[30]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Cell shape provides global control of focal adhesion assembly. , 2003, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[31]  Lani F. Wu,et al.  Cellular Heterogeneity: Do Differences Make a Difference? , 2010, Cell.

[32]  Tong Zhang,et al.  An Introduction to Support Vector Machines and Other Kernel-Based Learning Methods , 2001, AI Mag..

[33]  Y. Miao,et al.  Stimulation of osteogenic differentiation and inhibition of adipogenic differentiation in bone marrow stromal cells by alendronate via ERK and JNK activation. , 2008, Bone.

[34]  Girish Kumar,et al.  Freeform fabricated scaffolds with roughened struts that enhance both stem cell proliferation and differentiation by controlling cell shape. , 2012, Biomaterials.

[35]  Nello Cristianini,et al.  An Introduction to Support Vector Machines and Other Kernel-based Learning Methods , 2000 .

[36]  Masoud Nikravesh,et al.  Feature Extraction: Foundations and Applications (Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing) , 2006 .

[37]  Christopher R Jacobs,et al.  Mechanically induced osteogenic differentiation – the role of RhoA, ROCKII and cytoskeletal dynamics , 2009, Journal of Cell Science.

[38]  E. Balzer,et al.  Microtentacles tip the balance of cytoskeletal forces in circulating tumor cells. , 2010, Cancer research.

[39]  D. Schaffer,et al.  Biophysical regulation of epigenetic state and cell reprogramming. , 2013, Nature materials.

[40]  Junaed Sattar Snakes , Shapes and Gradient Vector Flow , 2022 .

[41]  Teuvo Kohonen,et al.  Self-Organizing Maps , 2010 .

[42]  Wolfgang Losert,et al.  From Cellular Characteristics to Disease Diagnosis: Uncovering Phenotypes with Supercells , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[43]  Qinghua Hu,et al.  Improved Feature Selection Algorithm Based on SVM and Correlation , 2006, ISNN.

[44]  A. Hartwig,et al.  Nucleation as a new concept for morphology adjustment of crystalline thermosetting epoxy polymers , 2013 .

[45]  Michael R. Lyu,et al.  Methods of Decreasing the Number of Support Vectors via k-Mean Clustering , 2005, ICIC.

[46]  Richard Tuli,et al.  Multilineage differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells in a three-dimensional nanofibrous scaffold. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[47]  A. Bruinink,et al.  Evaluation of early stage human bone marrow stromal proliferation, cell migration and osteogenic differentiation on μ-MIM structured stainless steel surfaces , 2013, Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine.

[48]  Erik S. Welf,et al.  Directional persistence of cell migration coincides with stability of asymmetric intracellular signaling. , 2010, Biophysical journal.

[49]  Dorian Liepmann,et al.  Cell-shape regulation of smooth muscle cell proliferation. , 2009, Biophysical journal.

[50]  Daniela M. Witten,et al.  An Introduction to Statistical Learning: with Applications in R , 2013 .

[51]  M. Reinders,et al.  High content imaging in the screening of biomaterial-induced MSC behavior. , 2013, Biomaterials.

[52]  Christopher S. Chen,et al.  Activation of ROCK by RhoA is regulated by cell adhesion, shape, and cytoskeletal tension. , 2007, Experimental cell research.

[53]  D. Docheva,et al.  Researching into the cellular shape, volume and elasticity of mesenchymal stem cells, osteoblasts and osteosarcoma cells by atomic force microscopy , 2007, Journal of cellular and molecular medicine.

[54]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[55]  Jianping Fu,et al.  Cell shape and substrate rigidity both regulate cell stiffness. , 2011, Biophysical journal.

[56]  Tom Downs,et al.  Exact Simplification of Support Vector Solutions , 2002, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[57]  Kshitiz,et al.  Spatial control of adult stem cell fate using nanotopographic cues. , 2014, Biomaterials.

[58]  A. Ho,et al.  Heterogeneity of mesenchymal stromal cell preparations. , 2008, Cytotherapy.

[59]  Milan Mrksich,et al.  Geometric cues for directing the differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.