Mapping Meritocracy: Intersecting Gender, Poverty and Higher Educational Opportunity Structures

Widening participation in higher education can be a force for democratization. It can also map on to elite practices and contribute to further differentiation of social groups. Those with social capital are often able to decode and access new educational opportunities. Those without it can remain untouched by initiatives to facilitate their entry into the privileges that higher education can offer. This article is based on our ESRC/DFID-funded research project on Widening Participation in Higher Education in Ghana and Tanzania: Developing an Equity Scorecard (www.sussex.ac.uk/education/wideningparticipation). Meritocratic discourse infers that individual achievement is the most important principle determining access and success in higher education. The project is statistically and discursively deconstructing merit. We are mapping meritocracy in order to identify if the most marginalized communities are being included in the widening participation agenda. In this article, we demonstrate how current opportunity structures reflect traditional beliefs about meritocracy and reproduce privilege and exclusion. We argue that when gender is intersected with socio-economic status, participation rates of poorer women are seen to be extremely low in both African countries.

[1]  J. Apps.  Whispers of Change , 1994 .

[2]  Valerie Walkerdine.  Reclassifying Upward Mobility: Femininity and the neo-liberal subject , 2003 .

[3]  Kathrin Zippel,et al.  The Politics of Sexual Harassment: A Comparative Study of the United States, the European Union, and Germany , 2006 .

[4]  M. Dunn.  Where Are All the Women? , 2002 .

[5]  Gaby Weiner,et al.  Feminisms in Education: An Introduction , 1994 .

[6]  Carole Leathwood,et al.  Gender and the Changing Face of Higher Education: A Feminized Future? , 2008 .

[7]  D. Reay,et al.  Different strokes for different folks: diverse students in diverse institutions – experiences of higher education , 2008 .

[8]  S. Franks.  Our Common Interest: Report of the Commission for Africa , 2005 .

[9]  David Post,et al.  World Bank okays public interest in higher education , 2004 .

[10]  K. Kibayashi,et al.  [Forensic medicine in Dar-es-Salaam, United Republic of Tanzania]. , 1998, Nihon hoigaku zasshi = The Japanese journal of legal medicine.

[11]  Kathrin Zippel,et al.  The politics of sexual harassment , 2006 .

[12]  L. McCall.  The Complexity of Intersectionality , 2005, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society.

[13]  M. David.  Equity and diversity: towards a sociology of higher education for the twenty‐first century? , 2007 .

[14]  M. Evans.  The Woman Question , 1980 .

[15]  D. Reay,et al.  Gender Issues in Parental Involvement in Student Choices of Higher Education , 2003 .

[16]  Valerie Walkerdine.  Counting Girls Out , 1989 .

[17]  D. Reay,et al.  Degrees of Choice: social class, race and gender in higher education , 2005 .

[18]  K. Davis.  Intersectionality as buzzword , 2008 .

[19]  Ange-Marie Hancock,et al.  When Multiplication Doesn't Equal Quick Addition: Examining Intersectionality as a Research Paradigm , 2007, Perspectives on Politics.

[20]  C. Dyhouse.  The British federation of university women and the status of women in universities, 1907-1939 , 1995 .

[21]  M. Dunne,et al.  Gender violence in schools in the developing world , 2006 .

[22]  Barbara Crossouard,et al.  A socio‐cultural theorisation of formative assessment , 2008 .

[23]  D. Hosni,et al.  Higher education in developing countries: peril and promise: The Task Force on Higher Education and Society. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank, 2000, 135 pp. Price: $20.00 (paper) , 2004 .

[24]  L. Morley,et al.  Democratising higher education in Ghana and Tanzania: Opportunity structures and social inequalities , 2009 .

[25]  E. Bensimon.  The Diversity Scorecard: A Learning Approach to Institutional Change , 2004 .

[26]  Yasmin Hussain,et al.  Moving On Up: South Asian Women and Higher Education , 2007 .

[27]  M. Pearson,et al.  Women and men in OECD countries , 2007 .

[28]  L. Eyre.  The Discursive Framing of Sexual Harassment in a University Community , 2000 .

[29]  Jocey Quinn.  Powerful Subjects: Are Women Really Taking Over the University , 2003 .

[30]  R. Burke,et al.  Women and minorities in science, technology, engineering and mathematics : upping the numbers , 2007 .

[31]  C. Lapping.  Antagonism and overdetermination: the production of student positions in contrasting undergraduate disciplines and institutions in the United Kingdom , 2005 .

[32]  Heather Mendick.  A beautiful myth? The gendering of being/doing ‘good at maths’ , 2005 .

[33]  J. Boaler.  Reclaiming School Mathematics: The girls fight back , 1997 .

[34]  K. Crenshaw.  Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics , 1989 .

[35]  Andrew R.J. Dainty,et al.  The Good, the Bad and the Ugly: Women Engineering Students’ Experiences of UK Higher Education , 2007 .

[36]  R. Burke,et al.  Women in Management Worldwide: facts, figures and analysis - an overview , 2003 .

[37]  L. Archer.  Social class and higher education , 2005 .

[38]  H. Lund.  A Single Sex Profession? Female Staff Numbers in Commonwealth Universities. , 1998 .

[39]  L. Burton.  Girls into Maths Can Go , 1986 .

[40]  Amartya Sen,et al.  Missing women--revisited. , 2003, BMJ.

[41]  L. Archer,et al.  Higher Education and Social Class : Issues of Exclusion and Inclusion , 2003 .

[42]  K. Paton,et al.  Network‐based ambivalence and educational decision‐making: a case study of ‘non‐participation’ in higher education , 2008 .