Energy-efficient forwarding strategies for geographic routing in lossy wireless sensor networks

Recent experimental studies have shown that wireless links in real sensor networks can be extremely unreliable, deviating to a large extent from the idealized perfect-reception-within-range models used in common network simulation tools. Previously proposed geographic routing protocols commonly employ a maximum-distance greedy forwarding technique that works well in ideal conditions. However, such a forwarding technique performs poorly in realistic conditions as it tends to forward packets on lossy links. We identify and illustrate this weak-link problem and the related distance-hop trade-off, whereby energy efficient geographic forwarding must strike a balance between shorter, high-quality links, and longer lossy links. The study is done for scenarios with and without automatic repeat request (ARQ). Based on an analytical link loss model, we study the distance-hop trade-off via mathematical analysis and extensive simulations of a wide array of blacklisting/link-selection strategies; we also validate some strategies using a set of real experiments on motes. Our analysis, simulations and experiments all show that the product of the packet reception rate (PRR) and the distance traversed towards destination is the optimal forwarding metric for the ARQ case, and is a good metric even without ARQ. Nodes using this metric often take advantage of neighbors in the transitional region (high-variance links). Our results also show that reception-based forwarding strategies are more efficient than purely distance-based strategies; relative blacklisting schemes reduce disconnections and achieve higher delivery rates than absolute blacklisting schemes; and that ARQ schemes become more important in larger networks.

[1]  Ivan Stojmenovic,et al.  Routing with Guaranteed Delivery in Ad Hoc Wireless Networks , 1999, DIALM '99.

[2]  David E. Culler,et al.  Taming the underlying challenges of reliable multihop routing in sensor networks , 2003, SenSys '03.

[3]  Calvin Newport,et al.  The mistaken axioms of wireless-network research , 2003 .

[4]  Brad Karp,et al.  GPSR: greedy perimeter stateless routing for wireless networks , 2000, MobiCom '00.

[5]  Martin Mauve,et al.  A survey on position-based routing in mobile ad hoc networks , 2001, IEEE Netw..

[6]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  Statistical model of lossy links in wireless sensor networks , 2005, IPSN 2005. Fourth International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, 2005..

[7]  Theodore S. Rappaport,et al.  Wireless communications - principles and practice , 1996 .

[8]  Gregory G. Finn,et al.  Routing and Addressing Problems in Large Metropolitan-Scale Internetworks. ISI Research Report. , 1987 .

[9]  Marco Zuniga,et al.  Analyzing the transitional region in low power wireless links , 2004, 2004 First Annual IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks, 2004. IEEE SECON 2004..

[10]  Gang Zhou,et al.  Impact of radio irregularity on wireless sensor networks , 2004, MobiSys '04.

[11]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  SCALE: A tool for Simple Connectivity Assessment in Lossy Environments , 2003 .

[12]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  Complex Behavior at Scale: An Experimental Study of Low-Power Wireless Sensor Networks , 2002 .

[13]  Roger Wattenhofer,et al.  Worst-Case optimal and average-case efficient geometric ad-hoc routing , 2003, MobiHoc '03.

[14]  Ahmed Helmy,et al.  Geographic Protocols in Sensor Networks , 2004 .

[15]  Jorge Urrutia,et al.  Compass routing on geometric networks , 1999, CCCG.

[16]  Ramesh Govindan,et al.  Understanding packet delivery performance in dense wireless sensor networks , 2003, SenSys '03.

[17]  Robert Tappan Morris,et al.  a high-throughput path metric for multi-hop wireless routing , 2003, MobiCom '03.