TRUS–MRI image registration: a paradigm shift in the diagnosis of significant prostate cancer

Accuracy of multiparametric MRI has greatly improved the ability of localizing tumor foci of prostate cancer. This property can be used to perform a TRUS–MR image registration, new technological advance, which allows for an overlay of an MRI onto a TRUS image to target a prostate biopsy toward a suspicious area Three types of registration have been developed: cognitive-based, sensor-based, and organ-based registration. Cognitive registration consists of aiming a suspicious area during biopsy with the knowledge of the lesion location identified on multiparametric MRI. Sensor-based registration consists of tracking in real time the TRUS probe with a magnetic device, achieving a global positioning system which overlays in real-time prostate image on both modalities. Its main limitation is that it does not take into account prostate and patient motion during biopsy. Two systems (Artemis and Uronav) have been developed to partially circumvent this drawback. Organ-based registration (Koelis) does not aim to track the TRUS probe, but the prostate itself to compute in a 3D acquisition the TRUS prostate shape, allowing for a registration with the corresponding 3D MRI shape. This system is not limited by prostate/patient motion and allows for a deformation of the organ during registration. Pros and cons of each technique and the rationale for a targeted biopsy only policy are discussed.

[1]  M. Schocke,et al.  Comparison of Real‐time Sonoelastography With T2‐Weighted Endorectal Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer Detection , 2011, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[2]  Thomas Hambrock,et al.  Prostate cancer: multiparametric MR imaging for detection, localization, and staging. , 2011, Radiology.

[3]  P. Mozer,et al.  Validation of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology scoring system for prostate cancer diagnosis on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in a cohort of repeat biopsy patients. , 2012, European urology.

[4]  Bernd Hamm,et al.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and pharmacokinetic models in prostate cancer , 2011, European Radiology.

[5]  Aaron Fenster,et al.  Clinical application of a 3D ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy system. , 2011, Urologic oncology.

[6]  T. Stamey,et al.  Secondary Cancers in the Prostate Do Not Determine PSA Biochemical Failure in Untreated Men Undergoing Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy , 2001, European Urology.

[7]  Xavier Leroy,et al.  Prostate cancer diagnosis: multiparametric MR-targeted biopsy with cognitive and transrectal US-MR fusion guidance versus systematic biopsy--prospective multicenter study. , 2013, Radiology.

[8]  P. Choyke,et al.  Real-time MRI-TRUS fusion for guidance of targeted prostate biopsies , 2008, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[9]  G. Andriole Image-Guided Prostate Biopsy Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging–Derived Targets: A Systematic Review: Moore CM, Robertson NL, Arsanious N, et al (Univ College London, UK; Croydon Univ Hosp, London, UK; et al) Eur Urol 63:125-140, 2013 § , 2013 .

[10]  Naira Muradyan,et al.  Prebiopsy magnetic resonance imaging and prostate cancer detection: comparison of random and targeted biopsies. , 2013, The Journal of urology.

[11]  S. Verma,et al.  The feasibility of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for targeted biopsy using novel navigation systems to detect early stage prostate cancer: the preliminary experience. , 2013, Journal of endourology.

[12]  Yipeng Hu,et al.  A biopsy simulation study to assess the accuracy of several transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS)‐biopsy strategies compared with template prostate mapping biopsies in patients who have undergone radical prostatectomy , 2012, BJU international.

[13]  J. Battermann,et al.  Measurement of prostate rotation during insertion of needles for brachytherapy. , 2005, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[14]  François Cornud,et al.  Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for the detection and localization of prostate cancer: combination of T2‐weighted, dynamic contrast‐enhanced and diffusion‐weighted imaging , 2011, BJU international.

[15]  Jocelyne Troccaz,et al.  Automated segmentation of the prostate in 3D MR images using a probabilistic atlas and a spatially constrained deformable model. , 2010, Medical physics.

[16]  A. Haese*,et al.  Currently used criteria for active surveillance in men with low‐risk prostate cancer , 2008, Cancer.

[17]  J. Fütterer,et al.  ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012 , 2012, European Radiology.

[18]  Shyam Natarajan,et al.  Targeted biopsy in the detection of prostate cancer using an office based magnetic resonance ultrasound fusion device. , 2013, The Journal of urology.

[19]  Jocelyne Troccaz,et al.  Prostate biopsy tracking with deformation estimation , 2011, Medical Image Anal..

[20]  A. Evans,et al.  ‘Prostatic evasive anterior tumours’: the role of magnetic resonance imaging , 2010, BJU international.

[21]  Monish Aron,et al.  3-Dimensional elastic registration system of prostate biopsy location by real-time 3-dimensional transrectal ultrasound guidance with magnetic resonance/transrectal ultrasound image fusion. , 2012, The Journal of urology.

[22]  Osamu Ukimura,et al.  Intraprostatic targeting , 2012, Current opinion in urology.

[23]  Eduard Baco,et al.  MRI and ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy using soft image fusion. , 2012, Anticancer research.

[24]  Baris Turkbey,et al.  Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound fusion biopsy detect prostate cancer in patients with prior negative transrectal ultrasound biopsies. , 2012, The Journal of urology.

[25]  D Andrew Loblaw,et al.  Increasing hospital admission rates for urological complications after transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy. , 2010, The Journal of urology.

[26]  Mark Emberton,et al.  Image-guided prostate biopsy using magnetic resonance imaging-derived targets: a systematic review. , 2013, European urology.

[27]  Peter Guion,et al.  Initial clinical experience with real‐time transrectal ultrasonography‐magnetic resonance imaging fusion‐guided prostate biopsy , 2008, BJU international.

[28]  Shyam Natarajan,et al.  Value of targeted prostate biopsy using magnetic resonance-ultrasound fusion in men with prior negative biopsy and elevated prostate-specific antigen. , 2014, European urology.

[29]  Ashutosh Kumar Singh,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging‐directed transrectal ultrasonography‐guided biopsies in patients at risk of prostate cancer , 2007, BJU international.

[30]  Adam S. Kibel,et al.  Screening and Prostate-Cancer Mortality in a Randomized European Study , 2009 .

[31]  Jan van der Meulen,et al.  Multiparametric MR imaging for detection of clinically significant prostate cancer: a validation cohort study with transperineal template prostate mapping as the reference standard. , 2013, Radiology.

[32]  Mark A Rubin,et al.  Evaluating localized prostate cancer and identifying candidates for focal therapy. , 2008, Urology.

[33]  Clare Allen,et al.  Is it time to consider a role for MRI before prostate biopsy? , 2009, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.

[34]  Thomas Hambrock,et al.  Simulated required accuracy of image registration tools for targeting high-grade cancer components with prostate biopsies , 2013, European Radiology.

[35]  Thomas Hambrock,et al.  Prospective assessment of prostate cancer aggressiveness using 3-T diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging-guided biopsies versus a systematic 10-core transrectal ultrasound prostate biopsy cohort. , 2012, European urology.

[36]  D. Collins,et al.  Diffusion-weighted MRI in the body: applications and challenges in oncology. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[37]  Guided e-MRI prostate biopsy can solve the discordance between Gleason score biopsy and radical prostatectomy pathology. , 2010, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[38]  Johan Braeckman,et al.  Detection, localisation and characterisation of prostate cancer by Prostate HistoScanning™ , 2012, BJU international.

[39]  S. Fosså,et al.  Concordance between Gleason scores of needle biopsies and radical prostatectomy specimens: a population‐based study , 2009, BJU international.

[40]  Pingkun Yan,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion guided prostate biopsy improves cancer detection following transrectal ultrasound biopsy and correlates with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. , 2011, The Journal of urology.

[41]  Aaron Fenster,et al.  Mechanically assisted 3D ultrasound guided prostate biopsy system. , 2008, Medical physics.

[42]  G. Haber,et al.  Role of magnetic resonance imaging before initial biopsy: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging‐targeted and systematic biopsy for significant prostate cancer detection , 2011, BJU international.

[43]  G. Bartsch,et al.  Prostate cancer detection in men with prostate specific antigen 4 to 10 ng/ml using a combined approach of contrast enhanced color Doppler targeted and systematic biopsy. , 2005, The Journal of urology.

[44]  I. Gill,et al.  Current progress on augmented reality visualization in endoscopic surgery , 2012, Current opinion in urology.