Personalized Models for Injected Activity Levels in SPECT Myocardial Perfusion Imaging

We propose a patient-specific (“personalized”) approach for tailoring the injected activities to individual patients in order to achieve dose reduction in SPECT-myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI). First, we develop a strategy to determine the minimum dose levels required for each patient in a large set of clinical acquisitions (857 subjects) such that the reconstructed images are sufficiently similar to that obtained at conventional clinical dose. We then apply machine learning models to predict the required dose levels on an individual basis based on a set of patient attributes which include body measurements and various clinical variables. We demonstrate the personalized dose models for two commonly used reconstruction methods in clinical SPECT-MPI: 1) conventional filtered backprojection (FBP) with post-filtering and 2) ordered-subsets expectation-maximization (OS-EM) with corrections for attenuation, scatter and resolution, and evaluate their performance in perfusion-defect detection by using the clinical Quantitative Perfusion SPECT software package. The results indicate that the achieved dose reduction can vary greatly among individuals from their conventional clinical dose and that the personalized dose models can achieve further reduction on average compared with a global (non-patient specific) dose reduction approach. In particular, the average personalized dose level can be reduced to 58% and 54% of the full clinical dose, respectively, for FBP and OS-EM reconstruction, while without deteriorating the accuracy in perfusion-defect detection. Furthermore, with the average personalized dose further reduced to only 16% of full dose, OS-EM can still achieve a detection accuracy level comparable to that of FBP with full dose.

[1]  Håkan Arheden,et al.  The radiation dose to overweighted patients undergoing myocardial perfusion SPECT can be significantly reduced: validation of a linear weight-adjusted activity administration protocol , 2017, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology.

[2]  N. Zafrir,et al.  Feasibility of myocardial perfusion imaging with half the radiation dose using ordered-subset expectation maximization with resolution recovery software , 2012, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology.

[3]  Michael A. King,et al.  CHAPTER 22 – Attenuation, Scatter, and Spatial Resolution Compensation in SPECT , 2004 .

[4]  Michael A. King,et al.  Evaluation of a strategy to find personalized, patient-specific injected activity levels for SPECT-MPI , 2017, 2017 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (NSS/MIC).

[5]  Piotr J Slomka,et al.  Investigation of dose reduction in cardiac perfusion SPECT via optimization and choice of the image reconstruction strategy , 2018, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology.

[6]  K. Ogawa,et al.  A practical method for position-dependent Compton-scatter correction in single photon emission CT. , 1991, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[7]  Andrew J Einstein,et al.  ASNC imaging guidelines for SPECT nuclear cardiology procedures: Stress, protocols, and tracers , 2016, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology.

[8]  Leslee J Shaw,et al.  Nationwide Laboratory Adherence to Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Radiation Dose Reduction Practices: A Report From the Intersocietal Accreditation Commission Data Repository. , 2015, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[9]  M. King,et al.  4D reconstruction for low-dose cardiac gated SPECT. , 2013, Medical physics.

[10]  Guobao Wang,et al.  PET Image Reconstruction Using Kernel Method , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[11]  Edward P. Ficaro,et al.  Recommendations for reducing radiation exposure in myocardial perfusion imaging , 2010, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[12]  Michael A. King,et al.  Comparison of methods of acquiring attenuation maps for cardiac SPECT in the presence of respiratory motion , 2013, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology.

[13]  Eric C Frey,et al.  An investigation of the trade-off between the count level and image quality in myocardial perfusion SPECT using simulated images: the effects of statistical noise and object variability on defect detectability , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[14]  L. Tanoue Computed Tomography — An Increasing Source of Radiation Exposure , 2009 .

[15]  D. Basak,et al.  Support Vector Regression , 2008 .

[16]  D. Broga,et al.  Ionizing Radiation Exposure of the Population of the United States , 2009 .

[17]  Michael A. King,et al.  Improved image quality and computation reduction in 4-D reconstruction of cardiac-gated SPECT images , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[18]  Linda K. Shaw,et al.  Clinical results of a novel wide beam reconstruction method for shortening scan time of Tc-99m cardiac SPECT perfusion studies , 2007, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[19]  Albert Flotats,et al.  Current worldwide nuclear cardiology practices and radiation exposure: results from the 65 country IAEA Nuclear Cardiology Protocols Cross-Sectional Study (INCAPS) , 2015, European heart journal.

[20]  M. King,et al.  Human-observer receiver-operating-characteristic evaluation of attenuation, scatter, and resolution compensation strategies for (99m)Tc myocardial perfusion imaging. , 2003, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[21]  E. Depuey,et al.  Wide beam reconstruction “quarter-time” gated myocardial perfusion SPECT functional imaging: a comparison to “full-time” ordered subset expectation maximum , 2009, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[22]  Jinghan Ye,et al.  CBCT-subsystem performance of the multi-modality Brightview XCT system (M09-26) , 2009, 2009 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (NSS/MIC).

[23]  Ron Kohavi,et al.  A Study of Cross-Validation and Bootstrap for Accuracy Estimation and Model Selection , 1995, IJCAI.

[24]  H. Malcolm Hudson,et al.  Accelerated image reconstruction using ordered subsets of projection data , 1994, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[25]  A. Kelion,et al.  A qualitative and quantitative assessment of the impact of three processing algorithms with halving of study count statistics in myocardial perfusion imaging: filtered backprojection, maximal likelihood expectation maximisation and ordered subset expectation maximisation with resolution recovery , 2012, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology.

[26]  Michael A. King,et al.  Towards personalized injected patient doses for cardiac perfusion SPECT imaging: A retrospective study , 2016, 2016 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium, Medical Imaging Conference and Room-Temperature Semiconductor Detector Workshop (NSS/MIC/RTSD).

[27]  Giovanni Lucignani,et al.  Comparative analysis of full-time, half-time, and quarter-time myocardial ECG-gated SPECT quantification in normal-weight and overweight patients , 2017, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology.

[28]  A. E. Hoerl,et al.  Ridge regression: biased estimation for nonorthogonal problems , 2000 .

[29]  R. Tibshirani Regression Shrinkage and Selection via the Lasso , 1996 .

[30]  T. Ruddy,et al.  Half-Time SPECT Myocardial Perfusion Imaging with Attenuation Correction , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[31]  Maurizio Conti,et al.  Experimental comparison of lesion detectability for four fully-3D PET reconstruction schemes , 2007, 2007 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[32]  Michela Lecchi,et al.  The long way to dose reduction in myocardial perfusion imaging , 2017, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology.

[33]  Michael A. King,et al.  4-D Reconstruction With Respiratory Correction for Gated Myocardial Perfusion SPECT , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[34]  Robert P. Sheridan,et al.  Random Forest: A Classification and Regression Tool for Compound Classification and QSAR Modeling , 2003, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[35]  J. Case,et al.  Multicenter investigation comparing a highly efficient half-time stress-only attenuation correction approach against standard rest-stress Tc-99m SPECT imaging , 2008, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[36]  Xiaoyi Jiang,et al.  Respiratory Motion Correction in 3-D PET Data With Advanced Optical Flow Algorithms , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[37]  L. Shao,et al.  A generalized model for the conversion from CT numbers to linear attenuation coefficients , 2002 .

[38]  Gengsheng Lawrence Zeng,et al.  Reconstruction From Uniformly Attenuated SPECT Projection Data Using the DBH Method , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[39]  B. Chaitman,et al.  Exercise Technetium‐99m Sestamibi Tomography for Cardiac Risk Stratification of Patients With Stable Chest Pain , 1994, Circulation.

[40]  Freek J. Beekman,et al.  Efficient fully 3-D iterative SPECT reconstruction with Monte Carlo-based scatter compensation , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[41]  John J. Mahmarian,et al.  Patient-centered imaging , 2012, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology.

[42]  R. Glenn Wells,et al.  Dose reduction is good but it is image quality that matters , 2018, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology.

[43]  Guido Germano,et al.  Comparison of Fully Automated Computer Analysis and Visual Scoring for Detection of Coronary Artery Disease from Myocardial Perfusion SPECT in a Large Population , 2013, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.