Effects of predator behavior and proximity on risk assessment by Columbian black-tailed deer

In predator-prey encounters, many factors influence risk perception by prey and their decision to flee. Previous studies indicate that prey take flight at longer distances when they detect predators at longer distances and when the predator's behavior indicates the increased likelihood of attack. We examined the flight decisions of Columbian black-tailed deer (Odocoileus hemionus columbianus) using an approaching human whose speed, directness of approach, directness of gaze, and simulated gun carrying varied. Deer fled at greater distances when approached more quickly and directly, and there was a concave-down quadratic trend in the relationship between the distances at which the predator began its approach and at which the deer became alert (alert distance [AD]), indicating that deer have a zone of awareness beyond which there is a delay in detecting an approaching predator. Time spent assessing the approacher (assessment time) was shorter during faster approaches and was positively related with AD. Deer fled at longer distances and had shorter assessment times when they were already alert to the predator at the initiation of approach. Males fled at shorter distances than females when approached during the gun-holding condition, and males had shorter assessment times than females when the approacher averted his gaze. Such sex differences in risk assessment might reflect male motivation during the mating season as well as exposure to human hunting. We suggest that risk assessment is affected the by the predator's behavior, the state of awareness of the prey, and the distance at which they detect the predator. Copyright 2006.

[1]  E. Fernández-Juricic,et al.  Factors affecting intra- and inter-specific variations in the difference between alert distances and flight distances for birds in forested habitats , 2002 .

[2]  Daniel T Blumstein,et al.  Fear in animals: a meta-analysis and review of risk assessment , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[3]  James A. Rodgers,et al.  Set‐Back Distances to Protect Nesting Bird Colonies from Human Disturbance in Florida , 1995 .

[4]  M. Altmann The Flight Distance in Free-Ranging Big Game , 1958 .

[5]  F. Braña Shifts in body temperature and escape behaviour of female Podarcis muralis during pregnancy , 1993 .

[6]  S. Dodson,et al.  DO STONEFLY PREDATORS INFLUENCE BENTHIC DISTRIBUTIONS IN STREAMS , 1980 .

[7]  H. Hediger,et al.  Wild animals in captivity , 1950 .

[8]  W. Cooper When and how do predator starting distances affect flight initiation distances , 2005 .

[9]  N. J. Mackintosh,et al.  Stimulus selection: Learning to ignore stimuli that predict no change in reinforcement. , 1973 .

[10]  A. Hewison,et al.  Flight responses of park fallow deer to the human observer , 1998, Behavioural Processes.

[11]  Factors affecting the vigilance and flight behaviour of impalas , 2005 .

[12]  Richard G. Coss,et al.  Perceptual Determinants of Gaze Aversion By the Lesser Mouse Lemur (Microcebus Murinus), the Role of Two Facing Eyes , 1978 .

[13]  R. G. Coss,et al.  Recognition of partially concealed leopards by wild bonnet macaques (Macaca radiata) The role of the spotted coat , 2005, Behavioural Processes.

[14]  S. V. Wieren,et al.  Flight distance in roe deer Capreolus capreolus and fallow deer Dama dama as related to hunting and other factors , 2004, Wildlife Biology.

[15]  W. Cooper,et al.  Effects of risk, cost, and their interaction on optimal escape by nonrefuging Bonaire whiptail lizards, Cnemidophorus murinus , 2003 .

[16]  R. Dasmann,et al.  Behavior of Columbian Black-Tailed Deer with Reference to Population Ecology , 1956 .

[17]  H. Snell,et al.  Intrapopulation variation in predator-avoidance performance of Galápagos lava lizards: The interaction of sexual and natural selection , 1988, Evolutionary Ecology.

[18]  J. Madsen Impact of disturbance on field utilization of pink-footed geese in West Jutland, Denmark , 1985 .

[19]  R. L. Knight,et al.  WILDLIFE RESPONSES TO RECREATION AND ASSOCIATED VISITOR PERCEPTIONS , 2003 .

[20]  C. Dwyer How has the risk of predation shaped the behavioural responses of sheep to fear and distress? , 2004, Animal Welfare.

[21]  D. Bullock,et al.  Short-term responses of deer to recreational disturbances in two deer parks , 1993 .

[22]  G. Helfman Threat-sensitive predator avoidance in damselfish-trumpetfish interactions , 2004, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[23]  J. Bollinger,et al.  Snowmobile Effects on Movements of White-tailed Deer: A Case-study , 1979, Environmental Conservation.

[24]  D. Blumstein,et al.  Sensitivity of wildlife to spatial patterns of recreationist behavior: A critical assessment of minimum approaching distances and buffer areas for grassland birds , 2005 .

[25]  M. Berre,et al.  Ajustement des distances de fuite à l'homme chez Marmota marmota , 2000 .

[26]  S. Bulova Ecological Correlates of Population and Individual Variation in Antipredator Behavior of Two Species of Desert Lizards , 1994 .

[27]  M. E. Ellis Evolution of aversive information processing: a temporal trade-off hypothesis. , 1982, Brain, behavior and evolution.

[28]  E. Fernández-Juricic,et al.  Alert distance as an alternative measure of bird tolerance to human disturbance: implications for park design , 2001, Environmental Conservation.

[29]  J. Jeppesen Impact of human disturbance on home range, movements and activity of red deer (Cervus elaphus) in a Danish environment , 1987 .

[30]  V. Barnett,et al.  Applied Linear Statistical Models , 1975 .

[31]  Effects of hunting on hunter effort and white-tailed deer behavior. , 1980 .

[32]  D. F. Behrend,et al.  SUMMER FLIGHT BEHAVIOR OF WHITE-TAILED DEER IN TWO ADIRONDACK FORESTS1 , 1968 .

[33]  T. Caro,et al.  Antipredator Defenses in Birds and Mammals , 2006 .

[34]  Lawrence M. Dill,et al.  The escape response of the zebra danio (Brachydanio rerio) I. The stimulus for escape , 1974 .

[35]  R. G. Coss,et al.  PERCEPTUAL ASPECTS OF LEOPARD RECOGNITION BY WILD BONNET MACAQUES (MACACA RADIATA) , 2000 .

[36]  D. Kramer,et al.  The influence of distance to burrow on flight initiation distance in the woodchuck, Marmota monax , 1996 .

[37]  J. Madsen,et al.  Behavioural and distributional effects of hunting disturbance on waterbirds in Europe : implications for refuge design , 1997 .

[38]  L. Dill Distance-to-cover and the escape decisions of an African cichlid fish, Melanochromis chipokae , 1990, Environmental Biology of Fishes.

[39]  P. Aastrup,et al.  Responses of West Greenland caribou to the approach of humans on foot , 2000 .

[40]  Lawrence M. Dill,et al.  The Economics of Fleeing from Predators , 1986 .

[41]  D. Blumstein,et al.  Evaluating temporal and spatial margins of safety in galahs , 2005, Animal Behaviour.

[42]  G. Visser,et al.  Effects of disturbance on shorebirds : a summary of existing knowledge from the Dutch Wadden Sea and Delta area Cor , 2008 .

[43]  Patrick A. Zollner,et al.  Inter‐specific variation in avian responses to human disturbance , 2005 .

[44]  D. Blumstein Flight-initiation distance in birds is dependent on intruder starting distance , 2003 .

[45]  R. H. Johnston,et al.  Cardiac and Behavioral Responses of Mountain Sheep to Human Disturbance , 1982 .