Exploring Attribution of Responsibility in a Cross-National Study of TV News Coverage of the 2009 United Nations Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen

This study investigates how prime-time television news portrayed attributions of responsibility for climate change policy issues in the United States, China, and Canada. In analyzing news coverage of the 2009 climate change summit in Copenhagen, we distinguish between causal and treatment responsibility. Additionally, we develop frames to test Cerutti's conceptualization of responsibility attribution (2010). The results suggest that television news in the 3 countries portrayed treatment responsibility differently. The prominence of morality, global justice, and national efficacy frames varied across countries, and these conditions were associated with the treatment responsibility frame, partially lending support to the validity of Cerutti's conceptualization.

[1]  M. E. Villar,et al.  Constructing Climate Change in the Americas , 2013 .

[2]  L. Parker,et al.  Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Perspectives on the Top 20 Emitters and Developed Versus Developing Nations , 2013 .

[3]  Naila Hamdy,et al.  Framing the Egyptian Uprising in Arabic Language Newspapers and Social Media , 2012 .

[4]  Jules Boykoff.  US Media Coverage of the Cancún Climate Change Conference , 2012, PS: Political Science & Politics.

[5]  Robert J. Brulle,et al.  Shifting public opinion on climate change: an empirical assessment of factors influencing concern over climate change in the U.S., 2002–2010 , 2012, Climatic Change.

[6]  P. Hart.  One or Many? The Influence of Episodic and Thematic Climate Change Frames on Policy Preferences and Individual Behavior Change , 2011 .

[7]  Furio Cerutti,et al.  Defining Risk, Motivating Responsibility and Rethinking Global Warming , 2010, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[8]  medolbec.  Ideological cultures and media discourses on scientific knowledge: re-reading news on climate change , 2010 .

[9]  Annelore Deprez,et al.  Framing the First and Second Intifada: A Longitudinal Quantitative Research Design Applied to the Flemish Press , 2010 .

[10]  Dale Jamieson,et al.  Climate Change, Responsibility, and Justice , 2010, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[11]  E. Rebhan,et al.  Challenges for future energy usage , 2009 .

[12]  Ulrika Olausson.  Global warming—global responsibility? Media frames of collective action and scientific certainty , 2009 .

[13]  Steve Vanderheiden.  Atmospheric Justice: A Political Theory of Climate Change , 2008 .

[14]  Sei-Hill Kim,et al.  Talking about Poverty: News Framing of Who is Responsible for Causing and Fixing the Problem , 2007, Journal of health communication.

[15]  Yaeli Bloch-Elkon.  Studying the Media, Public Opinion, and Foreign Policy in International Crises: The United States and the Bosnian Crisis, 1992—1995 , 2007 .

[16]  Thomas P. Cafferty,et al.  Attribute and Responsibility Framing Effects in Television News Coverage of Poverty1 , 2006 .

[17]  D. Demeritt.  Science studies, climate change and the prospects for constructivist critique , 2006 .

[18]  J. Burgess,et al.  Cultural Circuits of Climate Change in U.K. Broadsheet Newspapers, 1985–2003 , 2005, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[19]  L. Antilla.  Climate of scepticism: US newspaper coverage of the science of climate change , 2005 .

[20]  A. Carvalho.  Representing the politics of the greenhouse effect: , 2005 .

[21]  K. Krippendorff.  Reliability in Content Analysis: Some Common Misconceptions and Recommendations , 2004 .

[22]  M. Boykoff,et al.  Balance as bias: global warming and the US prestige press☆ , 2004 .

[23]  D. Brossard,et al.  Are Issue-Cycles Culturally Constructed? A Comparison of French and American Coverage of Global Climate Change , 2004 .

[24]  Mike Schmierbach,et al.  The Interplay of News Frames on Cognitive Complexity , 2004 .

[25]  Robert J. Brulle,et al.  Media’s social construction of environmental issues: focus on global warming – a comparative study , 2003 .

[26]  George Sylvie.  The Elements of Journalism: What Newspeople Should Know and the Public Should Expect , 2001 .

[27]  Aaron M. McCright,et al.  Challenging global warming as a social problem: An analysis of the conservative movement's counter-claims , 2000 .

[28]  Richard R. Lau,et al.  The Meaning and Measure of Policy Metaphors , 2000, American Political Science Review.

[29]  P. Valkenburg,et al.  Framing European politics: a content analysis of press and television news , 2000 .

[30]  Stephen Zehr,et al.  Public representations of scientific uncertainty about global climate change , 2000 .

[31]  J. Shanahan,et al.  Telling Stories About Global Climate Change , 1999 .

[32]  David H. Weaver,et al.  The global journalist : news people around the world , 1998 .

[33]  CO2 Emissions from Fuel Combustion , 1997, Energy Exploration & Exploitation.

[34]  J. Cappella,et al.  Spiral of Cynicism: The Press and the Public Good , 1997 .

[35]  V. Lo,et al.  Individual, Organizational, and Societal Influences on Media Role Perceptions: A Comparative Study of Journalists in China, Taiwan, and the United States , 1997 .

[36]  Craig W. Trumbo,et al.  Constructing climate change: claims and frames in US news coverage of an environmental issue , 1996 .

[37]  Amy M. Hightower,et al.  Science and Engineering Indicators , 1993 .

[38]  Ann N. Crigler,et al.  Common Knowledge: News and the Construction of Political Meaning. , 1993 .

[39]  S. Iyengar.  Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. , 1991 .

[40]  S. Iyengar.  Framing responsibility for political issues: The case of poverty , 1990 .

[41]  D. Hosmer,et al.  Applied Logistic Regression , 1991 .

[42]  S. Hilgartner,et al.  The Rise and Fall of Social Problems: A Public Arenas Model , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[43]  Robert M. Entman,et al.  Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm , 1993 .

[44]  A. Bandura.  Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. , 1977, Psychological review.