Biomechanical and osteointegration study of 3D-printed porous PEEK hydroxyapatite-coated scaffolds

Abstract The objective of this study as to evaluate the biomechanical and osteointegration properties of 3D printed porous polyetheretherketone (PEEK) with hydroxyapatite (HA) coating by simulated body fluid (SBF) method. Cylindrical scaffolds were designed and fabricated by using PEEK material through fused deposition molding (FDM). The scaffolds were divided into solid group, porous group and porous-HA group (decorated by hydroxyapatite). The mechanical properties of each group of scaffolds were tested. Then, a total of 12 New Zealand rabbits were implemented for implantation of scaffolds at femoral condyle. Finally, the osteointegration ability of scaffolds were evaluated by Micro computed tomography (Micro-CT), histology and fluorescence staining. The HA was successfully decorated on the surface of the PEEK scaffold. The modulus of solid, porous and porous-HA group was 1289.43 ± 71.44 MPa, 196.36 ± 9.89 MPa and 183.29 ± 7.71 MPa, and the compressive strength was 107.24 ± 5.15 MPa, 33.12 ± 3.86 MPa and 29.99 ± 4.16 MPa, respectively. The micro-CT results showed that the bone volume/total volume ratio (BV/TV) in the porous-HA group was significantly greater than that in solid and porous group. Compared with porous group, the trabecular number (Tb. N) and trabecular thickness (Tb. Th) of porous-HA group was higher, and the trabecular spacing (Tb. Sp) was lower. The histology and fluorescence staining showed that more new bone tissue was formed in the porous-HA at different periods compared with the porous and solid groups. In addition, according to the results of the biomechanical test and osteointegration assessment, the biomechanical properties of 3D-printed porous PEEK scaffolds are close to human trabecular bone tissue, and the hydroxyapatite coating does not degrade its biomechanical performance. The porous structure can facilitate the integration of bone tissue, and the HA coating can markedly improve this process.

[1]  Jingcheng Wang,et al.  3D-Printed Multifunctional Polyetheretherketone Bone Scaffold for Multimodal Treatment of Osteosarcoma and Osteomyelitis. , 2021, ACS applied materials & interfaces.

[2]  Dichen Li,et al.  Additively-manufactured PEEK/HA porous scaffolds with highly-controllable mechanical properties and excellent biocompatibility. , 2021, Materials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications.

[3]  N. Sharma,et al.  Quantitative Assessment of Point-of-Care 3D-Printed Patient-Specific Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Cranial Implants , 2021, International journal of molecular sciences.

[4]  P. Kandwal,et al.  PEEK vs Titanium Cage for Anterior Column Reconstruction in Active Spinal Tuberculosis: A Comparative Study , 2021, Neurology India.

[5]  S. O. Ismail,et al.  Mechanical performances of hip implant design and fabrication with PEEK composite , 2021, Polymer.

[6]  E. Mancuso,et al.  3D printed PEEK/HA composites for bone tissue engineering applications: Effect of material formulation on mechanical performance and bioactive potential. , 2021, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[7]  F. T. Omigbodun,et al.  A systematic review of polymer composite in biomedical engineering , 2021, European Polymer Journal.

[8]  Kun Wang,et al.  Osteointegration of 3D-Printed Fully Porous Polyetheretherketone Scaffolds with Different Pore Sizes , 2020, ACS omega.

[9]  Bankole I. Oladapo,et al.  Lattice design and 3D-printing of PEEK with Ca10(OH)(PO4)3 and in-vitro bio-composite for bone implant. , 2020, International journal of biological macromolecules.

[10]  S. Kurtz,et al.  3D printed porous PEEK created via fused filament fabrication for osteoconductive orthopaedic surfaces. , 2020, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[11]  M. Kaur,et al.  Review on titanium and titanium based alloys as biomaterials for orthopaedic applications. , 2019, Materials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications.

[12]  A. Benko,et al.  Novel chitosan/agarose/hydroxyapatite nanocomposite scaffold for bone tissue engineering applications: comprehensive evaluation of biocompatibility and osteoinductivity with the use of osteoblasts and mesenchymal stem cells , 2019, International journal of nanomedicine.

[13]  Z. Stopa,et al.  Evaluation of the Safety and Clinical Efficacy of Allogeneic Bone Grafts in the Reconstruction of the Maxilla and Mandible. , 2018, Transplantation proceedings.

[14]  A. Wennerberg,et al.  Biomechanical, histological, and computed X-ray tomographic analyses of hydroxyapatite coated PEEK implants in an extended healing model in rabbit. , 2018, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[15]  W. Müller,et al.  3D printing of hybrid biomaterials for bone tissue engineering: Calcium-polyphosphate microparticles encapsulated by polycaprolactone. , 2017, Acta biomaterialia.

[16]  J. Torner,et al.  Titanium vs. polyetheretherketone (PEEK) interbody fusion: Meta-analysis and review of the literature , 2017, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.

[17]  S. Matsuda,et al.  Title Effect of pore size on bone ingrowth into porous titanium implants fabricated by additive manufacturing: An in vivo , 2017 .

[18]  Tomiharu Matsushita,et al.  Effect of pore size on bone ingrowth into porous titanium implants fabricated by additive manufacturing: An in vivo experiment. , 2016, Materials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications.

[19]  Muhammad Sohail Zafar,et al.  Applications of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) in oral implantology and prosthodontics. , 2016, Journal of prosthodontic research.

[20]  Jinshan Li,et al.  Fabrication, pore structure and compressive behavior of anisotropic porous titanium for human trabecular bone implant applications. , 2015, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[21]  Mark Taylor,et al.  Enhancement of CRF-PEEK osseointegration by plasma-sprayed hydroxyapatite: A rabbit model , 2014, Journal of biomaterials applications.

[22]  A. Rabiei,et al.  Processing and evaluation of bioactive coatings on polymeric implants. , 2013, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[23]  W. Teughels,et al.  Corrosion behaviour of titanium in the presence of Streptococcus mutans. , 2013, Journal of dentistry.

[24]  W. Yuan,et al.  Comparison of titanium and polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages in the surgical treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a prospective, randomized, control study with over 7-year follow-up , 2013, European Spine Journal.

[25]  M. Neo,et al.  Osteoinduction of porous Ti implants with a channel structure fabricated by selective laser melting. , 2011, Acta biomaterialia.

[26]  C. Niu,et al.  Outcomes of Interbody Fusion Cages Used in 1 and 2-levels Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: Titanium Cages Versus Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Cages , 2010, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[27]  Hyoun‐Ee Kim,et al.  The electron beam deposition of titanium on polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and the resulting enhanced biological properties. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[28]  Shinn-Zong Lin,et al.  Efficacy of anterior cervical fusion: Comparison of titanium cages, polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages and autogenous bone grafts , 2008, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.

[29]  M Honl,et al.  Artificial composite bone as a model of human trabecular bone: the implant-bone interface. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[30]  E. Drioli,et al.  The influence of polymeric membrane surface free energy on cell metabolic functions , 2001, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[31]  O. Noiset,et al.  Fibronectin adsorption or/and covalent grafting on chemically modified PEEK film surfaces. , 1999, Journal of biomaterials science. Polymer edition.

[32]  S. Cook,et al.  Preliminary evaluation of titanium-coated PEEK dental implants. , 1995, The Journal of oral implantology.

[33]  T. Kokubo,et al.  Bioactive glass ceramics: properties and applications. , 1991, Biomaterials.

[34]  H. Skinner,et al.  Composite technology for total hip arthroplasty. , 1988, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.