Dynamic coalition reformation for adaptive demand and capacity sharing

To deal with volatile product demand and rapidly changing manufacturing technologies for sustainable returns, selective collaboration among companies in supply networks (SNs) is required. Recently, demand and capacity sharing among independent and non-competitive manufacturers, at the same horizontal layer in SNs, has been studied. Through an appropriate coalition for collaborative demand and capacity sharing, manufacturers can minimize their lost sales, as well as maximize production capacity utilization against lumpy real demand. In a previous study, we have developed the Collaborative Demand and Capacity Sharing (CDCS) protocol which addresses a long-term profitable and well-balanced collaboration for each manufacturer through distributed decision making. However, the uncertainty of circumstances calls for an effective and timely reformation of coalitions. In reality, there is a trade-off between frequent accommodation to changeable environments and high additional costs incurred by reformation. Hence, in this paper, we design the Adaptive CDCS protocol based on dynamic contract mechanism. In each period, our protocol suggests whether to reform existing coalitions or not based on theoretical analyses of long-term expected net profit. To evaluate its performance, a numerical experiment is conducted by comparing three models: no collaboration, static collaboration, and dynamic collaboration by Adaptive CDCS protocol. Dynamic collaboration results in more profits and its balanced redistribution by accommodating with changeable conditions.

[1]  Murali Agastya,et al.  Adaptive Play in Multiplayer Bargaining Situations , 1997 .

[2]  Sang Won Yoon,et al.  Demand and capacity sharing decisions and protocols in a collaborative network of enterprises , 2010, Decis. Support Syst..

[3]  Sameh M. Saad,et al.  A sustainability value system principle for a global supply chain , 2010 .

[4]  Stéphane Dauzère-Pérès,et al.  Planning and scheduling in a multi-site environment , 1999 .

[5]  D. Rogers,et al.  A framework of sustainable supply chain management: moving toward new theory , 2008 .

[6]  Sarit Kraus,et al.  Coalition Formation Among Autonomous Agents: Strategies and Complexity , 1993, MAAMAW.

[7]  Debraj Ray,et al.  Coalition formation as a dynamic process , 2003, J. Econ. Theory.

[8]  John Cairns,et al.  Will the real sustainability concept please stand up , 2004 .

[9]  John P. Wilson Triple Bottom Line , 2015, The International Encyclopedia of Higher Education Systems and Institutions.

[10]  Edward W. Packel,et al.  A Stochastic Solution Concept for n-Person Games , 1981, Math. Oper. Res..

[11]  R. Handfield,et al.  The Green Supply Chain: Integrating Suppliers into Environmental Management Processes , 1998 .

[12]  Yossi Aviv,et al.  On the Benefits of Collaborative Forecasting Partnerships Between Retailers and Manufacturers , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[13]  Carlo Vercellis,et al.  Multi-plant production planning in capacitated self-configuring two-stage serial systems , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[14]  Shimon Y. Nof,et al.  Sustainability decision support system based on collaborative control theory , 2012, Annu. Rev. Control..

[15]  Daniel F. Lynch,et al.  Examining supply chain relationships: Do buyer and supplier perspectives on collaborative relationships differ? , 2010 .

[16]  T. Dieckmann The evolution of conventions with mobile players , 1999 .

[17]  Manfredi Bruccoleri,et al.  High Level Planning of Reconfigurable Enterprises: a Game Theoretic Approach , 2006 .

[18]  Sang Won Yoon,et al.  Affiliation/dissociation decision models in demand and capacity sharing collaborative network , 2011 .

[19]  Paolo Renna,et al.  Production planning and automated negotiation for SMEs: An agent based e-procurement application , 2010 .

[20]  Shimon Y. Nof,et al.  Collaborative capacity sharing among manufacturers on the same supply network horizontal layer for sustainable and balanced returns , 2014 .

[21]  M. Barratt Understanding the meaning of collaboration in the supply chain , 2004 .

[22]  Paolo Renna,et al.  Capacity sharing in a network of independent factories: A cooperative game theory approach , 2011 .

[23]  Ulrich Schwalbe,et al.  Dynamic Coalition Formation and the Core , 2002 .

[24]  Matthias Klusch,et al.  Dynamic Coalition Formation among Rational Agents , 2002, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[25]  Murali Agastya,et al.  Perturbed Adaptive Dynamics in Coalition Form Games , 1999 .

[26]  J. Jiao Design economics of product platforms for enterprise sustainability towards mass customization , 2009, 2009 16th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management.

[27]  Paolo Renna,et al.  A game theoretic coordination for trading capacity in multisite factory environment , 2010 .

[28]  Joseph B. Mazzola,et al.  Lagrangian-relaxation-based solution procedures for a multiproduct capacitated facility location problem with choice of facility type , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[29]  A. Gunasekaran,et al.  Supply chain collaboration: Impact of success in long-term partnerships , 2014 .

[30]  Shu-Jung Sunny Yang,et al.  Price negotiation for capacity sharing in a two-factory environment using genetic algorithm , 2008 .

[31]  Wang Jing,et al.  Notice of RetractionResearch on green supply chain management for manufacturing enterprises based on Green SCOR Model , 2010, 2010 International Conference on Computer and Communication Technologies in Agriculture Engineering.

[32]  I. Seilonen,et al.  A mediator-based approach for decentralised production planning, scheduling and monitoring , 2000 .

[33]  Roland Leduc,et al.  Sustainable Development in Engineering: A Review of Principles and Definition of a Conceptual Framework , 2009 .

[34]  K. F. Man,et al.  Multi-product planning and scheduling using genetic algorithm approach , 2000 .