Measuring Particulate Mass Emissions with the Electrical Low Pressure Impactor

The electrical low pressure impactor (ELPI) is a useful tool for recording transient particle size distributions, such as in motor vehicle emissions. But for sub-micron aerosols, the straightforward mass weighting and integration of these size distributions overestimates the particulate matter (PM) mass by a factor of two or more. The present article examines the sources of this discrepancy and develops an analysis that allows quantitative PM mass measurement with an accuracy of about 20%. This procedure is applied to measure motor vehicle PM emissions, and the results are compared with filter-based gravimetric determinations. Good agreement is achieved for diesel and direct injection gasoline vehicles. For particulate trap equipped diesel vehicles and conventional gasoline vehicles, the PM mass recorded by the ELPI is often substantially lower than the filter based mass owing to the gaseous adsorption artifact of the latter. Accurate work at very low emissions levels, less than ∼ 1 mg/mi, requires further study of how reliably the ELPI can provide semivolatile nanoparticle mass as well as an improved understanding of filter-based vehicle exhaust measurement.

[1]  R. W. Waytulonis,et al.  Chemical analysis of diesel engine nanoparticles using a nano-DMA/thermal desorption particle beam mass spectrometer. , 2001, Environmental science & technology.

[2]  Matthew W. Spears,et al.  Phase-based TEOM Measurements Compared with Traditional Filters for Diesel PM , 2003 .

[3]  M. Maricq,et al.  Vehicle Exhaust Particle Size Distributions: A Comparison of Tailpipe and Dilution Tunnel Measurements , 1999 .

[4]  U Lehmann,et al.  New method for time-resolved diesel engine exhaust particle mass measurement. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[5]  Reinhard Niessner,et al.  Photoacoustic soot sensor for in-situ black carbon monitoring , 1996 .

[6]  P. Mcmurry,et al.  Relationship between particle mass and mobility for diesel exhaust particles. , 2003, Environmental science & technology.

[7]  K. J. Weiland,et al.  Laser-induced incandescence: Development and characterization towards a measurement of soot-volume fraction , 1994 .

[8]  M. Maricq,et al.  The effective density and fractal dimension of soot particles from premixed flames and motor vehicle exhaust , 2004 .

[9]  Richard E. Chase,et al.  Time-Resolved Measurements of Exhaust PM for FTP-75:Comparison of LII, ELPI, and TEOM Techniques , 2004 .

[10]  Jorma Keskinen,et al.  PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF THE ELECTRICAL LOW-PRESSURE IMPACTOR (ELPI) , 2000 .

[11]  Roberto Casati,et al.  Composition of Semi-volatile Particles from Diesel Exhaust , 2005 .

[12]  Jorma Keskinen,et al.  Electrical low pressure impactor , 1992 .

[13]  J. Keskinen,et al.  ELPI Response and Data Reduction I: Response Functions , 2005 .

[14]  N. Clark,et al.  Comparison of Heavy-Duty Truck Diesel Particulate Matter Measurement:TEOM and Traditional Filter , 2005 .

[15]  J. Keskinen,et al.  The ELPI Response and Data Reduction II: Properties of Kernels and Data Inversion , 2005 .

[16]  Harvey Patashnick,et al.  Continuous PM-10 Measurements Using the Tapered Element Oscillating Microbalance , 1990 .

[17]  Jorma Keskinen,et al.  Fine particle losses in electrical low-pressure impactor , 2001 .

[18]  J. Richert,et al.  Comparison of an Alternative Particulate Mass Measurement with Advanced Microbalance Analysis , 2004 .

[19]  Leonidas Ntziachristos,et al.  Electrical Filter Stage for the ELPI , 2002 .

[20]  J. Keskinen,et al.  Effect of impaction plate roughness and porosity on collection efficiency , 2004 .

[21]  H. Burtscher Physical characterization of particulate emissions from diesel engines: a review , 2005 .

[22]  D. Kittelson Engines and nanoparticles: a review , 1998 .

[23]  Nick Collings,et al.  Mass Correlation of Engine Emissions with Spectral Instruments , 2006 .

[24]  M. Maricq Chemical characterization of particulate emissions from diesel engines: A review , 2007 .

[25]  Artur Braun,et al.  Size-range analysis of diesel soot with ultra-small angle X-ray scattering , 2004 .

[26]  Jacob A. Moulijn,et al.  Restriction for the ELPI in diesel particulate measurements , 2001 .

[27]  Hannes Tammet,et al.  Electrical aerosol spectrometer of Tartu University , 1998 .

[28]  M. Maricq,et al.  Signature size distributions for diesel and gasoline engine exhaust particulate matter , 2001 .

[29]  Richard E. Chase,et al.  PM Measurement Artifact: Organic Vapor Deposition on Different Filter Media , 2004 .

[30]  Richard E. Chase,et al.  Size Distributions of Motor Vehicle Exhaust PM: A Comparison Between ELPI and SMPS Measurements , 2000 .