What sort of community is the European Conference on Information Systems? A social network analysis 1993–2005

This paper presents a social network analysis (SNA) of the European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS) community based on patterns of co-authorship. ECIS contributions are separated into research papers and panels to create social networks that are then analyzed using a range of global network level and individual ego (co-author, panellist) measures. The research community is found to have few properties of the ‘small world’ and to represent an agglomeration of co-authorships. The panels network has the properties of a ‘small world’ and displays a stronger sense of social cohesion. An analysis of individual actors (egos) provides insight into who is central to the ECIS community. Based on the SNA, a range of possible interventions are proposed that could aid the future development of the ECIS community. The paper concludes by considering the usefulness of SNA as a method to support IS research.

[1]  H. Milward,et al.  Dark Networks as Problems , 2003 .

[2]  Ian Wilkinson,et al.  Social Networks of Researchers in B2B Marketing: A Case Study of the IMP Group 1984–1999 , 2005 .

[3]  Andrew Parker,et al.  Knowing What We Know: Supporting Knowledge Creation and Sharing in Social Networks , 2001 .

[4]  Martin G. Everett,et al.  Models of core/periphery structures , 2000, Soc. Networks.

[5]  R. Burt.  Brokerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Capital , 2005 .

[6]  L. Freeman,et al.  Centrality in valued graphs: A measure of betweenness based on network flow , 1991 .

[7]  G. C. Homans,et al.  Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms. , 1975 .

[8]  L. Freeman,et al.  Centrality in social networks: ii. experimental results☆ , 1979 .

[9]  P. Bonacich.  Factoring and weighting approaches to status scores and clique identification , 1972 .

[10]  S. Barley.  The alignment of technology and structure through roles and networks. , 1990, Administrative science quarterly.

[11]  Tim Rowley.  Moving Beyond Dyadic Ties: A Network Theory of Stakeholder Influences , 1997 .

[12]  L. Freeman.  Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification , 1978 .

[13]  W. Powell,et al.  Network Dynamics and Field Evolution: The Growth of Interorganizational Collaboration in the Life Sciences1 , 2005, American Journal of Sociology.

[14]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Six Degrees: The Science of a Connected Age , 2003 .

[15]  Ezra W. Zuckerman,et al.  Networks, Diversity, and Productivity: The Social Capital of Corporate R&D Teams , 2001 .

[16]  David T. Wilson,et al.  Managing Business Relationships , 1998 .

[17]  Pierre Bourdieu,et al.  Science of Science and Reflexivity , 2004 .

[18]  J. Coleman,et al.  Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[19]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[20]  Walter W. Powell,et al.  Knowledge Networks as Channels and Conduits: The Effects of Spillovers in the Boston Biotechnology Community , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[21]  J. Moody.  The Structure of a Social Science Collaboration Network: Disciplinary Cohesion from 1963 to 1999 , 2004 .

[22]  Joseph A. Cote,et al.  Assessing the Influence of Journal of Consumer Research: A Citation Analysis , 1991 .

[23]  J. Nunamaker,et al.  Proceedings of the 32nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences , 1999 .

[24]  Ralph S. Brower,et al.  Three traditions of network research: What the public management research agenda can learn from other research communities , 2004 .

[25]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[26]  Franco Zambonelli,et al.  Knowledge Networks , 2005, WAC.

[27]  Alain Degenne,et al.  Introducing Social Networks , 1999 .

[28]  Flint Schier.  Ulysses and the Sirens , 1980 .

[29]  Michael H. Zack,et al.  Researching organizational systems using social network analysis , 2000, Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[30]  Lars-Erik Gadde,et al.  The Business Marketing Course: Managing in Complex Networks (2nd edition) , 2001 .

[31]  Vladimir Batagelj,et al.  Centrality in Social Networks , 1993 .

[32]  S. Borgatti,et al.  The Network Paradigm in Organizational Research: A Review and Typology , 2003 .

[33]  Daniel J. Brass,et al.  Changing patterns or patterns of change: the effects of a change in technology on social network str , 1990 .

[34]  Larry M. Robinson,et al.  Measuring the impact of marketing scholars and institutions: an analysis of citation frequency , 1981 .

[35]  E. Holmen,et al.  Strategizing through analyzing and influencing the network horizon , 2003 .

[36]  Patricia E. Tweet.  Brokerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Capital , 2006 .

[37]  P. Blau.  Exchange and Power in Social Life , 1964 .

[38]  D. Watts.  The “New” Science of Networks , 2004 .

[39]  Mark S. Granovetter.  Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[40]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition , 1995, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[41]  Valentina Hlebec,et al.  Reliability of measures of centrality and prominence , 2005, Soc. Networks.

[42]  E. Shils.  The Constitution Of Society , 1982 .

[43]  G. Walsham.  Actor-network theory and IS research: current status and future prospects , 1997 .

[44]  H. Maturana,et al.  Autopoiesis and Cognition , 1980 .

[45]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[46]  T. Kuhn.  The structure of scientific revolutions, 3rd ed. , 1996 .

[47]  Jie Wu,et al.  Small Worlds: The Dynamics of Networks between Order and Randomness , 2003 .

[48]  Daniel J. Brass.  A social network perspective on human resources management , 1992 .

[49]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  Knowledge Networks: Explaining Effective Knowledge Sharing in Multiunit Companies , 2002 .

[50]  ReagansRay,et al.  Networks, Diversity, and Productivity , 2001 .

[51]  James William Coleman,et al.  Competition and the Structure of Industrial Society: Reply to Braithwaite , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[52]  P. Bourdieu,et al.  The Field of Cultural Production , 1993 .

[53]  M. Newman,et al.  The structure of scientific collaboration networks. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[54]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[55]  Robert D. Galliers,et al.  An Anatomy of European Information Systems Research ECIS 1993-ECIS 2002 : Some Initial Findings , 2002, ECIS.

[56]  Mark S. Granovetter.  Getting a Job: A Study of Contacts and Careers , 1974 .

[57]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations , 2001, cond-mat/0104162.

[58]  Mark S. Granovetter.  T H E S T R E N G T H O F WEAK TIES: A NETWORK THEORY REVISITED , 1983 .

[59]  A. Giddens.  The Constitution of Society , 1985 .

[60]  B. Latour.  Technology is Society Made Durable , 1990 .

[61]  S. Borgatti,et al.  Making Invisible Work Visible: Using Social Network Analysis to Support Strategic Collaboration , 2002 .

[62]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994, Structural analysis in the social sciences.

[63]  K. Möller,et al.  Managing Strategic Nets , 2003 .

[64]  AC Grayling,et al.  Laboratory life Rebecca Lemov World as Laboratory: Exper , 2006, The Lancet.

[65]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[66]  M. Castells.  The rise of the network society , 1996 .

[67]  D. Krackhardt.  The strength of strong ties: The importance of Philos in organizations , 2003 .