DORIS Contribution to ITRF2005

We examine the contribution of the Doppler Orbit determination and Radiopositioning Integrated by Satellite (DORIS) technique to the International Terrestrial Reference Frame (ITRF2005) by evaluating the quality of the submitted solutions as well as that of the frame parameters, especially the origin and the scale. Unlike the previous versions of the ITRF, ITRF2005 is constructed with input data in the form of time-series of station positions (weekly for satellite techniques and daily for VLBI) and daily Earth orientation parameters (EOPs), including full variance–covariance information. Analysis of the DORIS station positions’ time-series indicates an internal precision reaching 15 mm or better, at a weekly sampling. A cumulative solution using 12 years of weekly time-series was obtained and compared to a similar International GNSS Service (IGS) GPS solution (at 37 co-located sites) yielding a weighted root mean scatter (WRMS) of the order of 8 mm in position (at the epoch of minimum variance) and about 2.5 mm/year in velocity. The quality of this cumulative solution resulting from the combination of two individual DORIS solutions is better than any individual solution. A quality assessment of polar motion embedded in the contributed DORIS solutions is performed by comparison with the results of other space-geodetic techniques and in particular GPS. The inferred WRMS of polar motion varies significantly from one DORIS solution to another and is between 0.5 and 2 mas, depending on the strategy used and in particular estimating or not polar motion rate by the analysis centers. This particular aspect certainly needs more investigation by the DORIS Analysis Centers.

[1]  P. Willis,et al.  DORIS as a potential part of a global geodetic observing system , 2005 .

[2]  R. Nerem,et al.  Geophysical interpretation of observed geocenter variations , 1999 .

[3]  Z. Altamimi,et al.  Results and analysis of the ITRF94. , 1996 .

[4]  G. Blewitt.  Self‐consistency in reference frames, geocenter definition, and surface loading of the solid Earth , 2003 .

[5]  Jean-François Crétaux,et al.  Seasonal and interannual geocenter motion from SLR and DORIS measurements: Comparison with surface loading data , 2002 .

[6]  P. Willis,et al.  Applications géodésiques du système DORIS à l'Institut géographique national , 2005 .

[7]  Claude Boucher,et al.  New trends for the realization of the international terrestrial reference system , 2002 .

[8]  Zuheir Altamimi,et al.  Long-term stability of the terrestrial reference frame , 2004 .

[9]  Pascal Willis,et al.  The International DORIS Service , 2005 .

[10]  M. Watkins,et al.  The gravity recovery and climate experiment: Mission overview and early results , 2004 .

[11]  Jean-François Crétaux,et al.  Present‐day tectonic plate motions and crustal deformations from the DORIS space system , 1998 .

[12]  M. K. Cheng,et al.  Geocenter variations caused by atmosphere, ocean and surface ground water , 1997 .

[13]  Peter J. Clarke,et al.  Geocenter motions from GPS: A unified observation model , 2006 .

[14]  John C. Ries,et al.  The International Doris Service (IDS) , 2004 .

[15]  Anny Cazenave,et al.  Geocentre motion from the DORIS space system and laser data to the Lageos satellites: comparison with surface loading data , 2000 .

[16]  Claude Boucher,et al.  A review of algebraic constraints in terrestrial reference frame datum definition , 2001 .

[17]  Zuheir Altamimi,et al.  ITRF2000: From Theory to Implementation , 2004 .

[18]  Jean-François Crétaux,et al.  Vertical crustal motions from the DORIS Space‐Geodesy System , 1999 .

[19]  Geoffrey Blewitt,et al.  Effect of annual signals on geodetic velocity , 2002 .

[20]  Zuheir Altamimi,et al.  Multi-technique Combination of Time Series of Station Positions and Earth Orientation Parameters , 2003 .

[21]  Zuheir Altamimi,et al.  ITRF2000: A new release of the International Terrestrial Reference Frame for earth science applications , 2002 .

[22]  Rolf König,et al.  A new global Earth's gravity field model from satellite orbit perturbations: GRIM5‐S1 , 2000 .

[23]  Pascal Willis,et al.  Error Analysis of Weekly Station Coordinates in the DORIS Network , 2006 .

[24]  Pascal Willis,et al.  External validation of the GRACE GGM01C gravity field using GPS and DORIS positioning results , 2004 .

[25]  Hervé Fagard,et al.  Twenty years of evolution for the DORIS permanent network: from its initial deployment to its renovation , 2006 .

[26]  P. Willis,et al.  Defining a DORIS core network for Jason-1 precise orbit determination based on ITRF2000: methods and realization , 2005 .

[27]  P. Willis,et al.  Systematic errors in the Z-geocenter derived using satellite tracking data: a case study from SPOT-4 DORIS data in 1998 , 2006 .