Effects of DEM resolution and watershed subdivision on hydrological simulation in the Xingzihe watershed

The Soil and Water Assessment Tool(SWAT) is a watershed-based,semi-distributed hydrologic model that has become one of the most powerful tools for simulating hydrological processes at different spatial scales.The SWAT model utilizes geographic information systems and digital elevation model(DEM) to delineate watersheds and extract the stream network.The simulation accuracy depends on how well the model inputs describe the watershed.High resolution DEM generates more accurate topographic estimations,but such information is costly to obtain,especially in the hilly and gully region of China′s Loess Plateau.In addition,the size of the extracted subwatersheds strongly depends on the pre-selected threshold value of the watershed subdivision.The size and number of subwatersheds can also affect the watershed modeling process and subsequent results;however,there are no accepted guidelines for selecting the threshold value,making the extraction of subwatersheds a subjective process.Therefore,the objective of this study was to investigate the effect of DEM resolution and watershed subdivision on the simulation of hydrological processes at the outlet of the Xingzihe watershed in the hilly and gully region of the Loess Plateau.In our study,the digital filter method was used to separate base flow from the measured streamflow data at the Zhao′an hydrological station from 1958 to 1974.The applicability of the SWAT model in the Xingzihe watershed was assessed on an annual basis.The impacts of DEM resolution and watershed subdivision on the simulation of annual streamflow,surface runoff,base flow,and sediment yield were evaluated by running the model with ten DEMs(20,30,60,90,150,300,500,1000,1500 and 2000 m) and seven threshold values(10,12,15,30,50,100 and 200 km2) for the watershed subdivision.The results showed that the SWAT model accurately simulated annual streamflow,surface runoff,base flow,and sediment yield in the Xingzihe watershed.DEMs with fine resolution(i.e.,20 to 150 m) were required to simultaneously simulate annual streamflow,surface runoff,base flow and sediment yield with a high degree of accuracy(R20.93,NSE0.51,RSR0.43).For DEM resolutions greater than 150 m,the accuracy of the simulation varied among the hydrologic elements.The threshold values of the watershed subdivision had little effect on streamflow,surface runoff and base flow.However,the threshold values had a large effect on sediment yield.Watershed subdivision threshold values of 12 to 100 km2 were required to adequately predict sediment yield.Threshold values less than 12 km2 or greater than 100 km2 led to the underestimation of sediment yield.These findings indicated that choices regarding the DEM resolution and threshold value of the watershed subdivision should be based on the hydrological element of interest.The SWAT model was limited in its ability to simultaneously simulate all of the hydrologic elements in the Xingzihe watershed at short time scales(i.e.,daily and monthly);therefore,this paper did not discuss the effects of DEM resolution and watershed subdivision threshold values under different time scales.Additional research is needed to ascertain if the results will change when running the model at different time scales.

[1]  Yin Xiong-rui Study on the Hydrological Response to Climate Change in Wuyur River Basin Based on the SWAT Model , 2010 .

[2]  Jeffrey G. Arnold,et al.  EFFECT OF WATERSHED SUBDIVISION ON SWAT FLOW, SEDIMENT, AND NUTRIENT PREDICTIONS 1 , 2002 .

[3]  J. Arnold,et al.  VALIDATION OF THE SWAT MODEL ON A LARGE RWER BASIN WITH POINT AND NONPOINT SOURCES 1 , 2001 .

[4]  J. Nash,et al.  River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles☆ , 1970 .

[5]  B. Engel,et al.  Development of a SWAT Patch for Better Estimation of Sediment Yield in Steep Sloping Watersheds 1 , 2009 .

[6]  L. M. Risse,et al.  Spatial resolution of soil data and channel erosion effects on SWAT model predictions of flow and sediment , 2010, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

[7]  Wang Kai,et al.  Review on advancement of study on digital riverbasin in China , 2006 .

[8]  R. Govindaraju,et al.  Effect of geomorphologic resolution on modeling of runoff hydrograph and sedimentograph over small watersheds , 2003 .

[9]  T. McMahon,et al.  Evaluation of automated techniques for base flow and recession analyses , 1990 .

[10]  Jeffrey G. Arnold,et al.  Model Evaluation Guidelines for Systematic Quantification of Accuracy in Watershed Simulations , 2007 .

[11]  Qin Bo-qiang Analysis on factors inducing algal bloom in reservoir based on basin eutrophication model , 2009 .

[12]  D. Mackay,et al.  Impacts of input parameter spatial aggregation on an agricultural nonpoint source pollution model , 2000 .

[13]  Raghavan Srinivasan,et al.  Effect of GIS data quality on small watershed stream flow and sediment simulations , 2005 .

[14]  T. A. Costello,et al.  Effect of DEM data resolution on SWAT output uncertainty , 2005 .

[15]  Vincent Chaplot,et al.  Impact of DEM mesh size and soil map scale on SWAT runoff, sediment, and NO3-N loads predictions , 2005 .

[16]  John R. Williams Sediment-yield prediction with Universal Equation using runoff energy factor , 1975 .