Proceedings of the Workshop on Computational Models of Language Acquisition and Loss

The past decades have seen a massive expansion in the application of statistical and machine learning methods to speech and natural language processing. This work has yielded impressive results which have generally been viewed as engineering achievements. Recently researchers have begun to investigate the relevance of computational learning methods for research on human language acquisition and loss. The human ability to acquire and process language has long attracted interest and generated much debate due to the apparent ease with which such a complex and dynamic system is learnt and used on the face of ambiguity, noise and uncertainty. On the other hand, changes in language abilities during aging and eventual losses related to conditions such as Alzheimer's disease and dementia have also attracted considerable investigative efforts. Parallels between the acquisition and loss have been raised, and a better understanding of the mechanisms involved in both, and of how the algorithms used to access concepts are affected in pathological cases can lead to earlier diagnosis and more targeted treatments. The use of computational modeling is a relatively recent trend boosted by advances in machine learning techniques, and the availability of resources like corpora of child and child-directed sentences, and data from psycholinguistic tasks by normal and pathological groups. Many of the existing computational models attempt to study language tasks under cognitively plausible criteria (such as memory and processing limitations that humans face), and to explain the developmental stages observed in the acquisition and evolution of the language abilities. This was the third edition of this workshop that was first held at ACL 2007 in Prague and then in EACL 2009 in Athens. The workshop was targeted at anyone interested in the relevance of computational techniques for understanding first, second and bilingual language acquisition and change or loss in normal and pathological conditions. We invited submissions on relevant topics, including: * Computational learning theory and analysis of language learning * Computational models of first, second and bilingual language acquisition or of the evolution of language * Computational models and analysis of factors that influence language acquisition and loss in different age groups and cultures * Data resources and tools for investigating computational models of human language processes * Empirical and theoretical comparisons of the environment and its impact on acquisition * Investigations and comparisons of supervised, unsupervised and weakly-supervised methods for learning Submissions included works on specific languages like English, Portuguese and Hebrew, and also crosslinguistic studies. Besides paper presentations the technical program included resources and systems demonstrations, and two invited talks by Mark Steedman, from University of Edinburgh (UK) and Alessandro Lenci, from University of Pisa (Italy).

[1]  A. Goldberg The Emergence of the Semantics of Argument Structure Constructions , 2013 .

[2]  Fabio Montermini,et al.  Enriched sublexical representations to access morphological structures. A psycho-computational account , 2011, TAL.

[3]  A. Wray Formulaic language in learners and native speakers , 1999, Language Teaching.

[4]  Bertil Malmberg A FONÉTICA: TEORIA E APLICAÇÕES , 1993 .

[5]  Jaine Beswick,et al.  Regional Nationalism in Spain: Language Use and Ethnic Identity in Galicia , 2007 .

[6]  Barbara John A Thomas Lohse,et al.  Domain Minimization in English Verb-Particle Constructions , 2004 .

[7]  Michael Wilson MRC Psycholinguistic Database , 2001 .

[8]  N. Schmitt,et al.  L2 Learner Production and Processing of Collocation: A Multi-study Perspective , 2008 .

[9]  Eckhard Bick Multi-level NER for Portuguese in a CG Framework , 2003, PROPOR.

[10]  Shuly Wintner,et al.  Computational Models of Language Acquisition , 2010, CICLing.

[11]  Timothy Baldwin,et al.  A Resource for Evaluating the Deep Lexical Acquisition of English Verb-Particle Constructions , 2008, LREC 2008.

[12]  Michael S Vitevitch,et al.  The influence of sublexical and lexical representations on the processing of spoken words in English , 2003, Clinical linguistics & phonetics.

[13]  Norbert Schmitt,et al.  Native and nonnative use of multi-word vs. one-word verbs , 2007 .

[14]  Ralph Grishman,et al.  Towards Best Practice for Multiword Expressions in Computational Lexicons , 2002, LREC.

[15]  Michael Tomasello,et al.  Particle placement in early child language: A multifactorial analysis , 2005 .

[16]  A. Aikhenvald,et al.  Language Contact in Amazonia , 2003 .

[17]  Alison Wray,et al.  Formulaic Language and the Lexicon: List of Figures and Tables , 2002 .

[18]  Leonor Scliar-Cabral Princípios do sistema alfabético do português do Brasil , 2003 .

[19]  Bruce Fraser,et al.  The verb-particle combination in English , 1976 .

[20]  Stephen G. Parker,et al.  Phonological argumentation : essays on evidence and motivation , 2009 .

[21]  Charles Kemp,et al.  Bayesian models of cognition , 2008 .

[22]  D. Bolinger The phrasal verb in English , 1974 .

[23]  Aline Villavicencio,et al.  A large scale annotated child language construction database , 2012, LREC.

[24]  Manuela L. Cameirão,et al.  Age-of-acquisition norms for a set of 1,749 Portuguese words , 2010, Behavior research methods.

[25]  Ted Briscoe,et al.  Evaluating the Accuracy of an Unlexicalized Statistical Parser on the PARC DepBank , 2006, ACL.

[26]  R. Barker Bausell,et al.  Power Analysis for Experimental Research: A Practical Guide for the Biological, Medical and Social Sciences , 2002 .

[27]  Christiane Fellbaum,et al.  Book Reviews: WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database , 1999, CL.

[28]  M. V. Velzen,et al.  Self-organizing maps , 2007 .

[29]  M. Tomasello Perceiving intentions and learning words in the second year of life , 2000 .

[30]  Aline Villavicencio The acquisition of a unification-based generalised categorial grammar , 2002 .

[31]  John Sinclair,et al.  Corpus, Concordance, Collocation , 1991 .

[32]  Mark Steedman,et al.  A Probabilistic Model of Syntactic and Semantic Acquisition from Child-Directed Utterances and their Meanings , 2012, EACL.

[33]  Luiz Fernando Valente,et al.  La vie en close , 1992 .

[34]  金田 重郎,et al.  C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning (書評) , 1995 .

[35]  Elena Lieven,et al.  Child Language Acquisition: Contrasting Theoretical Approaches , 2013 .

[36]  Richard N Aslin,et al.  Young children's sensitivity to probabilistic phonotactics in the developing lexicon. , 2004, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[37]  José João Almeida,et al.  Text to speech - a rewriting system approach , 2001, Proces. del Leng. Natural.

[38]  R. Horton Rules and representations , 1993, The Lancet.

[39]  J. Sawyer Comments on Clayton M. Darwin and Loretta S. Gray's “Going After the Phrasal Verb: An Alternative Approach to Classification” , 2000 .

[40]  Paul Teyssier História da língua portuguêsa , 1982 .

[41]  B. MacWhinney The CHILDES project: tools for analyzing talk , 1992 .

[42]  Carlos Ramisch,et al.  mwetoolkit: a Framework for Multiword Expression Identification , 2010, LREC.

[43]  G. Leech Corpora and theories of linguistic performance , 1992 .

[44]  G. Āllport The Psycho-Biology of Language. , 1936 .

[45]  Segismundo Spina,et al.  História da língua portuguesa , 2008 .

[46]  J. Tenenbaum,et al.  Word learning as Bayesian inference. , 2007, Psychological review.

[47]  S. M. Ali Gramática secundária e gramática histórica da língua portuguêsa , 1964 .

[48]  Adele E. Goldberg,et al.  Constructions at Work , 2005 .

[49]  Charles Yang,et al.  Three factors in language variation , 2010 .

[50]  Ted Briscoe,et al.  The Second Release of the RASP System , 2006, ACL.

[51]  Andries W. Coetzee,et al.  Grammar is both categorical and gradient , 2009 .

[52]  Timothy Baldwin,et al.  Deep Lexical Acquisition , 2003 .

[53]  Corinne R. Juhasz,et al.  Verb Particle Errors in Preschool Children With Specific Language Impairment , 2008 .

[54]  David J. C. MacKay,et al.  Information Theory, Inference, and Learning Algorithms , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[55]  Antoni Arnal Linguistic changes in the Catalan spoken in Catalonia under new contact conditions , 2011 .

[56]  J. M. Camara Problemas de lingüística descritiva , 1978 .

[57]  P. Luce,et al.  Increases in phonotactic probability facilitate spoken nonword repetition. , 2005 .

[58]  J. M. Câmara,et al.  Estrutura da língua portuguesa , 1970 .

[59]  David Adger,et al.  Core Syntax: A Minimalist Approach , 2003 .

[60]  Darren Pearce A Comparative Evaluation of Collocation Extraction Techniques , 2002, LREC.

[61]  Paula Buttery,et al.  Computational models for first language acquisition , 2006 .

[62]  Christopher D. Manning,et al.  Probabilistic models of language processing and acquisition , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[63]  Timothy Baldwin,et al.  Multiword Expressions: A Pain in the Neck for NLP , 2002, CICLing.

[64]  Claire Grover,et al.  The derivation of a large computational lexicon for English from LDOCE , 1989 .

[65]  Beth Levin,et al.  English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation , 1993 .

[66]  Adam Albright,et al.  Feature-based generalisation as a source of gradient acceptability* , 2009, Phonology.

[67]  J. Sawyer,et al.  Verb adverb and verb particle constructions : their syntax and acquisition , 1999 .

[68]  J. Siskind A computational study of cross-situational techniques for learning word-to-meaning mappings , 1996, Cognition.

[69]  Timothy Baldwin,et al.  Deep lexical acquisition of verb-particle constructions , 2005, Comput. Speech Lang..

[70]  J. M. Câmara,et al.  Para o estudo da fonêmica portuguesa , 1977 .

[71]  Bruce Hayes,et al.  A Maximum Entropy Model of Phonotactics and Phonotactic Learning , 2008, Linguistic Inquiry.

[72]  Ray Jackendoff TWISTIN' THE NIGHT AWAY , 1997 .

[73]  Paula Buttery,et al.  A Quantitative Evaluation of Naturalistic Models of Language Acquisition; the Efficiency of the Triggering Learning Algorithm Compared to a Categorial Grammar Learner , 2004, Workshop On Psycho-Computational Models Of Human Language Acquisition.

[74]  Stefan Th. Gries The influence of processing on syntactic variation: Particle placement in English , 2002 .

[75]  R. Moon Fixed Expressions and Idioms in English: A Corpus-Based Approach , 1998 .

[76]  C. Fillmore,et al.  Regularity and Idiomaticity in Grammatical Constructions: The Case of Let Alone , 1988 .

[77]  A. Lavie,et al.  Morphosyntactic annotation of CHILDES transcripts. , 2010, Journal of child language.

[78]  Paula Buttery,et al.  I will shoot your shopping down and you can shoot all my tins—Automatic Lexical Acquisition from the CHILDES Database , 2007 .