Looking at the ever-increasing amount of heterogeneous distributed applications supported on current data transport networks, it seems evident that best-effort packet delivery falls short to supply their actual needs. Multiple approaches to Quality of Service (QoS) differentiation have been proposed over the years, but their usage has always been hindered by the rigidness of the TCP/IP-based Internet model, which does not even allow for applications to express their QoS needs to the underlying network. In this context, the Recursive InterNetwork Architecture (RINA) has appeared as a clean-slate network architecture aiming to replace the current Internet based on TCP/IP. RINA provides a well-defined QoS support across layers, with standard means for layers to inform of the different QoS guarantees that they can support. Besides, applications and other processes can express their flow requirements, including different QoS-related measures, like delay and jitter, drop probability or average traffic usage. Greedy end-users, however, tend to request the highest quality for their flows, forcing providers to apply intelligent data rate limitation procedures at the edge of their networks. In this work, we propose a new rate limiting policy that, instead of enforcing limits on a per QoS class basis, imposes limits on several independent QoS dimensions. This offers a flexible traffic control to RINA network providers, while enabling end-users freely managing their leased resources. The performance of the proposed policy is assessed in an experimental RINA network test-bed and its performance compared against other policies, either RINA-specific or adopted from TCP/IP. Results show that the proposed policy achieves an effective traffic control for high QoS traffic classes, while also letting lower QoS classes to take profit of the capacity initially reserved for the former ones when available.
[1]
Rab Nawaz Bashir,et al.
Analysis of Impact of Differentiated Services (DiffServ) on the Quality of Services (QoS) Parameters of Major Services of Internet
,
2017
.
[2]
Philip Almquist,et al.
Type of Service in the Internet Protocol Suite
,
1992,
RFC.
[3]
Ibrahim Matta,et al.
Networking is IPC: a guiding principle to a better internet
,
2008,
CoNEXT '08.
[4]
Stefano Leonardi,et al.
Game-theoretic analysis of Internet switching with selfish users
,
2005,
Theor. Comput. Sci..
[5]
Peter William Thompson,et al.
An Operational Model to Control Loss and Delay of Traffic at a Network Switch
,
1999
.
[6]
P. Mermelstein.
G.722: a new CCITT coding standard for digital transmission of wideband audio signals
,
1988,
IEEE Communications Magazine.
[7]
Peter William Thompson,et al.
A Queueing Theory Model that Enables Control of Loss and Delay at a Network Switch
,
1999
.
[8]
Yan Chen,et al.
QoS Requirements of Network Applications on the Internet
,
2004,
Inf. Knowl. Syst. Manag..
[9]
Rana Muhammad Nadeem,et al.
A Formal Model for Verification of ZigBee Protocol for Secure Network Authentication
,
2017
.
[10]
John Day,et al.
Patterns in Network Architecture - A Return to Fundamentals
,
2007
.
[11]
Eduard Grasa,et al.
Assuring QoS Guarantees for Heterogeneous Services in RINA Networks with ΔQ
,
2016,
2016 IEEE International Conference on Cloud Computing Technology and Science (CloudCom).
[12]
Eduard Grasa,et al.
A software development kit to exploit RINA programmability
,
2016,
2016 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).
[13]
Eduard Grasa,et al.
SIMPLIFYING MULTI-LAYER NETWORK MANAGEMENT WITH RINA: ANALYSIS OF A MULTI-TENANT DATA CENTER NETWORK
,
2016
.