Reconciling Competing Models: A Case Study of Wine Fermentation Kinetics

Mathematical models of wine fermentation kinetics promise early diagnosis of stuck or sluggish winemaking processes as well as better matching of industrial yeast strains to specific vineyards. The economic impact of these challenges is significant: worldwide losses from stuck or sluggish fermentations are estimated at 7 billion € annually, and yeast starter production is a highly competitive market estimated at 40 million € annually. Additionally, mathematical models are an important tool for studying the biology of wine yeast fermentation through functional genomics, and contribute to our understanding of the link between genotype and phenotype for these important cell factories. We have developed an accurate combined model that best matches experimental observations over a wide range of initial conditions. This model is based on mathematical analysis of three competing ODE models for wine fermentation kinetics and statistical comparison of their predictions with a large set of experimental data. By classifying initial conditions into qualitative intervals and by systematically evaluating the competing models, we provide insight into the strengths and weaknesses of the existing models, and identify the key elements of their symbolic representation that most influence the accuracy of their predictions. In particular, we can make a distinction between main effects and secondary quadratic effects, that model interactions between cellular processes. We generalize our methodology to the common case where one wishes to combine competing models and refine them to better agree with experimental data. The first step is symbolic, and rewrites each model into a polynomial form in which main and secondary effects are conveniently expressed. The second step is statistical, classifying the match of each model's predictions with experimental data, and identifying the key terms in its equations. Finally, we use a combination of those terms to instantiate the combined model expressed in polynomial form. We show that this procedure is feasible for the case of wine fermentation kinetics, allowing predictions which closely match experimental observations in normal and problematic fermentation.

[1]  H. G. Khorana,et al.  Studies on polynucleotides , 1965 .

[2]  James F. Selgrade,et al.  Dynamical behavior of a competitive model with genetic variation , 1989 .

[3]  M. Toro,et al.  Fermentation behaviour of controlled mixed and sequential cultures of Candida cantarellii and Saccharomyces cerevisiae wine yeasts , 2002 .

[4]  J. J. Greene,et al.  Identification of interferon-modulated proliferation-related cDNA sequences. , 1987, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  F. Kargı,et al.  Bioprocess Engineering: Basic Concepts , 1991 .

[6]  S Vlassides,et al.  Using historical data for bioprocess optimization: modeling wine characteristics using artificial neural networks and archived process information. , 2001, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[7]  R. Boulton,et al.  Principles and Practices of Winemaking , 1995 .

[8]  V. Fromion,et al.  Modeling the effects of assimilable nitrogen and temperature on fermentation kinetics in enological conditions , 2004, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[9]  D. Block,et al.  Kinetic model for nitrogen‐limited wine fermentations , 2002, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[10]  Linda F. Bisson,et al.  Stuck and Sluggish Fermentations , 1999, American Journal of Enology and Viticulture.

[11]  G. Fleet Wine Microbiology and Biotechnology , 1993 .

[12]  R. Boulton,et al.  The Prediction of Fermentation Behavior by a Kinetic Model , 1980, American Journal of Enology and Viticulture.

[13]  Gustavo Scaglia,et al.  Improved phenomenological model for an isothermal winemaking fermentation , 2009 .

[14]  H. Khorana,et al.  Studies on polynucleotides. XCVI. Repair replications of short synthetic DNA's as catalyzed by DNA polymerases. , 1971, Journal of molecular biology.

[15]  G. L. Miller Use of Dinitrosalicylic Acid Reagent for Determination of Reducing Sugar , 1959 .

[16]  H. Erten,et al.  Yeast Flora During the Fermentation of Wines made from Vitis vinifera L. cv. Emir and Kalecik Karasi grown in Anatolia , 2005 .

[17]  Jacques Monod,et al.  LA TECHNIQUE DE CULTURE CONTINUE THÉORIE ET APPLICATIONS , 1978 .

[18]  Alvaro Soto,et al.  Using data mining techniques to predict industrial wine problem fermentations , 2007 .

[19]  María E Rodríguez,et al.  Influence of Candida pulcherrima Patagonian strain on alcoholic fermentation behaviour and wine aroma. , 2010, International journal of food microbiology.

[20]  J. Pérez-Ortín,et al.  Saccharomyces cerevisiae Signature Genes for Predicting Nitrogen Deficiency during Alcoholic Fermentation , 2007, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[21]  Eduardo Agosin,et al.  Modeling of yeast metabolism and process dynamics in batch fermentation , 2003, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[22]  H. Erten,et al.  Yeast Flora during the Fermentation of Wines Made from Vitis viniferaL. cv. Emir and Kalecik Karasi Grown in Anatolia , 2005 .

[23]  I. Masneuf-Pomarède,et al.  Dynamics and diversity of non-Saccharomyces yeasts during the early stages in winemaking. , 2008, International journal of food microbiology.

[24]  D. Dubourdieu,et al.  Ecology of Yeast Strain Saccharomyces cerevisiae During Spontaneous Fermentation in a Bordeaux Winery , 1992 .

[25]  P. Garijo,et al.  Analysis of yeast population during spontaneous alcoholic fermentation: effect of the age of the cellar and the practice of inoculation. , 2005, International journal of food microbiology.

[26]  B.P. Zeigler,et al.  Variable DEVS-variable structure modeling formalism: an adaptive computer architecture application , 1994, Fifth Annual Conference on AI, and Planning in High Autonomy Systems.

[27]  Claudio Bruno,et al.  Coupling kinetic expressions and metabolic networks for predicting wine fermentations , 2007, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[28]  David E. Block,et al.  Temperature-Dependent Kinetic Model for Nitrogen-Limited Wine Fermentations , 2007, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[29]  David E. Block,et al.  Use of Decision Tree Analysis for Determination of Critical Enological and Viticultural Processing Parameters in Historical Databases , 2001 .

[30]  G. Fleet,et al.  Evolution of Yeasts and Lactic Acid Bacteria During Fermentation and Storage of Bordeaux Wines , 1984, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[31]  J. Pérez-Ortín,et al.  Transcriptional Response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to Different Nitrogen Concentrations during Alcoholic Fermentation , 2007, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[32]  J. Derisi,et al.  Functional genomic analysis of a commercial wine strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae under differing nitrogen conditions. , 2001, FEMS yeast research.

[33]  P. Teissier,et al.  A hybrid recurrent neural network model for yeast production monitoring and control in a wine base medium , 1997 .

[34]  James D. Murray Mathematical Biology: I. An Introduction , 2007 .

[35]  G. Fleet,et al.  Acetic Acid Bacteria in Winemaking: A Review , 1988, American Journal of Enology and Viticulture.