The usefulness of a performance measurement system in the daily life of an organisation: a note on a case study

Abstract The design and introduction of performance measurement systems in business organisations continues to be one of the areas within Management Accounting that attracts a great deal of interest. We have focused on this field using the case study method, a research approach which is helpful for the development of greater understanding of innovative management accounting systems, discarding other methods, such as data collection through surveys. The research work we present here aims to examine the usefulness of performance indicators in a Spanish subsidiary of a North American multinational company dedicated to the car sector. The present performance measurement system, which undergoes annual revisions, was designed and introduced by the management team of the Spanish plant and does not exist in any other plant in the group with the same structure and complexity. How it works is not therefore the result of any imposition by headquarters but is rather the result of negotiation and consensus within the plant itself, its main aim being to motivate behaviour. Access to a wealth of both quantitative and qualitative information has enabled us to (i) observe the integration of this performance measurement system within the organisational structure of the plant, its continuing revision, the resources it has at its disposal, its usefulness for achieving employee involvement, its capacity to motivate learning, its relation with the incentive system, and also (ii) to suggest a correlation between certain measures of the performance measurement system and profitability.

[1]  David Otley,et al.  Extending the Boundaries of Management Accounting Research: Developing Systems for Performance Management☆ , 2001 .

[2]  R. Johnston,et al.  Performance Measurement in Service Businesses , 1992 .

[3]  S. Mark Young,et al.  Frontiers of management accounting research , 1997 .

[4]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[5]  R. Kaplan,et al.  The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action , 1996 .

[6]  Anthony J. Berry,et al.  Case study research in management accounting and control , 1994 .

[7]  R. Kaplan,et al.  Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system , 1996 .

[8]  R. Kaplan,et al.  Transforming the Balanced Scorecard from Performance Measurement to Strategic Management: Part II , 2001 .

[9]  Kelvin F. Cross,et al.  Measure Up!: Yardsticks for Continuous Improvement , 1991 .

[10]  Ramji Balakrishnan,et al.  New directions in management accounting research , 1997 .

[11]  M. Lebas Managerial accounting in France Overview of past tradition and current practice , 1994 .

[12]  Lin Fitzgerald,et al.  Delivering the goods at TNT: the role of the performance measurement system , 1996 .

[13]  M. C. Jensen,et al.  Specific and General Knowledge and Organizational Structure , 1995 .

[14]  Ève Chiapello,et al.  Les tableaux de bord de gestion, outils d'introduction du changement , 1994 .

[15]  R. Scapens Researching management accounting practice: The role of case study methods , 1990 .

[16]  Michael D. Shields Research in management accounting by North Americans in the 1990s , 1997 .