A comparison of EWMA control charts for dispersion based on estimated parameters

Abstract The exponentially weighted moving average (EWMA) chart for dispersion is designed to detect structural changes in the process dispersion quickly. The various existing designs of the EWMA chart for dispersion differ in the choice of the dispersion measure used. The most popular choice in the literature is the logarithm of the variance. Other possibilities are the sample variance and the sample standard deviation. In practical applications, parameter estimates are needed to set up the chart before monitoring can start. Once process parameters are estimated, the performance is conditional on the estimates obtained. It is well known that using so-called Phase I estimates affect the performance of control charts. We compare three EWMA dispersion charts based on Phase I estimates. We compare the conditional performance under normally distributed data as well as non-normally distributed data, in order to compare the robustness of the various charts. We show that the chart based on the sample variance is least influenced by estimation error under normally distributed data. We also show that the chart based on the logarithm of the variance shows the most constant performance under deviations from the normality assumption. As we are never sure in practice if the normality assumption is exactly satisfied, we argue that the chart which is most robust to the normality assumption - the chart based on the logarithm of the variance - should be used in practice.

[1]  Wei Jiang,et al.  A New EWMA Chart for Monitoring Process Dispersion , 2008 .

[2]  Eugenio K. Epprecht,et al.  Shewhart control charts for dispersion adjusted for parameter estimation , 2017 .

[3]  Min Zhang,et al.  Exponential CUSUM Charts with Estimated Control Limits , 2014, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..

[4]  Stelios Psarakis,et al.  An Examination of the Robustness to Non Normality of the EWMA Control Charts for the Dispersion , 2005 .

[5]  Stephen V. Crowder,et al.  An EWMA for Monitoring a Process Standard Deviation , 1992 .

[6]  Ronald J. M. M. Does,et al.  A Robust Phase I Exponentially Weighted Moving Average Chart for Dispersion , 2015, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..

[7]  Saddam Akber Abbasi,et al.  On Proper Choice of Variability Control Chart for Normal and Non‐normal Processes , 2012, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..

[8]  Sven Knoth,et al.  Accurate ARL computation for EWMA-S2 control charts , 2005, Stat. Comput..

[9]  Charles W. Champ,et al.  The Performance of Exponentially Weighted Moving Average Charts With Estimated Parameters , 2001, Technometrics.

[10]  Philippe Castagliola,et al.  Computational Statistics and Data Analysis an Ewma Chart for Monitoring the Process Standard Deviation When Parameters Are Estimated , 2022 .

[11]  Eugenio K. Epprecht,et al.  Estimating the Standard Deviation in Quality-Control Applications , 2010 .

[12]  Philippe Castagliola,et al.  Some Recent Developments on the Effects of Parameter Estimation on Control Charts , 2014, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..

[13]  CESAR A. Acosta-Mejia,et al.  A comparison of control charting procedures for monitoring process dispersion , 1999 .

[14]  S. W. Roberts Control chart tests based on geometric moving averages , 2000 .

[15]  Muhammad Riaz,et al.  CS‐EWMA Chart for Monitoring Process Dispersion , 2013, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..

[16]  Sven Knoth Run length quantiles of EWMA control charts monitoring normal mean or/and variance , 2015 .

[17]  Ronald J. M. M. Does,et al.  A Robust Estimator for Location in Phase I Based on an EWMA Chart , 2014 .

[18]  Eugenio K. Epprecht,et al.  Effect of the Amount of Phase I Data on the Phase II Performance of S2 and S Control Charts , 2015 .

[19]  Bing Xing Wang,et al.  The Design of the ARL‐Unbiased S2 Chart When the In‐Control Variance Is Estimated , 2015, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..

[20]  Saddam Akber Abbasi,et al.  EWMA Dispersion Control Charts for Normal and Non-normal Processes , 2015, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..

[21]  Philippe Castagliola,et al.  A New S2‐EWMA Control Chart for Monitoring the Process Variance , 2005 .

[22]  Mahmoud A. Mahmoud,et al.  The Inertial Properties of Quality Control Charts , 2005, Technometrics.

[23]  Kwok-Leung Tsui,et al.  Personalized Health Monitoring System of Elderly Wellness at the Community Level in Hong Kong , 2018, IEEE Access.

[24]  Sven Knoth Control Charting Normal Variance – Reflections, Curiosities, and Recommendations , 2010 .

[25]  Xian Liu,et al.  Survival Analysis: Models and Applications , 2012 .

[26]  William H. Woodall,et al.  A head-to-head comparative study of the conditional performance of control charts based on estimated parameters , 2017 .

[27]  Sidney Addelman,et al.  trans-Dimethanolbis(1,1,1-trifluoro-5,5-dimethylhexane-2,4-dionato)zinc(II) , 2008, Acta crystallographica. Section E, Structure reports online.

[28]  Charles W. Champ,et al.  Effects of Parameter Estimation on Control Chart Properties: A Literature Review , 2006 .

[29]  William H. Woodall,et al.  Another Look at the EWMA Control Chart with Estimated Parameters , 2015 .

[30]  William H. Woodall,et al.  Guaranteed conditional performance of the S2 control chart with estimated parameters , 2015 .