Bayesian Approach to Patient-Tailored Vectorcardiography

For assessment of specific cardiac pathologies, vectorcardiography is generally considered superior with respect to electrocardiography. Existing vectorcardiography methods operate by calculating the vectorcardiogram (VCG) as a fixed linear combination of ECG signals. These methods, with the inverse Dower matrix method the current standard, are therefore not flexible with respect to different body compositions and geometries. Hence, they cannot be applied with accuracy on patients that do not conform to the fixed standard. Typical examples of such patients are obese patients or fetuses. For the latter category, when recording the fetal ECG from the maternal abdomen the distance of the fetal heart with respect to the electrodes is unknown. Consequently, also the signal attenuation/transformation per electrode is not known. In this paper, a Bayesian method is developed that estimates the VCG and, to some extent, also the signal attenuation in multichannel ECG recordings from either the adult 12-lead ECG or the maternal abdomen. This is done by determining for which VCG and signal attenuation the joint probability over both these variables is maximal given the observed ECG signals. The underlying joint probability distribution is determined by assuming the ECG signals to originate from scaled VCG projections and additive noise. With this method, a VCG, tailored to each specific patient, is determined. The method is compared to the inverse Dower matrix method by applying both methods on standard 12-lead ECG recordings and evaluating the performance in predicting ECG signals from the determined VCG. In addition, to model nonstandard patients, the 12-lead ECG signals are randomly scaled and, once more, the performance in predicting ECG signals from the VCG is compared between both methods. Finally, both methods are also compared on fetal ECG signals that are obtained from the maternal abdomen. For patients conforming to the standard, both methods perform similarly, with the developed method performing marginally better. For scaled ECG signals and fetal ECG signals, the developed method significantly outperforms the inverse Dower matrix method.

[1]  H. C. Burger,et al.  HEART-VECTOR AND LEADS. , 1948, British heart journal.

[2]  L. Sornmo Vectorcardiographic loop alignment and morphologic beat-to-beat variability , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  Kevin H. Knuth,et al.  Bayesian source separation and localization , 1998, Optics & Photonics.

[4]  M. Tribus,et al.  Probability theory: the logic of science , 2003 .

[5]  Bin He,et al.  Noninvasive reconstruction of three-dimensional ventricular activation sequence from the inverse solution of distributed equivalent current density , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[6]  K. Greene,et al.  Changes in the ST waveform of the fetal lamb electrocardiogram with hypoxemia. , 1982, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[7]  Massimo Mischi,et al.  Estimation of internal uterine pressure by joint amplitude and frequency analysis of electrohysterographic signals , 2008, Physiological measurement.

[8]  O. Pahlm,et al.  Vectorcardiogram synthesized from a 12-lead ECG: superiority of the inverse Dower matrix. , 1988, Journal of electrocardiology.

[9]  R Vullings,et al.  Dynamic segmentation and linear prediction for maternal ECG removal in antenatal abdominal recordings , 2009, Physiological measurement.

[10]  L. Horan,et al.  A rapid assay of dipolar and extradipolar content in the human electrocardiogram. , 1972, Journal of electrocardiology.

[11]  G. Huiskamp,et al.  An improved method for estimating epicardial potentials from the body surface , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[12]  G. Dower,et al.  On Deriving the Electrocardiogram from Vectorcardiographic Leads , 1980, Clinical cardiology.

[13]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[14]  David B. Geselowitz,et al.  On the theory of the electrocardiogram , 1989, Proc. IEEE.

[15]  D A BRODY,et al.  Principal Factor Waveforms of the Thoracic QRS Complex , 1964, Circulation research.

[16]  Radford M. Neal Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning , 2007, Technometrics.

[17]  H. C. Burger,et al.  HEART-VECTOR AND LEADS. , 1946, British heart journal.

[18]  E. Frank An Accurate, Clinically Practical System For Spatial Vectorcardiography , 1956, Circulation.

[19]  R. Granit THE HEART ( Extract from “ Principles and Applications of Bioelectric and Biomagnetic Fields , 2005 .

[20]  J. Michael Textbook of Medical Physiology , 2005 .

[21]  L Sörnmo,et al.  Vectorcardiographic loop alignment and morphologic beat-to-beat variability. , 1998, IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering.

[22]  A. John Camm,et al.  The Esc Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine , 2009 .

[23]  L. R. Gieszl,et al.  Hint for squint: a computer reliant diagnostic aid for strabismus , 1983 .

[24]  R Vullings,et al.  Fetal movement quantification by fetal vectorcardiography: A preliminary study , 2008, 2008 30th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[25]  W. Marsden I and J , 2012 .

[26]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Bayesian fMRI time series analysis with spatial priors , 2005, NeuroImage.

[27]  Jeffrey D. Lewine,et al.  Reconstruction of Fetal Cardiac Vectors From Multichannel fMCG Data Using Recursively Applied and Projected Multiple Signal Classification , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[28]  Bin He,et al.  Imaging and visualization of 3-D cardiac electric activity , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[29]  R. Barr,et al.  Relating Epicardial to Body Surface Potential Distributions by Means of Transfer Coefficients Based on Geometry Measurements , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[30]  B. Drew,et al.  Comparison of a vectorcardiographically derived 12-lead electrocardiogram with the conventional electrocardiogram during wide QRS complex tachycardia, and its potential application for continuous bedside monitoring. , 1992, The American journal of cardiology.

[31]  M Macklin,et al.  Changes in the conduction of the fetal electrocardiogram to the maternal abdominal surface during gestation. , 1977, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[32]  R Hoekema,et al.  On selecting a body surface mapping procedure. , 1999, Journal of Electrocardiology.

[33]  D. Geselowitz,et al.  DIPOLE THEORY IN ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY. , 1964, The American journal of cardiology.

[34]  C. V. Nelson,et al.  Determination of the Resultant Dipole of the Heart from Measurements on the Body Surface , 1954 .

[35]  Y. Takane,et al.  Generalized Inverse Matrices , 2011 .

[36]  F. Roberge,et al.  Moving Dipole Inverse ECG and EEG Solutions , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[37]  Y. Yamashita,et al.  Use of the Finite Element Method to Determine Epicardial from Body Surface Potentials Under a Realistic Torso Model , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[38]  D. Levy,et al.  Obesity and the risk of heart failure. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.