Concept Development in Learning Physics: The Case of Electric Current and Voltage Revisited

In learning conceptual knowledge in physics, a common problem is the development and differentiation of concepts in the learning process. An important part of this development process is the re-organisation or re-structuring process in which students’ conceptual knowledge and concepts change. This study proposes a new view of concept development with explicit attention given to concept development from the level of knowledge-as-pieces to the level of knowledge-as-theory. The proposed new picture is based on the view that concepts are complex constructs essentially embedded in a larger system of knowledge. Three closely connected aspects require our attention: (1) conceptions of concepts, (2) conceptions of knowledge systems, and finally, (3) conceptions of the process of change. The potential advantages of this prospective are demonstrated through the re-analysis of the concept development in the well-known case of electric current and voltage. The results show that in the concept development process, both causal knowledge and coherence of the knowledge system play crucial roles. Finally, the study points out how the theoretical position proposed here directly impacts conceptions of learning and instruction as well as what solutions are sought for problems in learning—or even what is considered a problem or success in learning.

[1]  A. diSessa Why “Conceptual Ecology” is a Good Idea , 2002 .

[2]  A. diSessa Toward an Epistemology of Physics , 1993 .

[3]  A. diSessa Between Brain and Behavior: Response to Marton , 1993 .

[4]  James D. Slotta,et al.  Helping Students Understand Challenging Topics in Science Through Ontology Training , 2006 .

[5]  L. Mason,et al.  Reconsidering conceptual change: issues in theory and practice , 2002 .

[6]  S. Ohlsson,et al.  Resubsumption: A Possible Mechanism for Conceptual Change and Belief Revision , 2009 .

[7]  Nancy Law,et al.  Explorations in promoting conceptual change in electrical concepts via ontological category shift , 2001 .

[8]  A. diSessa,et al.  What changes in conceptual change , 1998 .

[9]  Stella Vosniadou,et al.  International handbook of research on conceptual change , 2013 .

[10]  Dimitris Psillos,et al.  Causal structures and counter-intuitive experiments in electricity , 1997 .

[11]  David Shipstone,et al.  A study of children's understanding of electricity in simple DC circuits , 1984 .

[12]  J. Slotta In Defense of Chi's Ontological Incompatibility Hypothesis , 2011 .

[13]  M. Chi,et al.  Naive Physics Reasoning: A Commitment to Substance-Based Conceptions , 2000 .

[14]  Robert J. Beichner,et al.  Students’ understanding of direct current resistive electrical circuits , 2004 .

[15]  S. Vosniadou On the Nature of Naïve Physics , 2002 .

[16]  S. Carey,et al.  On differentiation: A case study of the development of the concepts of size, weight, and density , 1985, Cognition.

[17]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  Categories and concepts , 1984 .

[18]  Bob Rehder,et al.  Categorization as causal reasoning , 2003, Cogn. Sci..

[19]  B. Eylon,et al.  Potential difference and current in simple electric circuits: A study of students’ concepts , 1983 .

[20]  G. S. Ohm,et al.  Die galvanische Kette , 1827 .

[21]  Ayush Gupta,et al.  The Case for Dynamic Models of Learners' Ontologies in Physics , 2010 .

[22]  P. Thagard,et al.  Computational Philosophy of Science , 1988 .

[23]  C. Peacocke A Study of Concepts , 1994 .

[24]  A. Gopnik,et al.  Words, thoughts, and theories , 1997 .

[25]  Michelene T. H. Chi,et al.  Contrasting Ohlsson's Resubsumption Theory With Chi's Categorical Shift Theory , 2009 .

[26]  David Hammer,et al.  Conceptual change in physics , 2013 .

[27]  J. Pearl Causality: Models, Reasoning and Inference , 2000 .

[28]  S. Vosniadou The Framework Theory Approach to the Problem of Conceptual Change , 2009 .

[29]  P. Thagard,et al.  Coherence in Thought and Action , 2000 .

[30]  Andrea A. diSessa,et al.  A bird's-eye view of the "pieces" vs "coherence" controversy (from the "pieces" side of the fence") , 2013 .

[31]  G. Murphy,et al.  The Big Book of Concepts , 2002 .

[32]  Lillian C. McDermott,et al.  Research as a guide for curriculum development: An example from introductory electricity , 1992 .

[33]  C. Glymour,et al.  Making Things Happen: A Theory of Causal Explanation , 2004 .

[34]  K. Lehrer Theory Of Knowledge , 1990 .

[35]  Douglas B. Clark,et al.  An Overview of Conceptual Change Theories. , 2007 .

[36]  Terry J. Christlieb,et al.  The Structure of Empirical Knowledge. , 1987 .

[37]  Michelene T. H. Chi,et al.  Commonsense Conceptions of Emergent Processes: Why Some Misconceptions Are Robust , 2005 .

[38]  E. Machery Doing without Concepts , 2009 .

[39]  M. Chi Three Types of Conceptual Change: Belief Revision, Mental Model Transformation, and Categorical Shift , 2009 .

[40]  Joshua B. Tenenbaum,et al.  The Structure and Dynamics of Scientific Theories: A Hierarchical Bayesian Perspective* , 2010, Philosophy of Science.

[41]  S. Carey The Origin of Concepts , 2000 .

[42]  James D. Slotta,et al.  The Ontological Coherence of Intuitive Physics , 1993 .

[43]  Jennifer B. Esterly,et al.  Coherence versus fragmentation in the development of the concept of force , 2004 .

[44]  Tamer G. Amin,et al.  “Is heat hot?” Inducing conceptual change by integrating everyday and scientific perspectives on thermal phenomena , 2001 .