In 1959, Richard Feynman pointed out that nanometre-scale machines could be built and operated, and that the precision inherent in molecular construction would make it easy to build multiple identical copies. This raised the possibility of exponential manufacturing, in which production systems could rapidly and cheaply increase their productive capacity, which in turn suggested the possibility of destructive runaway self-replication. Early proposals for artificial nanomachinery focused on small self-replicating machines, discussing their potential productivity and their potential destructiveness if abused. In the light of controversy regarding scenarios based on runaway replication (so-called 'grey goo'), a review of current thinking regarding nanotechnology-based manufacturing is in order. Nanotechnology-based fabrication can be thoroughly non-biological and inherently safe: such systems need have no ability to move about, use natural resources, or undergo incremental mutation. Moreover, self-replication is unnecessary: the development and use of highly productive systems of nanomachinery (nanofactories) need not involve the construction of autonomous self-replicating nanomachines. Accordingly, the construction of anything resembling a dangerous self-replicating nanomachine can and should be prohibited. Although advanced nanotechnologies could (with great difficulty and little incentive) be used to build such devices, other concerns present greater problems. Since weapon systems will be both easier to build and more likely to draw investment, the potential for dangerous systems is best considered in the context of military competition and arms control.
[1]
R. Smalley.
Of chemistry, love and nanobots.
,
2001,
Scientific American.
[2]
Drexler Ke,et al.
Molecular engineering: An approach to the development of general capabilities for molecular manipulation.
,
1981,
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[3]
K E Drexler,et al.
Molecular engineering: An approach to the development of general capabilities for molecular manipulation.
,
1981,
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[4]
Chris Phoenix.
Design of a Primitive Nanofactory
,
2003
.