Aftershock response of RC buildings in Santiago, Chile, succeeding the magnitude 8.8 Maule earthquake

Abstract Between March 13th and 28th 2010, a team of U.S. researchers, professionals, and local collaborators instrumented four reinforced concrete (RC) buildings in Santiago, Chile, to measure aftershock response data following the February 27, 2010 MW 8.8 earthquake. The selected buildings, designed according to NCh433.Of96 (similar to ACI 318-95), represent typical construction, e.g. moderate to high rise office buildings with large office space and inner core shear walls and mid-rise residential shear wall buildings. Two of the instrumented buildings were undamaged, whereas one building suffered only minor non-structural damage and the fourth building exhibited more significant structural damage such as column buckling and shear wall cracking. Instrumentation consisted mainly of uni-axial and tri-axial accelerometers as well as some displacement transducers. Records for several aftershocks were captured during a period of one month. Collected data were processed and system identification algorithms were used to determine dynamic building- and modeling parameters (e.g. building periods, acceleration amplification, inter-story drifts, building rocking and torsion, and assessment of diaphragm in-plane rigidity). A comparison between linear elastic models used in engineering practice and measured data was performed for one building. Information related to the instrumented buildings, data collected, and analytical results is presented, along with practical lessons learned conducting monitoring studies in the aftermath of this very strong earthquake.

[1]  Leonardo M. Massone,et al.  Fundamental principles of the reinforced concrete design code changes in Chile following the Mw 8.8 earthquake in 2010 , 2013 .

[2]  Anil K. Chopra,et al.  Period formulas for moment-resisting frame buildings , 1997 .

[3]  Anil K. Chopra,et al.  PERIOD FORMULAS FOR CONCRETE SHEAR WALL BUILDINGS , 1998 .

[4]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  Damage identification and health monitoring of structural and mechanical systems from changes in their vibration characteristics: A literature review , 1996 .

[5]  Ying Lei,et al.  Identification, Model Updating, and Response Prediction of an Instrumented 15-Story Steel-Frame Building , 2006 .

[6]  María Ofelia Moroni,et al.  Behavior of Instrumented Base-Isolated Structures during the 27 February 2010 Chile Earthquake , 2012 .

[7]  M. Celebi,et al.  Real-Time Seismic Monitoring Needs of a Building Owner—and the Solution: A Cooperative Effort , 2004 .

[8]  Anil K. Chopra,et al.  Elastic Earthquake Analysis of a Class of Torsionally Coupled Buildings , 1977 .

[9]  John W. Wallace,et al.  Forced Vibration Testing of a Four-Story Reinforced Concrete Building Utilizing the nees @UCLA Mobile Field Laboratory , 2008 .

[10]  Jack P. Moehle,et al.  Seismic Design and Construction Practices for RC Structural Wall Buildings , 2012 .

[11]  John W. Wallace,et al.  Forced Vibration Testing of a Four Story RC Building Utilizing the nees@UCLA Mobile Field Laboratory , 2006 .

[12]  Jack P. Moehle,et al.  Damage and Implications for Seismic Design of RC Structural Wall Buildings , 2012 .

[13]  Farzad Naeim Performance of 20 extensively‐instrumented buildings during the 1994 Northridge earthquake , 1998 .