Interlaboratory comparison of real-time PCR protocols for quantification of general fecal indicator bacteria.

The application of quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) technologies for the rapid identification of fecal bacteria in environmental waters is being considered for use as a national water quality metric in the United States. The transition from research tool to a standardized protocol requires information on the reproducibility and sources of variation associated with qPCR methodology across laboratories. This study examines interlaboratory variability in the measurement of enterococci and Bacteroidales concentrations from standardized, spiked, and environmental sources of DNA using the Entero1a and GenBac3 qPCR methods, respectively. Comparisons are based on data generated from eight different research facilities. Special attention was placed on the influence of the DNA isolation step and effect of simplex and multiplex amplification approaches on interlaboratory variability. Results suggest that a crude lysate is sufficient for DNA isolation unless environmental samples contain substances that can inhibit qPCR amplification. No appreciable difference was observed between simplex and multiplex amplification approaches. Overall, interlaboratory variability levels remained low (<10% coefficient of variation) regardless of qPCR protocol.

[1]  Jian-Wen He,et al.  Quantification of Enterococci and Human Adenoviruses in Environmental Samples by Real-Time PCR , 2005, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[2]  R. Haugland,et al.  Characterization of PicoGreen reagent and development of a fluorescence-based solution assay for double-stranded DNA quantitation. , 1997, Analytical biochemistry.

[3]  Alfred P. Dufour,et al.  Rapidly Measured Indicators of Recreational Water Quality Are Predictive of Swimming-Associated Gastrointestinal Illness , 2005, Environmental health perspectives.

[4]  Linda K. Dick,et al.  Rapid Estimation of Numbers of Fecal Bacteroidetes by Use of a Quantitative PCR Assay for 16S rRNA Genes , 2004, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[5]  Orin C. Shanks,et al.  Differential decay of human faecal Bacteroides in marine and freshwater. , 2011, Environmental microbiology.

[6]  Daniel E. Williams,et al.  Factors influencing the persistence of fecal Bacteroides in stream water. , 2009, Journal of environmental quality.

[7]  P. Rådström,et al.  Effects of Amplification Facilitators on Diagnostic PCR in the Presence of Blood, Feces, and Meat , 2000, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[8]  C. Kreader.  Relief of amplification inhibition in PCR with bovine serum albumin or T4 gene 32 protein , 1996, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[9]  C. Schulz,et al.  Fecal Bacteroidales Diversity and Decay in Response to Variations in Temperature and Salinity , 2011, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[10]  U. Obst,et al.  Application of the fluorogenic probe technique (TaqMan PCR) to the detection of Enterococcus spp. and Escherichia coli in water samples. , 2003, Journal of microbiological methods.

[11]  I G Wilson,et al.  Inhibition and facilitation of nucleic acid amplification , 1997, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[12]  Orin C. Shanks,et al.  Evaluation of genetic markers from the 16S rRNA gene V2 region for use in quantitative detection of selected Bacteroidales species and human fecal waste by qPCR. , 2010, Systematic and applied microbiology.

[13]  K. Nelson,et al.  Concentrations of host-specific and generic fecal markers measured by quantitative PCR in raw sewage and fresh animal feces. , 2009, Water research.

[14]  Roger Woodgate,et al.  Molecular breeding of polymerases for resistance to environmental inhibitors , 2011, Nucleic acids research.

[15]  V. Beneš,et al.  The MIQE guidelines: minimum information for publication of quantitative real-time PCR experiments. , 2009, Clinical chemistry.

[16]  K. Schleifer,et al.  How quantitative is quantitative PCR with respect to cell counts? , 2000, Systematic and applied microbiology.

[17]  J. Peccia,et al.  Evaluation of the enterococci indicator in biosolids using culture-based and quantitative PCR assays. , 2009, Water research.

[18]  R. Whitman,et al.  Relationship and variation of qPCR and culturable Enterococci estimates in ambient surface waters are predictable. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[19]  Richard A Haugland,et al.  Comparison of Enterococcus measurements in freshwater at two recreational beaches by quantitative polymerase chain reaction and membrane filter culture analysis. , 2005, Water research.

[20]  M. Pfaffl,et al.  Effects of Plate Position, Plate Type and Sealing Systems on Real-Time PCR Results , 2008 .

[21]  G. Wiseman.  State of the art and limitations of quantitative polymerase chain reaction. , 2002, Journal of AOAC International.

[22]  R. Clark,et al.  Predicting Chlorine Residuals in Drinking Water: Second Order Model , 2002 .

[23]  A. Boehm,et al.  Persistence of nucleic acid markers of health-relevant organisms in seawater microcosms: implications for their use in assessing risk in recreational waters. , 2009, Water Research.

[24]  Mano Sivaganesan,et al.  Performance of PCR-based assays targeting Bacteroidales genetic markers of human fecal pollution in sewage and fecal samples. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[25]  Daniel E. Williams,et al.  Development of Bacteroides 16S rRNA Gene TaqMan-Based Real-Time PCR Assays for Estimation of Total, Human, and Bovine Fecal Pollution in Water , 2006, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[26]  S. Wuertz,et al.  16S rRNA-based assays for quantitative detection of universal, human-, cow-, and dog-specific fecal Bacteroidales: a Bayesian approach. , 2007, Water research.

[27]  H. Parkes,et al.  Interlaboratory study on thermal cycler performance in controlled PCR and random amplified polymorphic DNA analyses. , 2001, Clinical chemistry.

[28]  Orin C. Shanks,et al.  Quantitative PCR for Detection and Enumeration of Genetic Markers of Bovine Fecal Pollution , 2007, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[29]  L. Wymer,et al.  Improved real-time PCR assays for the detection of fecal indicator bacteria in surface waters with different instrument and reagent systems. , 2008, Journal of water and health.

[30]  Inchul Yang,et al.  Performance evaluation of thermal cyclers for PCR in a rapid cycling condition. , 2008, BioTechniques.

[31]  Alfred P. Dufour,et al.  High Sensitivity of Children to Swimming-Associated Gastrointestinal Illness: Results Using a Rapid Assay of Recreational Water Quality , 2008, Epidemiology.