A user-centred approach to requirements elicitation in medical device development: a case study from an industry perspective.

The healthcare industry is dependent upon the provision of well designed medical devices. To achieve this it is recommended that user-centred design should begin early, and continue throughout device development. This is a challenge, particularly for smaller companies who may lack the necessary expertise and knowledge. The aim of this study was to conduct a rigorous yet focused investigation into the user requirements for a new medical imaging device. Open-ended semi-structured interviews were conducted with potential clinical users of the device to investigate the clinical need for the device and the potential benefits for patients and clinical users. The study identified a number of new and significant clinical needs that suggested that the concept of the device should be fundamentally changed. The clinical and organisational priorities of the clinical users were identified, as well as a number of factors that would act as barriers to the safe and effective adoption of the device. The developers reported that this focused approach to early requirements elicitation would result in an improved product, reduce the time to market, and save the time and cost of producing and evaluating an inappropriate prototype.

[1]  C. Prahalad,et al.  Competing for the Future , 1994 .

[2]  Mary Beth Rosson,et al.  The task-artifact cycle , 1991 .

[3]  William J. Abernathy,et al.  Managing our way to economic decline , 2007 .

[4]  P. Bucklea,et al.  Patient safety, systems design and ergonomics , 2006 .

[5]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[6]  Karin Garmer,et al.  User participation in requirements elicitation comparing focus group interviews and usability tests for eliciting usability requirements for medical equipment: a case study , 2004 .

[7]  J Gosbee,et al.  Human factors engineering and patient safety , 2002, Quality & safety in health care.

[8]  Rachel Cooper,et al.  “Requirements capture”: theory and practice , 1998 .

[9]  John Amoore,et al.  Learning from adverse incidents involving medical devices. , 2003, Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987).

[10]  N. Denzin,et al.  Handbook of Qualitative Research , 1994 .

[11]  Robert W. Veryzer.  Key factors affecting customer evaluation of discontinuous new products , 1998 .

[12]  Anna-Lisa Osvalder,et al.  Setting the Requirements for a User-Friendly Infusion Pump , 2000 .

[13]  Tom Wengraf,et al.  Qualitative Research Interviewing , 2001 .

[14]  L. Leape.  Error in Medicine , 1994 .

[15]  Tom Wengraf.  Qualitative Research Interviewing: Biographic Narrative and Semi-Structured Methods , 2001 .

[16]  Myung Hwan Yun,et al.  Proceedings of the XIVth Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association and 44th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Association, 'Ergonomics for the New Millennium' , 2000 .

[17]  Gina Colarelli O'Connor,et al.  The nature of market visioning for technology-based radical innovation , 2001 .

[18]  John Amoore,et al.  Learning from adverse incidents involving medical devices , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[19]  Jennifer L. Martin,et al.  MATCH: a new industry-focused approach to medical device development , 2005 .

[20]  Elizabeth Murphy,et al.  Capturing user requirements in medical device development: the role of ergonomics , 2006, Physiological measurement.

[21]  T. Caeiro,et al.  [Error in medicine]. , 2004, Medicina.

[22]  Kim J. Vicente,et al.  Applying Human Factors to the Design of Medical Equipment: Patient-Controlled Analgesia , 1998, Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing.

[23]  J. Oktay.  Grounded Theory , 2012 .

[24]  Frank A. Fasick,et al.  Some Uses of Untranscribed Tape Recordings in Survey Research , 1977 .

[25]  Mala Bridgelal Ram,et al.  Issues and challenges of involving users in medical device development , 2008, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[26]  Karin Garmer,et al.  Arguing for the Need of Triangulation and Iteration when Designing Medical Equipment , 2002, Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing.

[27]  Jeanne Merkle.  Interviews in qualitative nursing research: differing approaches for ethnographic and phenomenological studies , 1995 .

[28]  Zheng Jian.  Discussion of IEC 60601-1-4:2000 Medical Electrical Equipment-Part 1-4:General Requirements for Safety-Collateral Standard:Programmable Electrical Medical Systems , 2007 .

[29]  David D. Woods,et al.  Users as Designers: How People Cope with Poor HCI Design in Computer-Based Medical Devices , 1994, Hum. Factors.

[30]  Elizabeth Murphy,et al.  Medical device development: the challenge for ergonomics. , 2008, Applied ergonomics.