Integration of Active and Passive Safety Technologies--A Method to Study and Estimate Field Capability.

The objective of this study is to develop a method that uses a combination of field data analysis, naturalistic driving data analysis, and computational simulations to explore the potential injury reduction capabilities of integrating passive and active safety systems in frontal impact conditions. For the purposes of this study, the active safety system is actually a driver assist (DA) feature that has the potential to reduce delta-V prior to a crash, in frontal or other crash scenarios. A field data analysis was first conducted to estimate the delta-V distribution change based on an assumption of 20% crash avoidance resulting from a pre-crash braking DA feature. Analysis of changes in driver head location during 470 hard braking events in a naturalistic driving study found that drivers' head positions were mostly in the center position before the braking onset, while the percentage of time drivers leaning forward or backward increased significantly after the braking onset. Parametric studies with a total of 4800 MADYMO simulations showed that both delta-V and occupant pre-crash posture had pronounced effects on occupant injury risks and on the optimal restraint designs. By combining the results for the delta-V and head position distribution changes, a weighted average of injury risk reduction of 17% and 48% was predicted by the 50th percentile Anthropomorphic Test Device (ATD) model and human body model, respectively, with the assumption that the restraint system can adapt to the specific delta-V and pre-crash posture. This study demonstrated the potential for further reducing occupant injury risk in frontal crashes by the integration of a passive safety system with a DA feature. Future analyses considering more vehicle models, various crash conditions, and variations of occupant characteristics, such as age, gender, weight, and height, are necessary to further investigate the potential capability of integrating passive and DA or active safety systems.

[1]  Arthur F. Kramer,et al.  Influence of Age and Proximity Warning Devices on Collision Avoidance in Simulated Driving , 2007, Hum. Factors.

[2]  L Evans,et al.  The effectiveness of safety belts in preventing fatalities. , 1986, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[3]  James R. Sayer,et al.  Integrated vehicle-based safety systems field operational test final program report. , 2011 .

[4]  George Bahouth,et al.  Characteristics of crashes that increase the risk of serious injuries. , 2003, Annual proceedings. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine.

[5]  Matthew P. Reed,et al.  Effects of obesity on occupant responses in frontal crashes: a simulation analysis using human body models , 2015, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[6]  Daisuke Ito,et al.  Crash Sled Test Based Evaluation of a Precrash Seatbelt and an Airbag to Enhance Protection of Small Drivers in Vehicles Equipped with Autonomous Emergency Braking Systems , 2013 .

[7]  Dainius J. Dalmotas,et al.  An NCAP Star Rating System for Older Occupants , 2013 .

[8]  Brian N. Fildes,et al.  Review of crash effectiveness of intelligent transport systems , 2007 .

[9]  Richard Frampton,et al.  An evaluation of the EuroNCAP crash test safety ratings in the real world. , 2007, Annual proceedings. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine.

[10]  L Evans,et al.  Airbag effectiveness in preventing fatalities predicted according to type of crash, driver age, and blood alcohol concentration. , 1989, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[11]  Francisco J Lopez-Valdes,et al.  Real-world performance of vehicle crash test: the case of EuroNCAP , 2010, Injury Prevention.

[12]  Matthew P. Reed,et al.  Focusing on Vulnerable Populations in Crashes: Recent Advances in Finite Element Human Models for Injury Biomechanics Research , 2012 .

[13]  Karin Brolin,et al.  A Human Body Model With Active Muscles for Simulation of Pretensioned Restraints in Autonomous Braking Interventions , 2015, Traffic injury prevention.

[14]  A. Kullgren,et al.  Injury risk functions in frontal impacts using data from crash pulse recorders. , 2012, Annals of advances in automotive medicine. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine. Annual Scientific Conference.

[15]  Joseph M. Tonning,et al.  Fatality reduction by safety belts for front-seat occupants of cars and light trucks. , 2001, Annals of emergency medicine.

[16]  Carol A C Flannagan,et al.  Identification and validation of a logistic regression model for predicting serious injuries associated with motor vehicle crashes. , 2011, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[17]  Jun Wu,et al.  Optimizing the Rear Seat Environment for Older Children, Adults, and Infants , 2013, Traffic injury prevention.

[18]  Charles M Farmer,et al.  Relationships of Frontal Offset Crash Test Results to Real-World Driver Fatality Rates , 2005, Traffic injury prevention.

[19]  Jun Wu,et al.  Rear Seat Restraint System Optimization for Older Children in Frontal Crashes , 2013, Traffic injury prevention.

[20]  Uwe Class,et al.  Analysis of the Pre-Crash Benefit of Reversible Belt Pre-Pretensioning in Different Accident Scenarios , 2011 .

[21]  Gabriel E Ryb,et al.  Crash test ratings and real-world frontal crash outcomes: a CIREN study. , 2010, The Journal of trauma.

[22]  Costin D. Untaroiu,et al.  Occupant classification for an adaptive restraint system: The methodology and benefits in terms of injury reduction , 2012 .

[23]  Neil D. Lerner,et al.  Brake Perception-Reaction Times of Older and Younger Drivers , 1993 .

[24]  Carol A.C. Flannagan.  A method for estimating delta-V distributions from injury outcomes in crashes , 2013 .

[25]  Yulong Wang,et al.  A Simulation Study on the Efficacy of Advanced Belt Restraints to Mitigate the Effects of Obesity for Rear-Seat Occupant Protection in Frontal Crashes , 2015, Traffic injury prevention.

[26]  Costin D. Untaroiu,et al.  Identification of occupant posture using a Bayesian classification methodology to reduce the risk of injury in a collision , 2011 .

[27]  Joel D Stitzel,et al.  Age- and Sex-Specific Thorax Finite Element Model Development and Simulation , 2015, Traffic injury prevention.

[28]  Michael Fehring,et al.  PRE-SAFE Impulse - Early Interacting Occupant Restraint System , 2013 .

[29]  Hisao Ito,et al.  Assessment of a Pre-Crash Seatbelt Technology in Frontal Impacts by Using a New Crash Test Sled System with Controllable Pre-Impact Braking , 2013 .

[30]  Kristofer D. Kusano,et al.  Potential Occupant Injury Reduction in Pre-Crash System Equipped Vehicles in the Striking Vehicle of Rear-end Crashes. , 2010, Annals of advances in automotive medicine. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine. Annual Scientific Conference.

[31]  D. Bose,et al.  Influence of pre-collision occupant parameters on injury outcome in a frontal collision. , 2010, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[32]  Edwin van Hassel,et al.  Evaluation of an Active Multi-Body Human Model for Braking and Frontal Crash Events , 2013 .