The detection of infant cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs) using statistical and visual detection techniques.

BACKGROUND With the advent of newborn hearing screening programs, the need to verify the fit of hearing aids in young infants has increased. The recording of cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs) for this purpose is quite feasible, but rapid developmental changes that affect response morphology and the presence of electrophysiological noise can make subjective response detection challenging. PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of an automated statistic versus experienced examiners in detecting the presence of infant CAEPs when stimuli were present and reporting the absence of CAEPs when no stimuli were present. RESEARCH DESIGN A repeated-measures design was used where infant-generated CAEPs were interpreted by examiners and an automated statistic. STUDY SAMPLE There were nine male and five female infants (mean age, 12 mo; SD, 3.4) who completed behavioral and electrophysiological testing using speech-based stimuli. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS In total, 87 infant CAEPs were recorded to three sensation levels, 10, 20 and 30 dB relative to the behavioral thresholds and to nonstimulus trials. Three examiners were presented with these responses: (1) "in series," where waveforms were presented in order of decreasing stimulus presentation levels, and (2) "nonseries," where waveforms were randomized completely and presented as independent waveforms. The examiners were given no information about the stimulus levels and were asked to determine whether responses to auditory stimulation could be observed and their degree of certainty in making their decision. Data from the CAEP responses were also converted to multiple dependent variables and analyzed using Hotelling's T(2). Results from both methods of response detection were analyzed using a repeated measures ANOVA (analysis of variance) and parameters of signal detection theory known as d-prime (d') and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. RESULTS Results showed that as the stimulus level increased, the sensitivity index, d', increased for both methods of response detection, but neither reached the maximum possible d' value with a sensation level of 30 dB. The examiners with the greatest experience and Hotelling's T(2) were equally sensitive in differentiating the CAEP from noise. CONCLUSIONS Hotelling's T(2) appears to detect CAEPs from normal hearing infants at a rate equal to that of an experienced examiner. A clinical instrument that applies Hotelling's T(2) on-line, so that the likelihood of response detection can be assessed objectively, should be of particular benefit to the novice or less experienced examiner.

[1]  G. Stoelinga,et al.  The central auditory conduction at term date and three months after birth. III. Middle latency responses (MLRs). , 1986, Scandinavian audiology.

[2]  Herbert G. Vaughan,et al.  Early identification of infants with developmental disabilities , 1988 .

[3]  B. Cone-Wesson,et al.  Effects of stimulus level on cortical auditory event-related potentials evoked by speech. , 2007, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[4]  M. Zweig,et al.  Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine. , 1993, Clinical chemistry.

[5]  J. Hanley,et al.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. , 1982, Radiology.

[6]  L. Graziani,et al.  Auditory‐evoked responses in normal, brain‐damaged, and deaf infants , 1967, Neurology.

[7]  Hallowell Davis,et al.  Slow Cortical Responses Evoked by Acoustic Stimuli , 1965 .

[8]  Harvey Dillon,et al.  Cortical auditory evoked potentials in the assessment of auditory neuropathy: two case studies. , 2007, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[9]  N. Kraus,et al.  Speech Sound Representation, Perception, and Plasticity: A Neurophysiologic Perspective , 1998, Audiology and Neurotology.

[10]  J. Wunderlich,et al.  Auditory evoked potentials from the cortex: audiology applications , 2003, Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery.

[11]  P. Kileny,et al.  Auditory Brainstem Responses as Indicators of Hearing Aid Performance , 1982, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[12]  Gary Rance,et al.  Speech Perception and Cortical Event Related Potentials in Children with Auditory Neuropathy , 2002, Ear and hearing.

[13]  Andrea S. Kelly,et al.  Cortical auditory evoked potential testing in infants and young children , 2001 .

[14]  Jos J. Eggermont,et al.  Auditory-evoked Potential Studies of Cortical Maturation in Normal Hearing and Implanted Children: Correlations with Changes in Structure and Speech Perception , 2003, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[15]  Sheila Moodie,et al.  Clinical Protocols for Hearing Instrument Fitting in the Desired Sensation Level Method , 2005, Trends in amplification.

[16]  A. J. Klein,et al.  Hearing-aid-processed tone pips: electroacoustic and ABR characteristics. , 1999, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[17]  K. Sirimanna Management of the hearing impaired infant. , 2001, Seminars in neonatology : SN.

[18]  Larry E. Humes,et al.  Audiology: The Fundamentals , 1990 .

[19]  Harvey Dillon,et al.  Aided Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials for Hearing Instrument Evaluation in Infants , 2005 .

[20]  M. Primus Repeated infant thresholds in operant and nonoperant audiometric procedures. , 1991, Ear and hearing.

[21]  Harvey Dillon,et al.  The relationship between obligatory cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs) and functional measures in young infants. , 2007, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[22]  R. Shepherd,et al.  Clinical findings for a group of infants and young children with auditory neuropathy. , 1999, Ear and hearing.

[23]  D. Markle,et al.  Hearing Aids , 1936, The Journal of Laryngology & Otology.

[24]  James W. Hall Handbook of Auditory Evoked Responses , 1991 .

[25]  M. Dorman,et al.  A Sensitive Period for the Development of the Central Auditory System in Children with Cochlear Implants: Implications for Age of Implantation , 2002, Ear and hearing.

[26]  Diane Kurtzberg,et al.  Effects of Sensorineural Hearing Loss and Personal Hearing Aids on Cortical Event-Related Potential and Behavioral Measures of Speech-Sound Processing , 2005, Ear and hearing.

[27]  John Greer Clark,et al.  Introduction to Audiology , 1975 .

[28]  Don McNicol,et al.  A Primer of Signal Detection Theory , 1976 .

[29]  Bernhard N Flury Multivariate Statistics: A Practical Approach , 1988 .

[30]  M. Shinomiya Auditory-evoked potentials in senile dementia , 1990 .

[31]  Diane Kurtzberg,et al.  Effects of Sensorineural Hearing Loss on Cortical Event-Related Potential and Behavioral Measures of Speech-Sound Processing , 2002, Ear and hearing.

[32]  R. Näätänen,et al.  Maturation of the auditory event-related potentials during the first year of life , 2002, Neuroreport.

[33]  J. Wunderlich,et al.  Maturation of CAEP in infants and children: A review , 2006, Hearing Research.

[34]  G. Lightfoot,et al.  Cortical Electric Response Audiometry Hearing Threshold Estimation: Accuracy, Speed, and the Effects of Stimulus Presentation Features , 2006, Ear and hearing.

[35]  T. Nicol,et al.  Speech-Evoked Neurophysiologic Responses in Children with Learning Problems: Development and Behavioral Correlates of Perception , 2000, Ear and hearing.

[36]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using Multivariate Statistics , 1983 .

[37]  M. Hyde,et al.  The N1 response and its applications. , 1997, Audiology & neuro-otology.

[38]  J E Widen,et al.  Adding Objectivity to Infant Behavioral Audiometry , 1993, Ear and hearing.

[39]  T W Picton,et al.  Objective evaluation of aided thresholds using auditory steady-state responses. , 1998, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[40]  R. Hellman,et al.  Loudness relations for individuals and groups in normal and impaired hearing. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[41]  Y. Sininger Identification of Auditory Neuropathy in Infants and Children , 2002 .

[42]  H. Riedwyl,et al.  Multivariate Statistics: A Practical Approach , 1988 .

[43]  D. Kurtzberg,et al.  Evoked potential assessment of auditory system integrity in infants. , 1991, Clinics in perinatology.

[44]  K. Graydon,et al.  A comparison of 40 Hz auditory steady-state response (ASSR) and cortical auditory evoked potential (CAEP) thresholds in awake adult subjects , 2006, International journal of audiology.

[45]  Harvey Dillon,et al.  The detection of adult cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs) using an automated statistic and visual detection , 2009, International journal of audiology.

[46]  B. Maassen,et al.  The maturation of auditory cortical evoked responses between (preterm) birth and 14 years of age. , 1999, European journal of paediatric neurology : EJPN : official journal of the European Paediatric Neurology Society.

[47]  T. Ching,et al.  The Parents' Evaluation of Aural/Oral Performance of Children (PEACH) scale: normative data. , 2007, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.