Quantification of carbon emission of construction waste by using streamlined LCA: a case study of Shenzhen, China

Currently, the majority of the construction waste (CW) has been collected without classification and simply disposed in China. To quantify the environmental impacts and provide reasonable policy recommendations, this paper conducted an assessment for the life cycle carbon emissions (CEs) for CW based on a streamlined life cycle assessment method. Three typical CW management approaches in Shenzhen City were selected to perform the case study and comparative analysis. The results show that scenario I with low recycling rate generates the largest CEs amount by 542.56 kg for 1 ton CW, followed by scenarios II and scenario III that generate 538.61 and 483.85 kg, respectively. In addition, the results show the material embody impact is the largest contributor to CEs for CW examined, accounting for 78 % of the total amount in the overall life cycle. Analysis results also show that wood, steel and concrete wastes are the top three contributors within nine materials, with proportions of 25, 23 and 13 %, respectively. Therefore, the most effective way to decrease the CEs of CW is minimizing the generation of CW, since the CEs of the majority of waste are not sensitive to alteration of treatment methods or recycling rate.

[1]  Giovanni Andrea Blengini,et al.  Life cycle of buildings, demolition and recycling potential: A case study in Turin, Italy , 2009 .

[2]  Gabriela Benveniste,et al.  Simplified tools for global warming potential evaluation: when ‘good enough’ is best , 2010 .

[3]  Javier R. Viguri,et al.  Estimation of Construction and Demolition Waste (C&DW) Generation and Multicriteria Analysis of C&DW Management Alternatives: A Case Study in Spain , 2011 .

[4]  Randolph Kirchain,et al.  Exploring the viability of probabilistic under-specification to streamline life cycle assessment. , 2013, Environmental science & technology.

[5]  Valeria Ibáñez-Forés,et al.  Life cycle assessment of construction and demolition waste management systems: a Spanish case study , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[6]  Jiayuan Wang,et al.  A model for estimating construction waste generation index for building project in China , 2013 .

[7]  Giovanni Andrea Blengini,et al.  The changing role of life cycle phases, subsystems and materials in the LCA of low energy buildings , 2010 .

[8]  Rehan Sadiq,et al.  An overview of construction and demolition waste management in Canada: a lifecycle analysis approach to sustainability , 2013, Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy.

[9]  Charles J. Kibert,et al.  Strategies for successful construction and demolition waste recycling operations , 1997 .

[10]  Weisheng Lu,et al.  An empirical investigation of construction and demolition waste generation rates in Shenzhen city, South China. , 2011, Waste management.

[11]  Nilay Cosgun,et al.  A study conducted to reduce construction waste generation in Turkey , 2007 .

[12]  Per Levin,et al.  Environmental assessment of rebuilding and possible performance improvements effect on a national scale , 2004 .

[13]  Shabbir H Gheewala,et al.  Estimation of construction waste generation and management in Thailand. , 2009, Waste management.

[14]  Vivian W. Y Tam,et al.  An investigation of construction wastes: an empirical study in Shenzhen , 2008 .

[15]  Murat Kucukvar,et al.  Evaluating environmental impacts of alternative construction waste management approaches using supply-chain-linked life-cycle analysis , 2014, Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA.

[16]  O Ortiz,et al.  Environmental performance of construction waste: Comparing three scenarios from a case study in Catalonia, Spain. , 2010, Waste management.

[17]  Parnuwat Usapein,et al.  Evaluating the performance of 3R options to reduce landfill wastes using the 3R indicator (3RI): case study of polyethylene factories in Thailand , 2015 .