Vegetation characteristics and underlying topography from interferometric radar

This paper formulates and demonstrates methods for extracting vegetation characteristics and underlying ground surface topography from interferometric synthetic aperture radar (INSAR) data. The electromagnetic scattering and radar processing, which produce the INSAR observations, are modeled, vegetation and topographic parameters are identified for estimation, the parameter errors are assessed in terms of INSAR instrumental performance, and the parameter estimation is demonstrated on INSAR data and compared to ground truth. The fundamental observations from which vegetation and surface topographic parameters are estimated are (1) the cross-correlation amplitude, (2) the cross-correlation phase, and (3) the synthetic aperture radar (SAR) backscattered power. A calculation based on scattering from vegetation treated as a random medium, including the effects of refractivity and absorption in the vegetation, yields expressions for the complex cross correlation and backscattered power in terms of vegetation characteristics. These expressions lead to the identification of a minimal set of four parameters describing the vegetation and surface topography: (1) the vegetation layer depth, (2) the vegetation extinction coefficient (power loss per unit length), (3) a parameter involving the product of the average backscattering amplitude and scatterer number density, and (4) the height of the underlying ground surface. The accuracy of vegetation and ground surface parameters, as a function of INSAR observation accuracy, is evaluated for aircraft INSAR, which is characterized by a 2.5-m baseline, an altitude of about 8 km, and a wavelength of 5.6 cm. It is found that for ≈0.5% accuracy in the INSAR normalized cross-correlation amplitude and ≈5° accuracy in the interferometric phase, few-meter vegetation layer depths and ground surface heights can be determined from INSAR for many types of vegetation layers. With the same observational accuracies, extinction coefficients can be estimated at the 0.1-dB/m level. Because the number of parameters exceeds the number of observations for current INSAR data sets, external extinction coefficient data are used to demonstrate the estimation of the vegetation layer depth and ground surface height from INSAR data taken at the Bonanza Creek Experimental Forest in Alaska. This demonstration shows approximately 5-m average ground truth agreement for vegetation layer depths and ground-surface heights, with a clear dependence of error on stand height. These errors suggest refinements in INSAR data acquisition and analysis techniques which will potentially yield few-meter accuracies. The information in the INSAR parameters is applicable to a variety of ecological modeling issues including the successional modeling of forested ecosystems.

[1]  L. Foldy,et al.  The Multiple Scattering of Waves. I. General Theory of Isotropic Scattering by Randomly Distributed Scatterers , 1945 .

[2]  M. Lax Multiple Scattering of Waves , 1951 .

[3]  L. C. Graham,et al.  Synthetic interferometer radar for topographic mapping , 1974 .

[4]  Fawwaz Ulaby,et al.  A Scatter Model for Leafy Vegetation , 1978, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience Electronics.

[5]  Roger H. Lang,et al.  Electromagnetic backscattering from a sparse distribution of lossy dielectric scatterers , 1981 .

[6]  J. Vesecky,et al.  Wave propagation and scattering. , 1989 .

[7]  Richard M. Goldstein,et al.  Studies of multibaseline spaceborne interferometric synthetic aperture radars , 1990 .

[8]  John A. Richards,et al.  The effect of changing environmental conditions on microwave signatures of forest ecosystems - Preliminary results of the March 1988 Alaskan aircraft SAR experiment , 1990 .

[9]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  Helicopter-borne measurements of radar backscatter from forests. , 1990 .

[10]  Giovanni Alberti,et al.  The TOPSAR interferometric radar topographic mapping instrument , 1992, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[11]  E. Rodríguez,et al.  Theory and design of interferometric synthetic aperture radars , 1992 .

[12]  Jakob J. van Zyl,et al.  The effect of topography on radar scattering from vegetated areas , 1992, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[13]  JoBea Way,et al.  Radar estimates of aboveground biomass in boreal forests of interior Alaska , 1994, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[14]  Søren Nørvang Madsen,et al.  The Accuracy of Airborne Interferometric SAR's , 1994 .

[15]  Søren Nørvang Madsen,et al.  Analysis and evaluation of the NASA/JPL TOPSAR across-track interferometric SAR system , 1995 .

[16]  Lars M. H. Ulander,et al.  Repeat-pass SAR interferometry over forested terrain , 1995 .

[17]  D. Harding,et al.  Estimation of Penetration of Forest Canopies by Interferometric SAR Measurements , 1995 .

[18]  R. Neilson A Model for Predicting Continental‐Scale Vegetation Distribution and Water Balance , 1995 .