Three-Dimensional Wiring for Extensible Quantum Computing: The Quantum Socket

Quantum computing architectures are on the verge of scalability, a key requirement for the implementation of a universal quantum computer. The next stage in this quest is the realization of quantum error-correction codes, which will mitigate the impact of faulty quantum information on a quantum computer. Architectures with ten or more quantum bits (qubits) have been realized using trapped ions and superconducting circuits. While these implementations are potentially scalable, true scalability will require systems engineering to combine quantum and classical hardware. One technology demanding imminent efforts is the realization of a suitable wiring method for the control and the measurement of a large number of qubits. In this work, we introduce an interconnect solution for solid-state qubits: the quantum socket. The quantum socket fully exploits the third dimension to connect classical electronics to qubits with higher density and better performance than two-dimensional methods based on wire bonding. The quantum socket is based on spring-mounted microwires-the three-dimensional wires-that push directly on a microfabricated chip, making electrical contact. A small wire cross section (approximately 1 mm), nearly nonmagnetic components, and functionality at low temperatures make the quantum socket ideal for operating solid-state qubits. The wires have a coaxial geometry and operate over a frequency range from dc to 8 GHz, with a contact resistance of approximately 150 m Omega, an impedance mismatch of approximately 10 Omega, and minimal cross talk. As a proof of principle, we fabricate and use a quantum socket to measure high-quality superconducting resonators at a temperature of approximately 10 mK. Quantum error-correction codes such as the surface code will largely benefit from the quantum socket, which will make it possible to address qubits located on a two-dimensional lattice. The present implementation of the socket could be readily extended to accommodate a quantum processor with a (10 x 10)-qubit lattice, which would allow for the realization of a simple quantum memory.

[1]  O A Mukhanov,et al.  Energy-Efficient Single Flux Quantum Technology , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.

[2]  Robert Raussendorf,et al.  Fault-tolerant quantum computation with high threshold in two dimensions. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[3]  John M. Martinis,et al.  Qubit metrology for building a fault-tolerant quantum computer , 2015, npj Quantum Information.

[4]  S. Poletto,et al.  Detecting bit-flip errors in a logical qubit using stabilizer measurements , 2014, Nature Communications.

[5]  R. Barends,et al.  Coherent Josephson qubit suitable for scalable quantum integrated circuits. , 2013, Physical review letters.

[6]  J. Martinis,et al.  Microwave response of vortices in superconducting thin films of Re and Al , 2008, 0812.3645.

[7]  P. Duthil,et al.  Material Properties at Low Temperature , 2015, 1501.07100.

[8]  M. Mariantoni,et al.  Growth and characterization of epitaxial aluminum layers on gallium-arsenide substrates for superconducting quantum bits , 2016 .

[9]  Pieter Kok,et al.  Quantum computers: Definition and implementations , 2011 .

[10]  John M. Martinis,et al.  State preservation by repetitive error detection in a superconducting quantum circuit , 2015, Nature.

[11]  E. K. Track,et al.  Superconductor ICs: the 100-GHz second generation , 2000 .

[12]  Michel Devoret,et al.  Superconducting quantum bits , 2005 .

[13]  M. Mariantoni,et al.  Planck spectroscopy and quantum noise of microwave beam splitters. , 2010, Physical review letters.

[14]  C. A. Swenson Recommended Values for the Thermal Expansivity of Silicon from 0 to 1000 K , 1983 .

[15]  L. Vandersypen,et al.  Spins in few-electron quantum dots , 2006, cond-mat/0610433.

[16]  G. Milburn,et al.  Linear optical quantum computing with photonic qubits , 2005, quant-ph/0512071.

[17]  Adele E. Schmitz,et al.  Coherent singlet-triplet oscillations in a silicon-based double quantum dot , 2012, Nature.

[18]  Austin G. Fowler,et al.  Quantifying the effects of local many-qubit errors and nonlocal two-qubit errors on the surface code , 2014 .

[19]  E. Lucero,et al.  Planar Superconducting Resonators with Internal Quality Factors above One Million , 2012, 1201.3384.

[20]  Thierry Paul,et al.  Quantum computation and quantum information , 2007, Mathematical Structures in Computer Science.

[21]  M. Mariantoni,et al.  Two-resonator circuit quantum electrodynamics : A superconducting quantum switch , 2007, 0712.2522.

[22]  F. Pobell,et al.  Superconducting aluminum heat switch and plated press-contacts for use at ultralow temperatures. , 1978, The Review of scientific instruments.

[23]  Erik Lucero,et al.  Wirebond crosstalk and cavity modes in large chip mounts for superconducting qubits , 2010, 1011.4982.

[24]  R. Barends,et al.  Superconducting quantum circuits at the surface code threshold for fault tolerance , 2014, Nature.

[25]  Joe O'Gorman,et al.  A silicon-based surface code quantum computer , 2014, npj Quantum Information.

[26]  Enrique Solano,et al.  Resonant quantum gates in circuit quantum electrodynamics , 2010 .

[27]  C. Monroe,et al.  Scaling the Ion Trap Quantum Processor , 2013, Science.

[28]  D. Deutsch Quantum theory, the Church–Turing principle and the universal quantum computer , 1985, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[29]  Ashley Montanaro,et al.  Quantum algorithms: an overview , 2015, npj Quantum Information.

[30]  R. J. Schoelkopf,et al.  Multilayer microwave integrated quantum circuits for scalable quantum computing , 2015, npj Quantum Information.

[31]  B. Plourde,et al.  Reducing microwave loss in superconducting resonators due to trapped vortices , 2009, 0911.3131.

[32]  M. Mariantoni,et al.  Surface codes: Towards practical large-scale quantum computation , 2012, 1208.0928.

[33]  R. J. Schoelkopf,et al.  Demonstration of superconducting micromachined cavities , 2015, 1509.01119.

[34]  Erik Lucero,et al.  Minimizing quasiparticle generation from stray infrared light in superconducting quantum circuits , 2011 .

[35]  H. S. Allen The Quantum Theory , 1928, Nature.

[36]  Igor V. Vernik,et al.  Modular, Multi-Function Digital-RF Receiver Systems , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.

[37]  Antonio Corcoles,et al.  Protecting superconducting qubits from radiation , 2011 .

[38]  R. Schoelkopf,et al.  Superconducting Circuits for Quantum Information: An Outlook , 2013, Science.

[39]  Erik Lucero,et al.  Implementing the Quantum von Neumann Architecture with Superconducting Circuits , 2011, Science.

[40]  D. Gottesman An Introduction to Quantum Error Correction and Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computation , 2009, 0904.2557.

[41]  A. Gossard,et al.  Coherent operations and screening in multielectron spin qubits. , 2013, Physical review letters.

[42]  Andrew W. Cross,et al.  Demonstration of a quantum error detection code using a square lattice of four superconducting qubits , 2015, Nature Communications.

[43]  A. Wallraff,et al.  Fabrication and characterization of superconducting circuit QED devices for quantum computation , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.

[44]  D. DiVincenzo,et al.  The Physical Implementation of Quantum Computation , 2000, quant-ph/0002077.

[45]  Zijun Chen,et al.  Strong environmental coupling in a Josephson parametric amplifier , 2014, 1401.3799.

[46]  R. Simons Coplanar waveguide circuits, components, and systems , 2001 .