The dimensionality of the convenience phenomenon: A qualitative reexamination

Empirical investigations that have adhered to a unidimensional, time-oriented conceptualization of convenience have often yielded weak findings. This research explains 1) the rationale for and 2) the results of a study that qualitatively reexamines the convenience phenomenon. Diary responses are used to develop and test a reconceptualization of convenience that includes temporal, spatial, and effort dimensions. The dimensions are shown to reliably elaborate upon the unidimensional conceptualization. Implications of the three-dimensional scheme are explained. Other managerial implications of the findings are delineated; among them, the study reveals that, contrary to popular wisdom, convenient products can be dissatisfying. This relates to instances in which the choice of a convenient product entails a tradeoff of environmental or nutritional concerns. Consequently, companies must strive to develop convenient products which do not force consumers to compromise environmental, nutritional, and other concerns.

[1]  J. C. Flanagan.  Psychological Bulletin THE CRITICAL INCIDENT TECHNIQUE , 2022 .

[2]  G. Stigler.  The Economics of Information , 1961, Journal of Political Economy.

[3]  Julie L. Ozanne,et al.  Alternative Ways of Seeking Knowledge in Consumer Research , 1988 .

[4]  S. Douglas,et al.  Cross-National Comparisons and Consumer Stereotypes: A Case Study of Working and Non-Working Wives in the U.S. and France , 1976 .

[5]  C. P. Rao,et al.  Food Shopping and Preparation: Psychographic Differences of Working Wives and Housewives , 1985 .

[6]  E. Hirschman,et al.  The Experiential Aspects of Consumption: Consumer Fantasies, Feelings, and Fun , 1982 .

[7]  Charles B. Weinberg,et al.  Working Wives and Major Family Expenditures , 1977 .

[8]  C. Allen,et al.  Wife's Occupational Status as a Consumer Behavior Construct , 1981 .

[9]  Charles B. Weinberg,et al.  Strategies Used by Working and Nonworking Wives to Reduce Time Pressures , 1980 .

[10]  R. Belk.  Art Versus Science as Ways of Generating Knowledge About Materialism , 1966 .

[11]  Alladi Venkatesh,et al.  Toward the Construct of Convenience in Consumer Research , 1986 .

[12]  William J. Havlena,et al.  The Varieties of Consumption Experience: Comparing Two Typologies of Emotion in Consumer Behavior , 1986 .

[13]  Richard H. Holton,et al.  The Distinction between Convenience Goods, Shopping Goods, and Specialty Goods , 1958 .

[14]  J. Jacoby,et al.  Time and Consumer Behavior: An Interdisciplinary Overview , 1976 .

[15]  Alice M. Tybout,et al.  What Consumer Research Is , 1987 .

[16]  Dennis W. Rook.  The Buying Impulse , 1987 .

[17]  W. Anderson,et al.  Identifying the Convenience-Oriented Consumer , 1971 .

[18]  Gary S. Becker,et al.  ON THE NEW THEORY OF CONSUMER BEHAVIOR , 1973 .

[19]  Michael D. Reilly.  Working Wives and Convenience Consumption , 1982 .

[20]  L. Shrum,et al.  Tipping As a Consumer Behavior: a Qualitative Investigation , 1990 .

[21]  M. Wolfinbarger.  Motivations and Symbolism in Gift-Giving Behavior , 1990 .

[22]  H. H. Kassarjian.  Content Analysis in Consumer Research , 1977 .

[23]  G. Becker,et al.  A Theory of the Allocation of Time , 1965 .

[24]  E. Hirschman,et al.  Hedonic Consumption: Emerging Concepts, Methods and Propositions , 1982 .

[25]  Dorothy Leonard-Barton,et al.  Voluntary Simplicity Lifestyles and Energy Conservation , 1981 .

[26]  A. Strauss,et al.  The Discovery of Grounded Theory , 1967 .