Understanding user requirements and preferences for a digital library Web portal

This article reports the findings of a user study conducted in the context of the TELplus project to gain insights about user needs and preferences for the digital library services offered by The European Library Web portal. The user requirements collection for the Web portal was designed by adopting a comprehensive survey approach. This combined explicit user feedback with implicit usage data so as to provide a more in-depth analysis of user experience with the portal. The analysis conducted shed light on likely motivations for both participant usage and reluctance to use the services provided, leading to more informed decisions on how to refine, improve, and present Web portal services to their future users. The lessons learnt from this case study also contributed to the development of an integrated methodological framework which provided insights for the future design and evaluation of digital library Web portals and services.

[1]  Daniel M. Russell,et al.  Query logs alone are not enough , 2007 .

[2]  Koraljka Golub,et al.  Browsing and searching behavior in the renardus web service a study based on log analysis , 2004, JCDL.

[3]  Maristella Agosti Log Data in Digital Libraries , 2008, IRCDL.

[4]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Beyond the user: use and non-use in HCI , 2009, OZCHI.

[5]  Carol Peters,et al.  Evaluation of digital libraries , 2007, International Journal on Digital Libraries.

[6]  Christine L. Borgman From Gutenberg to the Global Information Infrastructure , 2000 .

[7]  James Frew,et al.  User Evaluation: Summary of the Methodologies and Results for the Alexandria Digital Library, University of California at Santa Barbara , 1997 .

[8]  Katharina Reinecke,et al.  How can we support users' preferential choice? , 2011, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[9]  Giorgio Maria Di Nunzio,et al.  Gathering and Mining Information from Web Log Files , 2007, DELOS.

[10]  Giorgio Maria Di Nunzio,et al.  Web Log Mining : A Study of User Sessions , 2007 .

[11]  Sally Jo Cunningham,et al.  A Comparative Transaction Log Analysis of Two Computing Collections , 2000, ECDL.

[12]  Diane Kelly,et al.  Questionnaire mode effects in interactive information retrieval experiments , 2008, Inf. Process. Manag..

[13]  Kalervo Järvelin,et al.  The SST method: a tool for analysing Web information search processes , 2004, Inf. Process. Manag..

[14]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Usability engineering , 1997, The Computer Science and Engineering Handbook.

[15]  Bich-Liên Doan,et al.  Workshop on Contextual Information Access, Seeking and Retrieval Evaluation , 2009, ECIR.

[16]  Giannis Tsakonas,et al.  Evaluation of digital libraries : an insight to useful applications and methods , 2009 .

[17]  Thomas Beauvisage,et al.  Users and Uses of Online Digital Libraries in France , 2003, ECDL.

[18]  David Nicholas,et al.  Scholarly journal usage: the results of deep log analysis , 2005, J. Documentation.

[19]  Johan Bollen,et al.  Evaluation of Digital Library Impact and User Communities by Analysis of Usage Patterns , 2002, D Lib Mag..

[20]  Jaime Teevan,et al.  Information re-retrieval: repeat queries in Yahoo's logs , 2007, SIGIR.

[21]  Florian König,et al.  Assessing the Effectiveness and Usability of Personalized Internet Search through a Longitudinal Evaluation , 2009 .

[22]  Giorgio Maria Di Nunzio,et al.  Multilingual Log Analysis: LogCLEF , 2011, ECIR.

[23]  Peter G. Anick Using terminological feedback for web search refinement: a log-based study , 2003, SIGIR.

[24]  Elaina Norlin Reference Evaluation: A Three-Step Approach—Surveys, Unobtrusive Observations, and Focus Groups , 2000 .

[25]  Giorgio Maria Di Nunzio,et al.  Analysing HTTP Logs of a European DL Initiative to Maximize Usage and Usability , 2007, ICADL.

[26]  Lynn Lampert Usability Testing for Library Websites: A Hands-On Guide, and: Don't Make Me Think!: A Common Sense Approach to Web Usability (review) , 2002 .

[27]  Leland Wilkinson,et al.  Revising the Pareto Chart , 2006 .