Information Technology Platforms: Conceptualisation and a Review of Emerging Research in the IS Discipline

The concept of an information technology (IT) related “platform” is broad and covers phenomena ranging from the operating system Linux to the Internet. Such platforms are of increasing importance to innovation and value creation across many facets of industry and daily life. There is, however, a lack of common understanding in both research and industry about what is mean by the term “platform” when related to IT. This lack of consensus is detrimental to research and knowledge development. Thus, the aims of this study are to: (i) conceptualise an IT-platform by identifying its distinguishing dimensions and show the concept’s extension to ecosystems; and (ii) identify important current research directions for the IT-platform concept. To achieve these aims a systematic literature review was undertaken with 132 relevant articles taken from major information systems journals, conferences, and business publications. The study contributes by providing a sound base for future research into IT-platforms.

[1]  Rajiv M. Dewan,et al.  The Disruptive Effect of Open Platforms on Markets for Wireless Services , 2010 .

[2]  Rahul C. Basole.  Structural Analysis and Visualization of Ecosystems: A Study of Mobile Device Platforms , 2009, AMCIS.

[3]  Janis L. Gogan,et al.  Managing the Internet Payment Platform project , 2007, J. Inf. Technol..

[4]  B. Berg.  Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences , 1989 .

[5]  R. Bagozzi.  A Prospectus for Theory Construction in Marketing , 1984 .

[6]  Rüdiger Zarnekow,et al.  Evaluating Platform Business Models in the Telecommunications Industry via Framework-based Case Studies of Cloud and Smart Home Service Platforms , 2014, Americas Conference on Information Systems.

[7]  Amrit Tiwana,et al.  Evolutionary Competition in Platform Ecosystems , 2015, Inf. Syst. Res..

[8]  Ravi Mantena,et al.  Co-opetition Between Differentiated Platforms in Two-Sided Markets , 2012, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[9]  D. Shepherd,et al.  Theory Building , 2017 .

[10]  Katja Hutter,et al.  Virtual worlds as knowledge management platform – a practice‐perspective , 2011, Inf. Syst. J..

[11]  Melissa A. Schilling.  Toward a General Modular Systems Theory and Its Application to Interfirm Product Modularity , 2000 .

[12]  Nils Walravens.  The City as a Service Platform: A Typology of City Platform Roles in Mobile Service Provision , 2013, AMCIS.

[13]  Mei Li,et al.  Investigating Developers' entry to Mobile App Platforms: a Network Externality View , 2014, ECIS.

[14]  Robert G. Fichman,et al.  Real Options and IT Platform Adoption: Implications for Theory and Practice , 2004, Inf. Syst. Res..

[15]  B. Glaser.  Conceptualization: On Theory and Theorizing Using Grounded Theory , 2002 .

[16]  Mark Fichman,et al.  Multihoming Users' Preferences for Two-Sided Exchange Networks , 2014, MIS Q..

[17]  Erwin Fielt,et al.  Exploring Shared Services from an IS Perspective: A Literature Review and Research Agenda , 2014, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[18]  H. Zimmermann,et al.  OSI Reference Model - The ISO Model of Architecture for Open Systems Interconnection , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[19]  Lili Yang,et al.  Design Principles of Integrated Information Platform for Emergency Responses: The Case of 2008 Beijing Olympic Games , 2012, Inf. Syst. Res..

[20]  Ted Saarikko,et al.  Digital platform development: A service-oriented perspective , 2015, ECIS.

[21]  Chitu Okoli,et al.  A Guide to Conducting a Systematic Literature Review of Information Systems Research , 2010 .

[22]  Alfred Taudes,et al.  Options Analysis of Software Platform Decisions: A Case Study , 2000, MIS Q..

[23]  Rudy Hirschheim,et al.  An extended platform logic perspective of IT governance: managing perceptions and activities of IT , 2003, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[24]  Edward G. Anderson,et al.  Platform Performance Investment in the Presence of Network Externalities , 2013, Inf. Syst. Res..

[25]  Oliver Hinz,et al.  Return on IT Investments in Two-Sided Markets , 2010 .

[26]  Sebastian K. Boell,et al.  On being ‘systematic’ in literature reviews in IS , 2015, J. Inf. Technol..

[27]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Ebook: Qualitative data analysis , 2013 .

[28]  Chris Maurer,et al.  Control in App Platforms: The Integration-Differentiation Paradox , 2012, ICIS.

[29]  Yair Wand,et al.  Extending Classification Principles from Information Modeling to Other Disciplines , 2013, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[30]  Peter G. W. Keen,et al.  Value architectures for digital business: beyond the business model , 2013 .

[31]  Claudia Loebbecke,et al.  Commoditized digital processes and business community platforms: new opportunities and challenges for digital business strategies , 2013 .

[32]  Boyan Jovanovic,et al.  General Purpose Technologies , 2005 .

[33]  John J. Sviokla,et al.  Every Product's a Platform , 2005 .

[34]  D. Whetten.  What Constitutes a Theoretical Contribution , 1989 .

[35]  Erwin Fielt,et al.  European Conference on Information Systems ( ECIS ) Summer 10-6-2011 A SYSTEMATIC , TOOL-SUPPORTED METHOD FOR CONDUCTING LITERATURE REVIEWS IN INFORMATION SYSTEMS , 2017 .

[36]  Vasant Dhar,et al.  Issues and Opinions - Information Technologies in Business: A Blueprint for Education and Research , 2007, Inf. Syst. Res..

[37]  Alexander Benlian,et al.  Mobile Application Quality and Platform Stickiness under Formal vs. Self-Control - Evidence from an Experimental Study , 2014, ICIS.

[38]  David Gann,et al.  Architectural Leverage: Putting Platforms in Context , 2014 .

[39]  Yair Levy,et al.  A Systems Approach to Conduct an Effective Literature Review in Support of Information Systems Research , 2006, Informing Sci. Int. J. an Emerg. Transdiscipl..

[40]  R. G. Fichman,et al.  Digital Innovation as a Fundamental and Powerful Concept in the Information Systems Curriculum , 2014, MIS Q..

[41]  N. Leech,et al.  An Array of Qualitative Data Analysis Tools: A Call for Data Analysis Triangulation. , 2007 .

[42]  J. Rochet,et al.  Two-sided markets: a progress report , 2006 .

[43]  Evangelos Katsamakas,et al.  Design and Ownership of Two-Sided Networks: Implications for Internet Platforms , 2008, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[44]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[45]  Chrisanthi Avgerou,et al.  Relational and institutional embeddedness of Web‐enabled entrepreneurial networks: case studies of netrepreneurs in China , 2013, Inf. Syst. J..

[46]  Christoph Rosenkranz,et al.  Inciting Networks Effects Through Platform Authority: A Design Theory for Service Platforms , 2013, ICIS.

[47]  Alfred Taudes,et al.  Software Growth Options , 1998, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[48]  K. Riemer,et al.  Social Software: Agents for Change or Platforms for Social Reproduction? A Case Study on Enterprise Microblogging , 2010 .

[49]  Christopher P. Holland,et al.  Strategy, networks and systems in the global translation services market , 2010, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[50]  Lihua Huang,et al.  The Role of IS Capabilities in the Development of Multi-Sided Platforms: The Digital Ecosystem Strategy of Alibaba.com , 2015, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[51]  Thomas R. Eisenmann,et al.  Platform Envelopment , 2010 .

[52]  L. Jeppesen,et al.  UNPAID CROWD COMPLEMENTORS : THE PLATFORM NETWORK EFFECT MIRAGE , 2014 .

[53]  Ron Weber,et al.  Evaluating and Developing Theories in the Information Systems Discipline , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[54]  Samuel B. Bacharach,et al.  Organizational Theories: Some Criteria for Evaluation , 1989 .

[55]  Jaeki Song,et al.  Towards a Theory of Information Technology Platform Adoption , 2013, ICIS.

[56]  Alison Harcourt.  The Palgrave Handbook of European Media Policy , 2015 .

[57]  Ralph Stair,et al.  Fundamentals of Information Systems , 2001 .

[58]  Vijayan Sugumaran,et al.  Flexible Software Component Design Using A Product Platform Approach , 2006, ICIS.

[59]  Annabelle Gawer,et al.  Platforms, Markets and Innovation: An Introduction , 2009 .

[60]  Peng Huang,et al.  Co-Creation of Value in a Platform Ecosystem: The Case of Enterprise Software , 2011, MIS Q..

[61]  Tobias Mettler,et al.  Revenue Streams of Cloud-based Platforms: Current State and Future Directions , 2011, AMCIS.

[62]  R. I. Sutton,et al.  The Stigma of Bankruptcy: Spoiled Organizational Image and Its Management , 1987 .

[63]  Arun Rai,et al.  Firm performance impacts of digitally enabled supply chain integration capabilities , 2006 .

[64]  Ola Henfridsson,et al.  Balancing platform control and external contribution in third‐party development: the boundary resources model , 2013, Inf. Syst. J..

[65]  Radhika Jain,et al.  The roles of contextual elements in post-merger common platform development: an empirical investigation , 2015, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[66]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  The impact of openness on the market potential of multi-sided platforms: a case study of mobile payment platforms , 2015, J. Inf. Technol..

[67]  M. Meyer,et al.  Product Platforms in Software Development , 1998 .

[68]  Thomas Hess,et al.  Motivational Drivers to Develop Apps for Social Software-Platforms: The Example of Facebook , 2010, AMCIS.

[69]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review , 2002, MIS Q..

[70]  Ragnhild Van Der Straeten,et al.  Platform ontologies for the model-driven architecture , 2007, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[71]  Andrea Resca,et al.  A design theory for digital platforms supporting online communities: a multiple case study , 2015, J. Inf. Technol..

[72]  Michael Rosemann,et al.  Platforms: A Systematic Review Of The Literature Using Algorithmic Historiography , 2015, ECIS.

[73]  Joseph A. Maxwell,et al.  Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach , 1996 .

[74]  Lakshmi Goel,et al.  From space to place: predicting users' intentions to return to virtual worlds , 2011 .

[75]  Ted Saarikko,et al.  Towards an Understanding of Entrepreneurial Alertness in the Formation of Platform Ecosystems , 2014, ECIS.

[76]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Review: Information Technology and Organizational Performance: An Integrative Model of IT Business Value , 2004, MIS Q..

[77]  Katarina Stanoevska-Slabeva,et al.  Platform as a Service - A Conjoint Study on Consumers' Preferences , 2012, ICIS.

[78]  Chimezie A. B. Osigweh.  Concept Fallibility in Organizational Science , 1989 .

[79]  Thomas Hess,et al.  Perceived Software Platform Openness: The Scale and its Impact on Developer Satisfaction , 2011, ICIS.

[80]  A. Gawer.  Platform Dynamics and Strategies: From Products to Services , 2009 .

[81]  Terence R. Mitchell,et al.  An Inductively Generated Typology and Process Model of Workplace Courage , 2015, Organ. Sci..

[82]  Birgitta Bergvall-Kåreborn,et al.  Persistent problems and practices in information systems development: a study of mobile applications development and distribution , 2014, Inf. Syst. J..

[83]  Ashley A. Bush,et al.  Platform Evolution: Coevolution of Platform Architecture, Governance, and Environmental Dynamics , 2010 .

[84]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Organizing for Innovation in the Digitized World , 2012, Organ. Sci..

[85]  R. Suddaby.  Editor's Comments: Construct Clarity in Theories of Management and Organization , 2010 .