Long-term trajectories of community integration: identification, characterization, and prediction using inpatient rehabilitation variables

ABSTRACT Background Community integration (CI) is often regarded as the foundation of rehabilitation endeavors after stroke; nevertheless, few studies have investigated the relationship between inpatient rehabilitation (clinical and demographic) variables and long-term CI. Objectives To identify novel classes of patients having similar temporal patterns in CI and relate them to baseline features. Methods Retrospective observational cohort study analyzing (n = 287) adult patients with stroke admitted to rehabilitation between 2003 and 2018, including baseline Functional Independence Measure (FIM) at discharge, follow-ups (m = 1264) of Community Integration Questionnaire (CIQ) between 2006 and 2022. Growth mixture models (GMMs) were fitted to identify CI trajectories, and baseline predictors were identified using multivariate logistic regression (reporting AUC) with 10-fold cross validation. Results Each patient was assessed at 2.7 (2.2–3.7), 4.4 (3.7–5.6), and 6.2 (5.4–7.4) years after injury, 66% had a fourth assessment at 7.9 (6.8–8.9) years. GMM identified three classes of trajectories: Lowest CI (n=105, 36.6%): The lowest mean total CIQ; highest proportion of dysphagia (47.6%) and aphasia (46.7%), oldest at injury, largest length of stay (LOS), largest time to admission, and lowest FIM. Highest CI (n=63, 21.9%): The highest mean total CIQ, youngest, shortest LOS, highest education (27% university) highest FIM, and Intermediate CI (n=119, 41.5%): Intermediate mean total CIQ and FIM scores. Age at injury OR: 0.89 (0.85–0.93), FIM OR: 1.04 (1.02–1.07), hypertension OR: 2.86 (1.25–6.87), LOS OR: 0.98 (0.97–0.99), and high education OR: 3.05 (1.22–7.65) predicted highest CI, and AUC was 0.84 (0.76–0.93). Conclusion Novel clinical (e.g. hypertension) and demographic (e.g. education) variables characterized and predicted long-term CI trajectories.

[1]  Alex A. Freitas,et al.  A data-driven missing value imputation approach for longitudinal datasets , 2021, Artificial Intelligence Review.

[2]  Luppana Kitrungrote,et al.  Community Integration After Traumatic Brain Injury and Related Factors: A Study in the Nepalese Context , 2020, SAGE open nursing.

[3]  B. D. De Stavola,et al.  Identification and prediction of novel classes of long-term disease trajectories for patients with juvenile dermatomyositis using growth mixture models , 2020, Rheumatology.

[4]  M. Choinière,et al.  Trajectory Modelling Techniques Useful to Epidemiological Research: A Comparative Narrative Review of Approaches , 2020, Clinical epidemiology.

[5]  A. Lawan,et al.  Quality of life of stroke survivors in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2020, Quality of Life Research.

[6]  Yuming Guo,et al.  STROBE, Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology. , 2020 .

[7]  J. Oliveira-Filho,et al.  Investigating predictors of community integration in individuals after stroke in a residential setting: A longitutinal study , 2020, PloS one.

[8]  P. Battista,et al.  Sex Differences in Long-Term Mortality and Functional Outcome After Rehabilitation in Patients With Severe Stroke , 2020, Frontiers in Neurology.

[9]  M. Kadar,et al.  Translation, Validation and Reliability Testing of Community Integration Questionnaire-Revised (CIQ-R) Malay Version: A Preliminary Study , 2020, Occupational therapy in health care.

[10]  A. Cieza Rehabilitation the Health Strategy of the 21st Century, Really? , 2019, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[11]  C. V. van Heugten,et al.  Course of Social Participation in the First 2 Years After Stroke and Its Associations With Demographic and Stroke-Related Factors , 2018, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[12]  N. Andelic,et al.  Trajectory of Functional Independent Measurements during First Five Years after Moderate and Severe Traumatic Brain Injury. , 2018, Journal of neurotrauma.

[13]  J. Lundälv,et al.  The impact of physical function on participation in the first year post‐stroke , 2017, Acta neurologica Scandinavica.

[14]  L. Veronelli,et al.  Motor recovery in post-stroke patients with aphasia: the role of specific linguistic abilities , 2017, Topics in stroke rehabilitation.

[15]  Michael T. Mullen,et al.  Quality of life after stroke in Pakistan , 2016, BMC Neurology.

[16]  S. D. Winter,et al.  Additional Information: The GRoLTS-checklist: Guidelines for Reporting on Latent Trajectory Studies , 2016 .

[17]  R. Kashyap,et al.  Prediction of Outcome in Diabetic Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients: A Hospital-Based Pilot Study Report , 2016, Annals of Neurosciences.

[18]  E. Steultjens,et al.  What environmental factors influence resumption of valued activities post stroke: a systematic review of qualitative and quantitative findings , 2016, Clinical rehabilitation.

[19]  B. Willer,et al.  The Community Integration Questionnaire - Revised: Australian normative data and measurement of electronic social networking. , 2016, Australian occupational therapy journal.

[20]  P. Guida,et al.  Functional Gain After Inpatient Stroke Rehabilitation: Correlates and Impact on Long-Term Survival , 2015, Stroke.

[21]  Benoit Liquet,et al.  Estimation of extended mixed models using latent classes and latent processes: the R package lcmm , 2015, 1503.00890.

[22]  Peter Carl,et al.  Econometric tools for performance and risk analysis , 2014 .

[23]  E. Cocks,et al.  Framework for describing community integration for people with acquired brain injury. , 2012, Australian occupational therapy journal.

[24]  B. Adegoke,et al.  Community reintegration and related factors in a Nigerian stroke sample. , 2012, African health sciences.

[25]  Derick T Wade,et al.  Goal setting in rehabilitation: an overview of what, why and how , 2009, Clinical rehabilitation.

[26]  J. Desrosiers,et al.  Predictors of reintegration to normal living in older adults discharged from an intensive rehabilitation program , 2008, International journal of rehabilitation research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation.

[27]  K. Brock,et al.  The effect of the introduction of a case-mix-based funding model of rehabilitation for severe stroke: an Australian experience. , 2007, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[28]  R. O’Brien,et al.  A Caution Regarding Rules of Thumb for Variance Inflation Factors , 2007 .

[29]  R. Teasell,et al.  Community Reintegration After Stroke , 2003, Topics in stroke rehabilitation.

[30]  D. Rintala,et al.  Psychometric properties of a Spanish-language version of the Community Integration Questionnaire (CIQ) , 2002 .

[31]  J. Kreutzer,et al.  Assessment of community integration following rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury , 1993 .

[32]  C. Granger,et al.  PERFORMANCE PROFILES OF THE FUNCTIONAL INDEPENDENCE MEASURE , 1993, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[33]  C. Vallée,et al.  [Occupational therapy and community integration of adults with neurological conditions: A scoping review]. , 2018, Canadian journal of occupational therapy. Revue canadienne d'ergotherapie.

[34]  J. Arango-Lasprilla,et al.  Modeling of Community Integration Trajectories in the First Five Years after Traumatic Brain Injury. , 2016, Journal of neurotrauma.

[35]  A. Murtezani,et al.  Factors associated with reintegration to normal living after stroke. , 2009, Medicinski arhiv.

[36]  R Whurr,et al.  Speech and language therapy for aphasia following stroke. , 2000, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[37]  S. Wood-Dauphinée,et al.  Reintegration to Normal Living as a proxy to quality of life. , 1987, Journal of chronic diseases.