How UGVs physically fail in the field

This paper presents a detailed look at how unmanned ground vehicles (UGVs) fail in the field using information from 10 studies and 15 different models in Urban Search and Rescue or military field applications. One explores failures encountered in a limited amount of time in a real crisis (World Trade Center rescue response). Another covers regular use of 13 robots over two years. The remaining eight studies are field tests of robots performed by the Test and Evaluation Coordination Office at Fort Leonard Wood. A novel taxonomy of UGV failures is presented which categorizes failures based on the cause (physical or human), its impact, and its repairability. Important statistics are derived and illustrative examples of physical failures are examined using this taxonomy. Reliability in field environments is low, between 6 and 20 hours mean time between failures. For example, during the PANTHER study (F. Cook, 1997) 35 failures occurred in 32 days. The primary cause varies: one study showed 50% of failures caused by effectors; another study showed 54% of failures occurred in the control system. Common causes are: unstable control systems, platforms designed for a narrow range of conditions, limited wireless communication range, and insufficient bandwidth for video-based feedback.

[1]  Colin Potts,et al.  Design of Everyday Things , 1988 .

[2]  Frederick T. Sheldon,et al.  Reliability prediction of distributed embedded fault-tolerant systems , 1993, Proceedings of 1993 IEEE International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering.

[3]  J-C. Laprie,et al.  DEPENDABLE COMPUTING AND FAULT TOLERANCE : CONCEPTS AND TERMINOLOGY , 1995, Twenty-Fifth International Symposium on Fault-Tolerant Computing, 1995, ' Highlights from Twenty-Five Years'..

[4]  Yves Beauchamp,et al.  A review of experimental studies on human-robot system situations and their design implications , 1995 .

[5]  Kimon P. Valavanis,et al.  Error specification, monitoring and recovery in computer-integrated manufacturing: an analytic approach , 1996 .

[6]  Srini Ramaswamy,et al.  Hierarchical time-extended Petri nets (H-EPNs) based error identification and recovery for multilevel systems , 1996, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B.

[7]  Michael Toscano.  Department of Defense Joint Robotics Program , 1999, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[8]  Andrew Starr,et al.  Failure analysis of mature robots in automated production , 1999 .

[9]  Robin R. Murphy,et al.  Issues in intelligent robots for search and rescue , 2000, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[10]  Reid G. Simmons,et al.  Towards automatic verification of autonomous systems , 2000, Proceedings. 2000 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2000) (Cat. No.00CH37113).

[11]  Robin R. Murphy,et al.  Mobility and sensing demands in USAR , 2000, 2000 26th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society. IECON 2000. 2000 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Electronics, Control and Instrumentation. 21st Century Technologies.

[12]  Robin R. Murphy,et al.  Introduction to AI Robotics , 2000 .

[13]  Ayeley P. Tchangani.  Reliability analysis using Bayesian networks , 2001 .

[14]  Hobart R. Everett,et al.  Autonomous mobile communication relays , 2002, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[15]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  ASCENT: Adaptive Self-Configuring sEnsor Networks Topologies , 2002, Proceedings.Twenty-First Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies.

[16]  Juan Carlos Fraile Marinero,et al.  Influences of robot maintenance and failures in the performance of a multirobot system , 2002, IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[17]  Mark Micire.  ANALYSIS OF THE ROBOTIC-ASSISTED SEARCH AND RESCUE RESPONSE TO THE WORLD TRADE CENTER DISASTER , 2002 .

[18]  Austin Henderson,et al.  Interaction design: beyond human-computer interaction , 2002, UBIQ.

[19]  Roland Siegwart,et al.  Design and System Integration for the Expo.02 Robot , 2002 .

[20]  Robin R. Murphy,et al.  Reliability analysis of mobile robots , 2003, 2003 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.03CH37422).

[21]  Illah R. Nourbakhsh,et al.  The mobot museum robot installations: a five year experiment , 2003, Proceedings 2003 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2003) (Cat. No.03CH37453).

[22]  Sri Hastuti Kurniawan,et al.  Review of Interaction design , 2003 .

[23]  Roy Sterritt,et al.  Autonomic Computing - a means of achieving dependability? , 2003, 10th IEEE International Conference and Workshop on the Engineering of Computer-Based Systems, 2003. Proceedings..

[24]  John G. Blitch.  Adaptive mobility for rescue robots , 2003, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[25]  Robin R. Murphy,et al.  Moonlight in Miami : A Field Study of Human-Robot Interaction in the Context of an Urban Search and Rescue Disaster Response Training Exercise , 2003 .

[26]  Robin R. Murphy,et al.  Follow-up analysis of mobile robot failures , 2004, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2004. Proceedings. ICRA '04. 2004.