A deep learning method for prediction of three-dimensional dose distribution of helical tomotherapy.

PURPOSE To develop a deep learning method for prediction of three-dimensional (3D) voxel-by-voxel dose distributions of helical tomotherapy (HT). METHODS Using previously treated HT plans as training data, a deep learning model named U-ResNet-D was trained to predict a 3D dose distribution. First, the contoured structures and dose volumes were converted from plan database to 3D matrix with a program based on a developed visualization toolkit (VTK), then transferred to U-ResNet-D for correlating anatomical features and dose distributions at voxel-level. One hundred and ninety nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) patients treated by HT with multiple planning target volumes (PTVs) in different prescription patterns were studied. The model was typically trained from scratch with weights randomly initialized rather than using transfer-learning method, and used to predict new patient's 3D dose distributions. The predictive accuracy was evaluated with three methods: (a) The dose difference at the position r, δ(r, r) = Dc (r) - Dp (r), was calculated for each voxel. The mean (μδ(r,r) ) and standard deviation (σδ(r,r) ) of δ(r, r) were calculated to assess the prediction bias and precision; (b) The mean absolute differences of dosimetric indexes (DIs) including maximum and mean dose, homogeneity index, conformity index, and dose spillage for PTVs and organ at risks (OARs) were calculated and statistically analyzed with the paired-samples t test; (c) Dice similarity coefficients (DSC) between predicted and clinical isodose volumes were calculated. RESULTS The U-ResNet-D model predicted 3D dose distribution accurately. For twenty tested patients, the prediction bias ranged from -2.0% to 2.3% and prediction error varied from 1.5% to 4.5% (relative to prescription) for 3D dose differences. The mean absolute dose differences for PTVs and OARs are within 2.0% and 4.2%, and nearly all the DIs for PTVs and OARs had no significant differences. The averaged DSC ranged from 0.95 to 1 for different isodose volumes. CONCLUSIONS The study developed a new deep learning method for 3D voxel-by-voxel dose prediction, and shown to be able to produce accurately dose predictions for nasopharyngeal patients treated by HT. The predicted 3D dose map can be useful for improving radiotherapy planning design, ensuring plan quality and consistency, making clinical technique comparison, and guiding automatic treatment planning.

[1]  A. Brahme,et al.  Optimization of stationary and moving beam radiation therapy techniques. , 1988, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[2]  Andrew Zisserman,et al.  Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition , 2014, ICLR.

[3]  Binbin Wu,et al.  Improved robotic stereotactic body radiation therapy plan quality and planning efficacy for organ-confined prostate cancer utilizing overlap-volume histogram-driven planning methodology. , 2014, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[4]  Xi Zhou,et al.  Data augmentation for face recognition , 2017, Neurocomputing.

[5]  M Hussein,et al.  Challenges in calculation of the gamma index in radiotherapy - Towards good practice. , 2017, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.

[6]  Russell H. Taylor,et al.  Patient geometry-driven information retrieval for IMRT treatment plan quality control. , 2009, Medical physics.

[7]  Jiawei Fan,et al.  Automatic treatment planning based on three‐dimensional dose distribution predicted from deep learning technique , 2018, Medical physics.

[8]  M. Kaus,et al.  Development and evaluation of an efficient approach to volumetric arc therapy planning. , 2009, Medical physics.

[9]  Thomas Brox,et al.  U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation , 2015, MICCAI.

[10]  Yaorong Ge,et al.  Modeling the dosimetry of organ-at-risk in head and neck IMRT planning: an intertechnique and interinstitutional study. , 2013, Medical physics.

[11]  Kaiming He,et al.  Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[12]  Jian Sun,et al.  Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition , 2015, 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[13]  N Hodapp,et al.  [The ICRU Report 83: prescribing, recording and reporting photon-beam intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT)]. , 2012, Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al].

[14]  Trevor Darrell,et al.  Fully Convolutional Networks for Semantic Segmentation , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[15]  Rob Fergus,et al.  Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networks , 2013, ECCV.

[16]  Jun Tan,et al.  Knowledge-based prediction of plan quality metrics in intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery. , 2015, Medical physics.

[17]  Sergey Ioffe,et al.  Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shift , 2015, ICML.

[18]  Kuo Men,et al.  A feasibility study on an automated method to generate patient‐specific dose distributions for radiotherapy using deep learning , 2018, Medical physics.

[19]  Russell H. Taylor,et al.  Using overlap volume histogram and IMRT plan data to guide and automate VMAT planning: a head-and-neck case study. , 2013, Medical physics.

[20]  J O Deasy,et al.  Tomotherapy: a new concept for the delivery of dynamic conformal radiotherapy. , 1993, Medical physics.

[21]  Y. Ge,et al.  Quantitative analysis of the factors which affect the interpatient organ-at-risk dose sparing variation in IMRT plans. , 2012, Medical physics.

[22]  Russell H. Taylor,et al.  Data-driven approach to generating achievable dose-volume histogram objectives in intensity-modulated radiotherapy planning. , 2011, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[23]  David A. Jaffray,et al.  Fully automated treatment planning for head and neck radiotherapy using a voxel-based dose prediction and dose mimicking method , 2016, Physics in medicine and biology.

[24]  D. Low,et al.  Experience-based quality control of clinical intensity-modulated radiotherapy planning. , 2011, International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics.

[25]  D. Low,et al.  A technique for the quantitative evaluation of dose distributions. , 1998, Medical physics.

[26]  Sasa Mutic,et al.  Quantifying Unnecessary Normal Tissue Complication Risks due to Suboptimal Planning: A Secondary Study of RTOG 0126. , 2015, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[27]  S. Webb Optimisation of conformal radiotherapy dose distributions by simulated annealing. , 1989, Physics in medicine and biology.

[28]  Karl Otto,et al.  Volumetric modulated arc therapy: IMRT in a single gantry arc. , 2007, Medical physics.

[29]  T. Bortfeld,et al.  Methods of image reconstruction from projections applied to conformation radiotherapy. , 1990, Physics in medicine and biology.

[30]  Binbin Wu,et al.  An overlap-volume-histogram based method for rectal dose prediction and automated treatment planning in the external beam prostate radiotherapy following hydrogel injection. , 2012, Medical physics.

[31]  Vibhav Vineet,et al.  Conditional Random Fields as Recurrent Neural Networks , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV).

[32]  Thomas G. Purdie,et al.  Contextual Atlas Regression Forests: Multiple-Atlas-Based Automated Dose Prediction in Radiation Therapy , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[33]  Satomi Shiraishi,et al.  Knowledge-based prediction of three-dimensional dose distributions for external beam radiotherapy. , 2015, Medical physics.

[34]  Mark D. McDonnell,et al.  Understanding Data Augmentation for Classification: When to Warp? , 2016, 2016 International Conference on Digital Image Computing: Techniques and Applications (DICTA).

[35]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Deep Learning , 2015, Nature.

[36]  Sasa Mutic,et al.  Predicting dose-volume histograms for organs-at-risk in IMRT planning. , 2012, Medical physics.

[37]  D A Low,et al.  A software tool for the quantitative evaluation of 3D dose calculation algorithms. , 1998, Medical physics.

[38]  Geoff Delaney,et al.  The role of radiotherapy in cancer treatment , 2005, Cancer.

[39]  Minsong Cao,et al.  Predicting liver SBRT eligibility and plan quality for VMAT and 4π plans , 2017, Radiation oncology.

[40]  Trevor Darrell,et al.  Rich Feature Hierarchies for Accurate Object Detection and Semantic Segmentation , 2013, 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[41]  Fang-Fang Yin,et al.  A planning quality evaluation tool for prostate adaptive IMRT based on machine learning. , 2011, Medical physics.

[42]  Cedric X. Yu,et al.  Intensity-modulated arc therapy with dynamic multileaf collimation: an alternative to tomotherapy. , 1995, Physics in medicine and biology.

[43]  Iasonas Kokkinos,et al.  DeepLab: Semantic Image Segmentation with Deep Convolutional Nets, Atrous Convolution, and Fully Connected CRFs , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[44]  Yoshua Bengio,et al.  Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition , 1998, Proc. IEEE.

[45]  Moyed Miften,et al.  Neural network dose models for knowledge‐based planning in pancreatic SBRT , 2017, Medical physics.

[46]  I. Paddick A simple scoring ratio to index the conformity of radiosurgical treatment plans. Technical note. , 2000, Journal of neurosurgery.

[47]  Geoff Delaney M.B.B.S.,et al.  The role of radiotherapy in cancer treatment , 2005 .

[48]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks , 2012, Commun. ACM.