An EMO Algorithm Using the Hypervolume Measure as Selection Criterion

The hypervolume measure is one of the most frequently applied measures for comparing the results of evolutionary multiobjective optimization algorithms (EMOA). The idea to use this measure for selection is self-evident. A steady-state EMOA will be devised, that combines concepts of non-dominated sorting with a selection operator based on the hypervolume measure. The algorithm computes a well distributed set of solutions with bounded size thereby focussing on interesting regions of the Pareto front(s). By means of standard benchmark problems the algorithm will be compared to other well established EMOA. The results show that our new algorithm achieves good convergence to the Pareto front and outperforms standard methods in the hypervolume covered. We also studied the applicability of the new approach in the important field of design optimization. In order to reduce the number of time consuming precise function evaluations, the algorithm will be supported by approximate function evaluations based on Kriging metamodels. First results on an airfoil redesign problem indicate a good performance of this approach, especially if the computation of a small, bounded number of well-distributed solutions is desired.

[1]  Gary B. Lamont,et al.  Evolutionary Algorithms for Solving Multi-Objective Problems (Genetic and Evolutionary Computation) , 2006 .

[2]  Lothar Thiele,et al.  Comparison of Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithms: Empirical Results , 2000, Evolutionary Computation.

[3]  Thomas Bäck,et al.  Evaluating Multi-criteria Evolutionary Algorithms for Airfoil Optimisation , 2002, PPSN.

[4]  Lothar Thiele,et al.  Multiobjective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms - A Comparative Case Study , 1998, PPSN.

[5]  Joshua D. Knowles,et al.  Bounded archiving using the lebesgue measure , 2003, The 2003 Congress on Evolutionary Computation, 2003. CEC '03..

[6]  Thomas J. Santner,et al.  Design and analysis of computer experiments , 1998 .

[7]  I. C. Parmee Adaptive Computing in Design and Manufacture , 1998 .

[8]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II , 2002, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[9]  Gary B. Lamont,et al.  Evolutionary Algorithms for Solving Multi-Objective Problems , 2002, Genetic Algorithms and Evolutionary Computation.

[10]  Michael Emmerich,et al.  Metamodel Assisted Multiobjective Optimisation Strategies and their Application in Airfoil Design , 2004 .

[11]  M. Fleischer,et al.  The Measure of Pareto Optima , 2003, EMO.

[12]  David W. Corne,et al.  Properties of an adaptive archiving algorithm for storing nondominated vectors , 2003, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[13]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  Towards a Quick Computation of Well-Spread Pareto-Optimal Solutions , 2003, EMO.

[14]  Mark Fleischer,et al.  The measure of pareto optima: Applications to multi-objective metaheuristics , 2003 .

[15]  Eckart Zitzler,et al.  Evolutionary algorithms for multiobjective optimization: methods and applications , 1999 .

[16]  Joshua D. Knowles,et al.  On metrics for comparing nondominated sets , 2002, Proceedings of the 2002 Congress on Evolutionary Computation. CEC'02 (Cat. No.02TH8600).