The Effects of Enrichment of Three‐Species Food Chains with Nonlinear Functional Responses

This article investigates the dynamic behavior of a model of an unstable food chain consisting of three species or trophic levels. The model assumes that each of the consumer species has a Holling type 2 functional response. The study examines how dynamic behaviors and top-level population densities change with the carrying capacity of the bottom level. In all cases examined, the mean population density of the top species initially increases, but eventually decreases as carrying capacity is increased. In some cases, a sufficient increase in the carrying capacity of the bottom species leads to extinction of the top species. If the maximum rate of change of the top species is sufficiently slow relative to the middle species, the period of the population cycles in the top species can change rapidly with a small change in the carrying capacity of the bottom species. Low carrying capacities produce simple cycles with a long period, while high carrying capacities produce simple cycles with a short period. For intermediate carrying capacities, more complex dynamical behaviors, including chaos, may occur. Systems that have only one equilibrium point with all species present may have two alternative attractors with very different densities of the top-level species. The responses of the bottom two species to an increased carrying capacity are also discussed. The results imply that nutrient enrichment may ad- versely affect high-level consumers and that reductions in the density of top-level consumers may make it difficult or impossible to restore their populations.

[1]  A. Hastings,et al.  Chaos in a Three-Species Food Chain , 1991 .

[2]  Contributions to the global analysis of 3-D Lotka-Volterra equations: Dynamic boundedness and indirect interactions in the case of one predator and two prey , 1991 .

[3]  C. S. Holling.  The components of prédation as revealed by a study of small-mammal prédation of the European pine sawfly. , 1959 .

[4]  W. Schaffer.  ECOLOGICAL ABSTRACTION: THE CONSEQUENCES OF REDUCED DIMENSIONALITY IN ECOLOGICAL MODELS' , 1981 .

[5]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical recipes , 1990 .

[6]  M. Power,et al.  Productivity, consumers, and the structure of a river food chain. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  D. Wollkind.  Exploitation in Three Trophic Levels: An Extension Allowing Intraspecies Carnivore Interaction , 1976, The American Naturalist.

[8]  M. A. Leibold,et al.  Resource Edibility and the Effects of Predators and Productivity on the Outcome of Trophic Interactions , 1989, The American Naturalist.

[9]  P. Yodzis,et al.  Introduction to Theoretical Ecology , 1989 .

[10]  R. Macarthur.  Species packing and competitive equilibrium for many species. , 1970, Theoretical population biology.

[11]  Joel E. Cohen,et al.  Community Food Webs: Data and Theory , 1990 .

[12]  Peter A. Abrams,et al.  Foraging Time Optimization and Interactions in Food Webs , 1984, The American Naturalist.

[13]  M. Gilpin.  Group selection in predator-prey communities. , 1975, Monographs in population biology.

[14]  Robert M. May,et al.  Limit Cycles in Predator-Prey Communities , 1972, Science.

[15]  M. Rosenzweig,et al.  Exploitation in Three Trophic Levels , 1973, The American Naturalist.

[16]  P. Yodzis,et al.  Body Size and Consumer-Resource Dynamics , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[17]  Michael E. Gilpin,et al.  Spiral Chaos in a Predator-Prey Model , 1979, The American Naturalist.

[18]  L. Oksanen,et al.  Exploitation Ecosystems in Gradients of Primary Productivity , 1981, The American Naturalist.

[19]  M. Power,et al.  TOP-DOWN AND BOTTOM-UP FORCES IN FOOD WEBS: DO PLANTS HAVE PRIMACY? , 1992 .

[20]  James P. Grover,et al.  Dynamics of Nutrient Cycling and Food Webs , 1992 .

[21]  Peter A. Abrams,et al.  Predators that Benefit Prey and Prey that Harm Predators: Unusual Effects of Interacting Foraging Adaptation , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[22]  M. Hassell.  The dynamics of arthropod predator-prey systems. , 1979, Monographs in population biology.

[23]  J. Moen,et al.  The Time-Scale Problem in Exploiter-Victim Models: Does the Solution Lie in Ratio-Dependent Exploitation? , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[24]  P. Matson,et al.  The relative contributions of top-down and bottom-up forces in population and community ecology , 1992 .

[25]  Population dynamics of systems with consumers that maintain a constant ratio of intake rates of two resources , 1989 .

[26]  Lennart Persson,et al.  Trophic Interactions in Temperate Lake Ecosystems: A Test of Food Chain Theory , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[27]  M. Levandowsky,et al.  Modeling Nature: Episodes in the History of Population Ecology , 1985 .

[28]  P. Matson,et al.  Special Feature: Ratio‐Dependent Predator‐Prey Theory , 1992 .

[29]  S. Diehl,et al.  Daphnia-Phytoplankton Interactions in Lakes: Is There a Need for Ratio-Dependent Consumer-Resource Models? , 1993, The American Naturalist.

[30]  M. Rosenzweig.  Paradox of Enrichment: Destabilization of Exploitation Ecosystems in Ecological Time , 1971, Science.

[31]  G. Mittelbach,et al.  Trophic Relations and Ontogenetic Niche Shifts in Aquatic Ecosystems , 1988 .

[32]  Peter A. Abrams,et al.  Effect of Increased Productivity on the Abundances of Trophic Levels , 1993, The American Naturalist.

[33]  S. Fretwell,et al.  The Regulation of Plant Communities by the Food Chains Exploiting Them , 2015 .

[34]  M. Scheffer,et al.  Seasonality and Chaos in a Plankton Fish Model , 1993 .