Relative Precision of Inhaler Aerodynamic Particle Size Distribution (APSD) Metrics by Full Resolution and Abbreviated Andersen Cascade Impactors (ACIs): Part 2—Investigation of Bias in Extra-Fine Mass Fraction with AIM-HRT Impactor

The purpose of this study was to resolve an anomalously high measure of extra-fine particle fraction (EPF) determined by the abbreviated cascade impactor possibly relevant for human respiratory tract (AIM-HRT) in the experiment described in Part 1 of this two-part series, in which the relative precision of abbreviated impactors was evaluated in comparison with a full resolution Andersen eight-stage cascade impactor (ACI). Evidence that the surface coating used to mitigate particle bounce was laterally displaced by the flow emerging from the jets of the lower stage was apparent upon microscopic examination of the associated collection plate of the AIM-HRT impactor whose cut point size defines EPF. A filter soaked in surfactant was floated on top of this collection plate, and further measurements were made using the same pressurized metered-dose inhaler-based formulation and following the same procedure as in Part 1. Measures of EPF, fine particle, and coarse particle fractions were comparable with those obtained with the ACI, indicating that the cause of the bias had been identified and removed. When working with abbreviated impactors, this precaution is advised whenever there is evidence that surface coating displacement has occurred, a task that can be readily accomplished by microscopic inspection of all collection plates after allowing the impactor to sample ambient air for a few minutes.

[1]  Jolyon P Mitchell,et al.  Cascade impactors for the size characterization of aerosols from medical inhalers: their uses and limitations. , 2003, Journal of aerosol medicine : the official journal of the International Society for Aerosols in Medicine.

[2]  K. T. Whitby,et al.  Non-ideal collection characteristics of inertial impactors—II. Cascade impactors , 1978 .

[3]  M. Dolovich Measurement of particle size characteristics of metered dose inhaler (MDI) aerosols. , 1991, Journal of aerosol medicine : the official journal of the International Society for Aerosols in Medicine.

[4]  C. Goodman United States Pharmacopeial Convention , 1988 .

[5]  Svetlana Lyapustina,et al.  Considerations for the development and practice of cascade impaction testing, including a mass balance failure investigation tree. , 2003, Journal of aerosol medicine : the official journal of the International Society for Aerosols in Medicine.

[6]  M. Nagel,et al.  The Abbreviated Impactor Measurement (AIM) Concept: Part 1—Influence of Particle Bounce and Re-Entrainment—Evaluation with a “Dry” Pressurized Metered Dose Inhaler (pMDI)-Based Formulation , 2009, AAPS PharmSciTech.

[7]  B A Olson,et al.  The role of inertial particle collectors in evaluating pharmaceutical aerosol delivery systems. , 1998, Journal of aerosol medicine : the official journal of the International Society for Aerosols in Medicine.

[8]  Kenneth L. Rubow,et al.  Influence of cross-flow on particle collection characteristics of multi-nozzle impactors , 1991 .

[9]  A. Hickey,et al.  Evaluation of preseparator performance for the 8-stage nonviable Andersen impactor , 2001, AAPS PharmSciTech.

[10]  Influence of substrate porosity and thickness on the collection efficiency of an impactor stage , 2010 .

[11]  Benjamin Y. H. Liu,et al.  Characteristics of laminar jet impactors , 1974 .

[12]  K. T. Whitby,et al.  Non-ideal collection characteristics of inertial impactors—I. Single-stage impactors and solid particles , 1978 .

[13]  Abdo Kataya,et al.  Reducing bounce effects in the Andersen cascade impactor. , 2005, International journal of pharmaceutics.

[14]  Svetlana Lyapustina,et al.  Relative Precision of Inhaler Aerodynamic Particle Size Distribution (APSD) Metrics by Full Resolution and Abbreviated Andersen Cascade Impactors (ACIs): Part 1 , 2010, AAPS PharmSciTech.