Utilizing R Software Package for Dose-Response Studies: The Concept and Data Analysis

Advances in statistical software allow statistical methods for nonlinear regression analysis of dose-response curves to be carried out conveniently by non-statisticians. One such statistical software is the program R with the drc extension package. The drc package can: (1) simultaneously fit multiple dose-response curves; (2) compare curve parameters for significant differences; (3) calculate any point along the curve at the response level of interest, commonly known as an effective dose (e.g., ED30, ED50, ED90), and determine its significance; and (4) generate graphs for publications or presentations. We believe that the drc package has advantages that include: the ability to relatively simply and quickly compare multiple curves and select ED-levels easily along the curve with relevant statistics; the package is free of charge and does not require licensing fees, and the size of the package is only 70 MB. Therefore, our objectives are to: (1) provide a review of a few common issues in dose-response-curve fitting, and (2) facilitate the use of up-to-date statistical techniques for analysis of dose-response curves with this software. The methods described can be utilized to evaluate chemical and non-chemical weed control options. Benefits to the practitioners and academics are also presented.

[1]  Douglas G. Smith,et al.  Purple Loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria) Control with Herbicides: Single-Year Application1 , 2004 .

[2]  Edward J Calabrese,et al.  Toxicology rethinks its central belief , 2003, Nature.

[3]  S. Knezevic,et al.  Yield Penalty Due to Delayed Weed Control in Corn and Soybean , 2003 .

[4]  Christian Ritz,et al.  Improved empirical models describing hormesis , 2005, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[5]  P. Westra,et al.  A New Approach To Determine When to Control Weeds , 1996, Weed Science.

[6]  J. E. Jensen,et al.  Log-Logistic Analysis of Herbicide Dose-Response Relationships , 1995, Weed Technology.

[7]  J. Ascard,et al.  Effects of flame weeding on weed species at different developmental stages. , 1995 .

[8]  R. Stamps.  Prodiamine Controlled Florida Betony (Stachys floridana) in Leatherleaf Fern (Rumohra adiantiformis) , 1992, Weed Technology.

[9]  C. Swanton,et al.  Weed Control in Glufosinate-Resistant Corn (Zea mays)1 , 2000, Weed Technology.

[10]  Jens C. Streibig,et al.  Bioassay analysis using R , 2005 .

[11]  M. G. Merkle,et al.  Interactions Between Primisulfuron and Selected Soil-Applied Insecticides in Corn (Zea mays) , 1992, Weed Technology.

[12]  A. Dieleman,et al.  Decision Rules for Postemergence Control of Pigweed (Amaranthus spp.) in Soybean (Glycine max) , 1996, Weed science.

[13]  S. Knezevic,et al.  Row Spacing Influences the Critical Timing for Weed Removal in Soybean (Glycine max)1 , 2003, Weed Technology.

[14]  E. Calabrese,et al.  U-shaped dose-responses in biology, toxicology, and public health. , 2001, Annual review of public health.

[15]  Roger D. Cousens,et al.  An equation to describe dose responses where there is stimulation of growth at low doses , 1989 .

[16]  D. Poston,et al.  Cost-Efficient Weed Control in Soybean (Glycine max) with Cultivation and Banded Herbicide Applications , 1992, Weed Technology.

[17]  Oliver Schabenberger,et al.  Statistical Tests for Hormesis and Effective Dosages in Herbicide Dose Response , 1999 .

[18]  J. Ascard,et al.  Dose–response models for flame weeding in relation to plant size and density , 1994 .

[19]  C. Swanton,et al.  Biologically Effective Dose and Selectivity of RPA 201772 for Preemergence Weed Control in Corn (Zea mays) , 1998, Weed Technology.

[20]  C. Beste.  Herbicide handbook of the Weed Science Society of America , 1983 .

[21]  J. Lindquist,et al.  Performance of WeedSOFT for Predicting Soybean Yield Loss1 , 2006, Weed Technology.

[22]  J. Lindquist,et al.  Influence of nitrogen and duration of weed interference on corn growth and development , 2003, Weed Science.

[23]  E. Calabrese.  Overcompensation Stimulation: A Mechanism for Hormetic Effects , 2001, Critical reviews in toxicology.

[24]  R. Cousens.  Aspects of the Design and Interpretation of Competition (Interference) Experiments , 1991, Weed Technology.

[25]  C. Swanton,et al.  Biologically Effective Dose and Selectivity of SAN 1269H (BAS 662H) for Weed Control in Corn (Zea mays) , 1999, Weed Technology.

[26]  Roger D. Cousens,et al.  Misinterpretations of results in weed research through inappropriate use of statistics , 1988 .

[27]  Erin E. Blankenship,et al.  Critical period for weed control: the concept and data analysis , 2002, Weed Science.